Jan Hendrik Mangold wrote:
Hey Matt
were you able to reproduce this? I am using the straight S10U2 bits. I
can give you access to the system, if you want. One last piece of
information should be that my pools are created of files, due to lack of
disks for experimenting.
Yep, this is 100% re
Hey Mattwere you able to reproduce this? I am using the straight S10U2 bits. I can give you access to the system, if you want. One last piece of information should be that my pools are created of files, due to lack of disks for experimenting.On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:04 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:Jan He
Jan Hendrik Mangold wrote:
I didn't ask the original question, but I have a scenario where I
want to use clone as well and encounter a (designed?) behaviour I am
trying to understand.
I create a filesystem A with ZFS and modify it to a point where I
create a snapshot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then I clo
> > The initial idea was to make a dataset/snapshot and
> clone (fast) and then separate the clone from its
> snapshot. The clone could be then used as a new
> independant dataset.
> >
> > The send/receive subcommands are probably the only
> way to duplicate a dataset.
>
> I'm still not sure I u
