On 11/24/12 5:51 PM, "Erik Trimble" wrote:
>On 11/24/2012 5:17 AM, Edmund White wrote:
>> Heh, I wouldn't be using G5's for ZFS purposes now. G6 and better
>> ProLiants are a better deal for RAM capacity and CPU core countŠ
>>
>> Either way, I also use HP systems as the basis for my ZFS/Nexenta
On 11/24/2012 5:17 AM, Edmund White wrote:
Heh, I wouldn't be using G5's for ZFS purposes now. G6 and better
ProLiants are a better deal for RAM capacity and CPU core countŠ
Either way, I also use HP systems as the basis for my ZFS/Nexenta storage
systems. Typically DL380's, since I have expansi
Ian Collins wrote:
I look after a remote server that has two iSCSI pools. The volumes for
each pool are sparse volumes and a while back the target's storage
became full, causing weird and wonderful corruption issues until they
manges to free some space.
Since then, one pool has been reasonably
Heh, I wouldn't be using G5's for ZFS purposes now. G6 and better
ProLiants are a better deal for RAM capacity and CPU core countŠ
Either way, I also use HP systems as the basis for my ZFS/Nexenta storage
systems. Typically DL380's, since I have expansion room for either 16
drive bays, or for usin
