[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and "rm -rf"

2006-08-03 Thread Tom Simpson
Well, You're spot on. Turns out that our datacentre boys change the umask of root to 0027. :-( This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu

[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and "rm -rf"

2006-08-02 Thread Tom Simpson
I'm not at the machine to check at the moment, but I didn't create the /u05 mountpoint manually. ZFS created it automatically when I did :- % zfs set mountpoint=/u05 zfspool/u05 You would hope that ZFS didn't get the underlying permissions wrong! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and "rm -rf"

2006-08-02 Thread Tom Simpson
I'm not at the machine to check at the moment, but I didn't create the /u05 mountpoint manually. ZFS created it automatically when I did :- % zfs set mountpoint=/u05 zfspool/u05 You would hope that ZFS didn't get the underlying permissions wrong! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and "rm -rf"

2006-08-02 Thread Tom Simpson
Actually, just tried this on a non-cloned filesystem with the same results. I can't believe there is a bug with "rm -rf", so is this something to do with ACLs ? Help! Tom This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-d

[zfs-discuss] Clones and "rm -rf"

2006-08-02 Thread Tom Simpson
Can anyone help? I have a cloned filesystem (/u05) from a snapshot of /u02. The owner/group of the clone is (oracle:dba). If I do oracle% cd /u05/app oracle% rm -rf R2DIR .. All the files in the R2DIR tree are removed, but none of the (sub)directories. If I run the same "rm -rf" as root, the