This transfer of display is already implemented in the GTK tookit,
though there are serious loose ends. There is a teleport application to
signal a window to migrate.
The loose ends are:
o last I looked, while the window got moved, the toolkit retained an
open connection to the original s
Harald Braumann wrote:
> > It is an application (or maybe toolkit) level problem: handle the
> > event that the X display connection is being closed better than by
> > killing the application and allow it to reconnect to a new display
> > later (through some communication protocol).
>
> But coul
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:02:38 +0200
Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is an application (or maybe toolkit) level problem: handle the
> event that the X display connection is being closed better than by
> killing the application and allow it to reconnect to a new display
> later (throug
David Greaves wrote:
> > - Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
>
> Agreed, it's about time X supported changing the DISPLAY out from under an
> application. a "follow-me" type feature.
This is something which would be far easier to achieve at the toolkit
leve
--- On Sat, 10/11/08, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Magnus Kessler wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 October 2008, Prasad H.L. wrote:
> >> This is what I have in mind.
> >>
> >> - Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and
> display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
> >> - Let us say, a process 'p1' runn
Prasad H.L. schreef:
> I am active user of X.org and I admire the power and features that X.org
> provides to the users. I regularly use exported display over an ssh session
> and operate. I commend the developers for such a wonder piece of software.
> However, I would like to know one thing as
On Saturday 11 October 2008, Magnus Kessler wrote:
>On Saturday 11 October 2008, Prasad H.L. wrote:
>> This is what I have in mind.
>>
>> - Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
>> - Let us say, a process 'p1' running under privileges of user 'u' opens a
>> window
Magnus Kessler wrote:
> On Saturday 11 October 2008, Prasad H.L. wrote:
>> This is what I have in mind.
>>
>> - Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
>> - Let us say, a process 'p1' running under privileges of user 'u' opens a
>> window on :0 of m1. - I do an 'ssh
On Saturday 11 October 2008, Prasad H.L. wrote:
> This is what I have in mind.
>
> - Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
> - Let us say, a process 'p1' running under privileges of user 'u' opens a
> window on :0 of m1. - I do an 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in xter
--- On Sat, 10/11/08, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed, it's about time X supported changing the
> DISPLAY out from under an
> application. a "follow-me" type feature.
>
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/archives/1996/1273.html
>
> http://fixunix.com/xwindows/91803-xmove-ssh.html
>
Prasad H.L. wrote:
> This is what I have in mind.
>
> - Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
Agreed, it's about time X supported changing the DISPLAY out from under an
application. a "follow-me" type feature.
http://www.sunmanagers.org/archives/1996/1273.html
This is what I have in mind.
- Consider display :0 on machine 1 (m1) and display :0 on machine 2 (m2).
- Let us say, a process 'p1' running under privileges of user 'u' opens a
window on :0 of m1.
- I do an 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in xterm on :0 of m2 and login to m1.
- Now, from that xterm wi
I am active user of X.org and I admire the power and features that X.org
provides to the users. I regularly use exported display over an ssh session and
operate. I commend the developers for such a wonder piece of software. However,
I would like to know one thing as described below.
Consider a
13 matches
Mail list logo
