On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 01:30 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
>
>> My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
>> object_ref table and free this space?
>>
>
> Certainly. However, most of the 23 GB probably
nt, no references to unexisting or empty transactions.
So, information to garbage collection seems to be using a lot of space.
My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
object_ref table and free this space?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (http://www.kmkey.co
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 08:42 AM, Santi Camps wrote:
>
>> The objective is to duplicate a storage using different mount points.
>> For instance, if we have Database1 -> mount_point_1 , create
>> Database2 and Database3 as
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 07:41 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
>> On 02/10/2011 06:30 AM, Santi Camps wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to move a database copy a relstorage zodb and having some
>>> issues. The original
:bytea;
update transaction set username=replace(username::text, 'helpdesk_src',
'redesistemas')::bytea;
Where is stored the information about parent -> children objects ? Is the
prev_tid field of object_state table ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (htt
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 05:17 AM, Santi Camps wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm using relstorage for a long time with very good results. Until
>> know, I also use database adapters like ZPsycopgDA to connect the same
&g
_with_store(execute_query, query=query)
print rows.fetchone()
The question is, can I go on ? Or use same connections than relstorage
could cause problems at ZODB level ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (http://www.kmkey.com)
Earcon S.
m, but I report it to you to be known
(in fact, I don't know if the problem is in relstorage or in memcache). I'm
working with python2.4.6 and python-memcache module version 1.40
Thanks a lot for this new release of relstorage, the performance testings
are amazing
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hac
er that, this objects are
never removed from memory, but the question is why they are loaded.
Any ideas ?
Thanks
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope
to poll-interval parameter ? I've leaved default values there
Thanks again
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing
sistent).
>
No, all them inherit from CMF PortalContent, and this from Persistent,
so there is not the problem.
I'm using RelStorage, but this shouldn't affect. I will try the same
tests in a FileStorage to be sure
Thanks for your help
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earco
r clears this from memory, and after some hours of
intensive work, the server RAM is finished
Is that normal ? I'm making some mistake ? Anybody knows any way to solve it ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
_
my experiments with
> packing your database has revealed some unexpected behavior. I'm going to
> look into it.
>
Thanks again, Shane. We'll fix the script, try removing this 2
transactions and packing on a copy of the database, to see what
happens. The last pack on a copy works, b
0;" should tell
> you there is only one state in the database for OID 0. Packing should work
> fine then. It seemed to do the right thing on my copy, but I don't have
> your application code to check it.
>
Thank you very much for that information. I really could not be a
ose when packing (nothing references
nothing). So, the mystery is not in Relstorage but in the data.
The only right ways to solve it is to disable pack-gc or try to fill
this tables correctly. Do you know any simple way to do it ?
Perhaps an export / import should fill this tables
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Santi Camps wrote:
>> We've been using RelStorage 1.1.c1 in production environments over
>> postgresql 8.1 for some time. It has been working really fine, but
>> yesterday we have a big problem packing a re
e.py", line
255, in _log_keyerror
rows = adapter.iter_object_history(cursor, oid_int)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/relstorage/adapters/common.py",
line 229, in iter_object_history
raise KeyError(oid)
KeyError: 7L
Anybody knows what could happen ? Could be a problem access
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> Santi Camps wrote:
>>> I've 8 zope's with 4 threads each one, and I've seen more than 50 open
>>> connections used by relstorage. I was hopping
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santi Camps wrote:
>> RelStorage is really fantastic, I'm starting to use it in some
>> production environments with postgresql 8.1 and works really fine.
>> But I've observed the
I'm not able to debug ZODB and understant what's
happening. Could be related to store files in the ZODB (so, in
postgres through relstorage) ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
Earcon S.L. - http://www.earcon.com
- http://www.kmkey.com
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
