Re: Extra pointer motion with current git xf86-input-synaptics

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 06:10:32PM +0100, Magnus Kessler wrote: > Since updating to the current git version of xorg-server, inputproto and > xf86-input-synaptics I observe extra pointer movements for every event > generated by the touchpad. > > Even when not touching the pad and using the button

Re: pixman with and without SSE2 benchmarks?

On 27.09.2008 18:38, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> There is a summary of the performance difference compared to the MMX >> code: >> >> http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/perf-diff > > (Twice as fast on many benchmarks.) > > Note that this is on core 2, which has magnificent SSE performance. > I

Re: [PATCH] Make -nocursor a runtime option to and remove the compile time NULL_ROOT_CURSOR

Hi, On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:20 PM, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Barry Scott wrote: >> Am I right in thinking this only disables the cursor over the root >> window and not over the whole screen? > Yes. > Individual apps have the ability to remove their own cursor - and can't the >

Re: pixman with and without SSE2 benchmarks?

> There is a summary of the performance difference compared to the MMX > code: > > http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/perf-diff (Twice as fast on many benchmarks.) Note that this is on core 2, which has magnificent SSE performance. I haven't tried it, but I'm willing to bet that on Pentium-M an

Extra pointer motion with current git xf86-input-synaptics

Since updating to the current git version of xorg-server, inputproto and xf86-input-synaptics I observe extra pointer movements for every event generated by the touchpad. Even when not touching the pad and using the buttons instead the pointer moves 1 pixel to the top-left which each event (x a

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008/9/23 Jason Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Problem: Many[1] users have killed X by accident.[2] > > Solution idea: Make it harder to kill X by accident. E.g. you could > change the key sequence users must press. > * Maybe require Control+Alt+Backspace then Control-Alt-Y.[3] > * Or require

Problem with Pixmap Depth for Render extension

Problem: Pixmap Depth from XGetGeometry doesn't agree with XRenderCreatePicture. If I create a Pixmap (XCreatePixmap) with a depth of 24 bits, the request to get the Geometry (XGetGeometry) of the created pixmap returns it as 32. Ok, I can accept that. But if I then use the Pixmap in a call to

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

Jason Spiro wrote: > What do you think? Should Xorg change this key sequence? Please vote > "yes" or "no". You can add comments too. If you reply only to me by > private mail, I will eventually summarize your reply to the list. Since I do testing on new drivers it would be inconvenient for me.