On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >>>Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
> >>>
> >>>Here is the header received here :
> >>
> >>It also arrived at my system but the message was extended with another
> >>message orso, I have posted it here. It looks like Ecar
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>>Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
>>>
>>>Here is the header received here :
>>
>>It also arrived at my system but the message was extended with another
>>message orso, I have posted it here. It looks like Ecartis is screwing up.
>
>
> Do yous till have the *full* mes
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>
> > Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
> >
> > Here is the header received here :
>
> It also arrived at my system but the message was extended with another
> message orso, I have posted it here. It looks like Ecartis is s
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
>
> Here is the header received here :
It also arrived at my system but the message was extended with another
message orso, I have posted it here. It looks like Ecartis is screwing up.
--
Groeten,
Peter
Ooops.
-
- Heb je een Dre
Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
Here is the header received here :
Received: from x35.xmailserver.org (69.30.125.51:45177)
by mx.groupeab.com with [XMailGw 1.17 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
id for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:57:53
