[zfs-discuss] snv_70 - snv_66: ZPL_VERSION 2, File system version mismatch ....?

2007-07-20 Thread Jürgen Keil
Yesterday I was surprised because an old snv_66 kernel (installed as a new zfs rootfs) refused to mount. Error message was Mismatched versions: File system is version 2 on-disk format, which is incompatible with this software version 1! I tried to prepare that snv_66 rootfs when

Re: [zfs-discuss] snv_70 - snv_66: ZPL_VERSION 2, File system version mismatch ....?

2007-07-20 Thread Tim Foster
hi Jürgen, On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 05:04 -0700, Jürgen Keil wrote: How about a new feature for zpool create and zfs create to allow creation of a zpool or zfs that is not using the newest version but some older version Yep, that's there already - PSARC 2007/328 gives zfs upgrade and you can

[zfs-discuss] Yet another zfs vs. vxfs comparison...

2007-07-20 Thread Mikael Kjerrman
Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn't find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs and 2530 jbod

2007-07-20 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Joel, Wednesday, July 18, 2007, 8:19:56 PM, you wrote: JM Hi Robert, JM It should work. We have not had the time or resources to test it (we are JM busy qualifying the 2530 (SAS array) with an upcoming MPxIO enabled MPT JM driver and SATA drive support). JM I do not know if MPxIO will

Re: [zfs-discuss] more love for databases

2007-07-20 Thread eric kustarz
On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Alderman, Sean wrote: This is good news, thank you for the blog! If I may ask a couple of questions to the community on the topic of OLTP workload and ZFS... 1. When evaluating ZFS for our Oracle systems (heavy 8K uncached workload), our DBAs used the ZFS