[Zope-CMF] Re: Test broken on 1.6 branch

2005-11-20 Thread Rob Miller
Florent Guillaume wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: Note that the current breakage on the 1.6 branch is the kind of stuff that made me reluctant to borrow the trunk's CMFSetup/GenericSetup. In this case, it isn't really fair to complain about the test breakage, in that the whole point of the branch is

[Zope-CMF] Re: Test broken on 1.6 branch

2005-11-19 Thread Rob Miller
i sent this message about 12 hours ago, via gmane, but i haven't seen it come through yet, am resending. apologies if it shows up twice. Florent Guillaume wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: Note that the current breakage on the 1.6 branch is the kind of stuff that made me reluctant to borrow the trun

[Zope-CMF] Re: Test broken on 1.6 branch

2005-11-18 Thread Florent Guillaume
Tres Seaver wrote: Note that the current breakage on the 1.6 branch is the kind of stuff that made me reluctant to borrow the trunk's CMFSetup/GenericSetup. In this case, it isn't really fair to complain about the test breakage, in that the whole point of the branch is to find and fix such thing

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Test broken on 1.6 branch

2005-11-18 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: >>> Julien Anguenot wrote: >>> > ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail > on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them > into account. > >

[Zope-CMF] Re: Test broken on 1.6 branch

2005-11-18 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: > Julien Anguenot wrote: > >>>ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail >>>on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them >>>into account. >>> >>>Is it fine with everybody ? Note

[Zope-CMF] Re: Test broken on 1.6 branch

2005-11-18 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Julien Anguenot wrote: > ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail > on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them > into account. > > Is it fine with everybody ? +1. Tres. - --