Joerg Schilling wrote:
> David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Al Hopper wrote:
>>> So back to patent portfolios: yes there will be (public and private)
>>> posturing; yes there will be negotiations; and, ultimately, there will
>>> be a
e much
less helpful.
--
David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ar from "not demanding anything". Neither company comes out with
any credit, and regardless of the legal outcomes, both deserve to lose from
this affair in the court of public opinion.
(And yes, I do mean "extort". The whole patent system has degenerated into
legalize
ge this acceleration.
Another possible argument is that if the drive moves slightly, so does the
connector to it, which seems like a bad idea.
--
David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
write to the disk, unless the filesystem is specifically mounted
with options that prevent any physical writes.
> Of course everything that you and Tim and Casper said is true,
> but I'm still inclined to try that scenario.
I don't under
