corresponding changes in many other declarations).
Doing this right will, however, also be a good check that these string are
not modified by the X11 library code.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner /* compile with:
* gcc -O2 -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -c play.c
*/
#include
#include
#inclu
ing a manpage formatting problem
(made quite some time ago, but I forgot to post it).
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner From a686d6be70f8811838afacf0738eb13a1ec268f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Breitenlohner
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:57:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix manpage formatting
---
man/evde
s:
If the string "$PKG_CONFIG --variable=prefix xt" is a prefix of the string
"$PKG_CONFIG --variable=appdefaultdir xt", then (and only then) replace that
prefix by '${prefix}'. This will then be compatible with distcheck!
regards
Peter Breitenlohn
So please apply.
Thanks
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
to ANSI
C. Thus, please modify the test such that they are included for gcc >= 3.4.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
r is used subsequently
without any test for this condition.
====
with best regards,
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
: patches 20208-20212 have been submitted by me. They correct an
obvious build failure along the lines already applied to app/xedit, but
nevertheless they need independent review and approval.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
a PCI resource at 0x0005/65536. Without that patch this is
erroneously reported as
0x0005/0
on 32Bit LE systems (at least on x86), or as
0x/327680
on 32Bit BE systems. Quite confusing!
Regards,
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL P
apply them. Would you?
Is there a way to move a file between modules while preserving the original
author (git blame) of that file?
Regards,
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
not), and make sure any old installed version of
is removed
3.3.2. Modify the Xorg XTRAP extension not to use int_function and
void_function (may be somewhat complicated)
3.3.3. Remove these declarations from xtrapddmi.h.
Regards,
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
> There is, however, a radically different idea. Originally the app default
> file, e.g., Xmessage was distributed as Xmessage.ad for the sake of case
> insensitive filesystems in order not to cause conflict with the executable
> xmessa
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
> There is actually a much better way to avoid race conditions: whenever there
> are several app-default files, make them depend on a phony target that
> ensures the existence of ./app-defaults.
The phony target I proposed yesterday
Hi Jeremy,
your commit from yesterday for beforelight (Buildfix for case insensitive
file systems) has removed ./Beforelight.ad but failed to add
./app-defaults/Beforelight.ad. Please fix that.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Attached are five tiny patches. Could one of you you please apply them.
In my original message I had overlooked xmh with the same problem, patch is
attached.
In
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
Anyway, attached is a new version which does just the opposite: appending
xorgversion.m4 to xorg-macros.m4.in instead of installing it as a separate
file.
Attached are two patches, the one from yesterday and my proposal for
CWARNFLAGS (created
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Attached are five tiny patches. Could one of you you please apply them.
>
> In order to guard against races with parallel jobs,
ne of you you please apply them.
Regards,
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From 48801cf45c64a0ca9ea1e35142ee975b0a33fdff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:02:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] enabled VPATH build
---
Makefile.am
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
this is in a separate (new) file xorg-changelog-cmd.m4,
such that we can use it before it is installed
meh. we can just depend on xorg-macros 1.2...
Hi Julien,
yes (of course) for all other modules
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> this is in a separate (new) file xorg-changelog-cmd.m4,
>> such that we can use it before it is installed
>
> meh. we can just depend on xorg-macros 1.2...
Hi Julien,
yes (of course) for all other modules, but not for xorg-macros which is
about to ins
al or conditional (e.g., via
--enable-extra-warnings); yet to be decided.
I'm not so sure about -pedantic for gcc, that warns about 'long long', extra
long strings, and others we can hardly avoid.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From 597894712187f6c3941dcc
EFUN([XORG_CHANGELOG_CMD], [
CHANGELOG_RULE=''
AC_SUBST([CHANGELOG_CMD])
]) # XORG_CHANGELOG_CMD
in configure.ac:
XORG_CHANGELOG_CMD
and in the top-level Makefile.am:
ChangeLog:
@CHANGELOG_CMD@
===
That way the det
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> this very same problem occurs in many (most?) modules. If you'd apply them I
>> could prepare patches for that (against current git).
>>
>> There are, however, two or three related problems that maybe should be
>> addressed at the same time.
>>
>> (1) I
hem to you, provided you'd agree to apply them. If so, please also
let me know your opinion about the additional warnings (never, conditional,
or unconditional).
Cheers,
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
hat another xfs process is already running. This never happens
because StorePid always return either 0 or -1, and would be problematic
because there may well be two daemons using different ports. Fact is,
however, that when I try to start a second daemon on the same port, that
process overwrites the
Yesterday I sent this to the list, but not being subsribed it was of course
rejected.
regards
Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:05:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alan Coopers
25 matches
Mail list logo