On 2013-01-07 00:11, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 12:02 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Splitting /proc is not a good idea from the usability POV. The whole
>> point of showing the load of IRQs in /stat is to have all information in
>> one place (percentages sum up to 100...).
>>
>> I've
On 01/07/2013 12:02 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Splitting /proc is not a good idea from the usability POV. The whole
> point of showing the load of IRQs in /stat is to have all information in
> one place (percentages sum up to 100...).
>
> I've pushed a simple patch via for-upstream in my repo that s
On 2013-01-06 17:08, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 01:54 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>
>> On 01/04/2013 12:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-04 12:33, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 01/04/2013 12:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-04 11:32, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 0
On 01/04/2013 01:54 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 12:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-01-04 12:33, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2013 12:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-01-04 11:32, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 11:16 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-01-04
ich will pop up as soon as people start using the
> modified version and cause us to keep working on 2.6 whereas we should
> be working on -forge.
I cannot chose yet where I'd like to work on. Getting a working combo of
Xenomai 2.6 with kernel 3.x will hopefully give us the room to move on.
On 01/06/2013 04:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 16:15, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/06/2013 04:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-01-06 16:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> If you prefer to skip the warning in ipipe, then I will send a
> corresponding patch. The lock
he lock to a Linux version. I thought your concerns
are related to restricting the usage of that services (or services that
call it) in stable 2.6.
Jan
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size:
On 01/06/2013 04:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 16:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> If you prefer to skip the warning in ipipe, then I will send a
>>> corresponding patch. The lock conversion is still necessary for forge,
>>> though.
>>
>>
>> There are other ways around, ipipe_virtual
test.
Jan
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachme
On 01/06/2013 03:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 15:26, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/06/2013 03:20 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-01-06 14:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 01/06/2013 12:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 11:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
he
> warning is new and a false positive. I am opposed to changing intrlock
> into a mutex with a lot of cascading consequences, the ones we see, the
> ones we will discover when people start using the next release.
>
> If you want to benefit from the full instrumentation of the I-pipe
On 01/06/2013 03:26 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/06/2013 03:20 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2013-01-06 14:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2013 12:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
On 2013-01-06 11:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 11:14, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 01/06/2013 03:20 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 14:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/06/2013 12:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-01-06 11:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-01-06 11:14, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 03:09 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> +stat
ipe_virtualize_irq with the root domain stalled. We can skip it in the
> I-pipe core patches when compiling with CONFIG_IPIPE_LEGACY.
Well, we need to support 2.6 for quite a while here, so I'm interested
in fixing such regressions, also on instrumentations, without increasing
our
On 01/06/2013 12:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-06 11:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-01-06 11:14, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2013 03:09 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
+static struct xnvfile_lock_ops vfile_stat_lockops = {
+ .get = xnintr_get_query_lock,
+ .put = xnintr
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20130106/f836c9a4/attachment.pgp>
___
Xenomai mailing list
Xenomai@xenomai.org
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20130106/51171f9c/attachment.pgp>
___
Xenomai mailing list
Xenomai@xenomai.org
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
On 01/03/2013 03:09 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> +static struct xnvfile_lock_ops vfile_stat_lockops = {
> + .get = xnintr_get_query_lock,
> + .put = xnintr_put_query_lock,
> +};
> +
> static struct xnvfile_snapshot stat_vfile = {
> .privsz = sizeof(struct vfile_stat_priv),
> .datas
18 matches
Mail list logo
