On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:09:51AM +0530, Nagesh wrote:
>> Daniel, what in the case when the xml document being parsed is in a
>> different encoding (apart from UTF-8 and UTF-16) and the document does
>> not contain any internal or external subset, in this case,
>> ctxt->encoding is never set.
>>
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 15:56 +0200, Arnold Hendriks wrote:
>
> Can I cheat? :) Given the fact that nothing should appear between
> and , and is always the last tag, its' easiest to
> just ignore them and let the autoclose deal with it...
In practice I expect it's not uncommon to find text aft
ok, thanx for the reply.
do i make the api/interna's crash? Here is my code:
xmlDocPtr doc ;
xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr schema_parser_ptr ;
xmlSchemaPtr schema_ptr ;
xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr schema_valid_ptr ;
int valid;
LIBXML_TEST_VERSION ;
if( (schema_parser_ptr = xmlSchemaNewParse
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 03:56:33PM +0200, Arnold Hendriks wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >I didn't forgot about the issue, and got a bit of time to test yesterday
> >and look at it. First the patch makes senses it fixes a serious problem,
> >there is no leak, that's fine, but the result is still
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> I didn't forgot about the issue, and got a bit of time to test yesterday
> and look at it. First the patch makes senses it fixes a serious problem,
> there is no leak, that's fine, but the result is still problematic
>
>
>
>
> end text
>
>
>
> Basically the err
>
> Hi ,
>
> >Is -1 thought for successfull validation? Can you put a bit doc at least
> on what should be
> >expected for return values?
/**
* xmlSchemaValidateDoc:
* @ctxt: a schema validation context
* @doc: a parsed document tree
*
* Validate a document tree in memory.
*
* Returns 0
Hello all,
I have a valid xsd and xml which i can validate with xmllint tool:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~/cp_comModell/lib/xml] > xmllint --noout --schema
processor.xsd enhanced_processor.xml
enhanced_processor.xml validates
Now if i use xmlSchemaValidateDoc(schema_valid_ptr, doc), it delivers a
Hello All,
for a schema validation: after getting a valid parser ptr from
xmlSchemaNewValidCtxt, is it all
to use the xmlSchemaValidateDoc for right validation? I use the Doc method
cause parsing
is done via xmlReadFile in my code. Then free every ptr?
Cheers,
_
2008/4/22, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:51:38AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Hi again (and sorry for all the noise),
> >
> > Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > > If an application benefits from a different hash function depends on the
> > > vocabulary it uses in i
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:03AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >> Since you seems to be interested in the performances of the hash
> >> algorithm, I tried to drop the string comparisons on lo
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:51:38AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi again (and sorry for all the noise),
>
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > If an application benefits from a different hash function depends on the
> > vocabulary it uses in its XML files. A slow but well distributing hash
> > function per
11 matches
Mail list logo
