comment below...
William Papolis wrote:
> I checked this out at the Solaris internals link above, because I am also
> interested in the best setup for ZFS.
>
> Assuming 500GB drives ...
>
> It turns out that the most cost effective option (meaning the least "lost"
> drive space due to redundan
I checked this out at the Solaris internals link above, because I am also
interested in the best setup for ZFS.
Assuming 500GB drives ...
It turns out that the most cost effective option (meaning the least "lost"
drive space due to redundancy is to ...
1. Setup RaidZ of up to 8 drives (All mus
David Runyon sun.com> writes:
>
> I'm trying to get maybe 200 MB/sec over NFS for large movie files (need
(I assume you meant 200 Mb/sec with a lower case "b".)
> large capacity to hold all of them). Are there any rules of thumb on how
> much RAM is needed to handle this (probably RAIDZ for all
I'm trying to get maybe 200 MB/sec over NFS for large movie files (need large
capacity to hold all of them). Are there any rules of thumb on how much RAM is
needed to handle this (probably RAIDZ for all the disks) with zfs, and how
large a server should be used? The throughput required is not
