moved from https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1474956 to
https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/issues/11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474956
Title:
Clump::updateProperties discreti
moved from https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1474956 to
https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/issues/11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474956
Title:
Clump::updateProperties discreti
So old that I didn't bother getting back to it, but if someone wants to
implement it... hence the wishlist :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474956
Title:
Clump::updateProperties d
Sounds like a good fix to me.
Klaus
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Bruno Chareyre <1474...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> ** Changed in: yade
>Importance: Medium => Wishlist
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
> developers, which is subscribed to Yade
** Changed in: yade
Importance: Medium => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474956
Title:
Clump::updateProperties discretization not defined robustly
Status in Yade:
Co
>>it should be downward compatible
>Sure of that?
No. I just thought about users, that already use discretization option to get
mass of clumps (like me ...)
If the users now use the same script with new yade version, it will give
different results (maybe unnoticed by the user).
>As far as iner
>it should be downward compatible
Sure of that? It makes things more complex without adding any additional
flexibility.
As far as inertia matters, there is no point in subdiscretizing this tiny
sphere which is 1000 times smaller that the clump.
But if you really want to do it you can: discretiza
Hi,
I agree, that in some special cases aabb should be used for
discretization, but...
... it should be downward compatible (user can decide if he/she want the
discretization this way or this way ... so a new bool is needed in
Clump::updateProperties: discretionAabb = false [default])
... it n
** Changed in: yade
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: yade
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bruno Chareyre (bruno-chareyre)
** Changed in: yade
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to
9 matches
Mail list logo
