Dieter Maurer wrote:
I worked a bit with ZopeHead.
Required CMF patches attached.
Thanks! Based on your patches I made a checkin to CMF HEAD.
Cheers, Yuppie
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
Evan,
absolute_url(1) was broken (by my definition of broken) basically since
the introduction of VHM, which means the better part of 2 years.
Naturally, there is code now that relies on this (broken) behavior.
This does however not mean it should not be fixed!
The ugly part is that the
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 09:35, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
[...]
So by my definition, the URL (relative or not) should *always* include
eventual _vh_xyz parts. If what one really needs is related to the
physical layout of the ZODB, there is always getPhysicalPath().
+1
URLs are in fact just
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
IMHO, this is broken behaviour. If you try to use an URL to locate an
object, the only sane behaviour is to feed this URL to an URL api
(probably in the REQUEST object) to get it mapped to a physical path.
(Un)RestrictedTraverse can do this, right? Or does that
I hope I'm posting to the right mailing list. There were so many to decide
from.
I've just been introduced to Zope, and am curious on how it will fit into my
company's plans.
I'm currently learning Java, and was starting to learn the RedHat Web
Application Framework. I've found Zope in an
Aaron Paxson wrote:
I hope I'm posting to the right mailing list. There were so many to decide
from.
This should've probably been directed to the main Zope list; zope-dev is
for development *of* Zope.
I've just been introduced to Zope, and am curious on how it will fit into my
company's plans.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:35:38PM +0100, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
Note that this is one of my main points: It will be of little use to
document usage of BASEPATH1+absolute_url(1) when '/'+absolute_url(1)
appears to work (until it is far too late).
As a frequent (ab)user of
Jim Fulton wrote:
Steve Alexander and I will be hosting a sprint in Fredericksburg
January 12-14, 2004:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/SteveVisitingFredericksburgSprint
A possible topic is Zope 2 to Zope 3 transition and working on
Zope 2.9.
Before independent discussions erupt here, see
On Monday 08 December 2003 11:35, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
Note that this is one of my main points: It will be of little use to
document usage of BASEPATH1+absolute_url(1) when '/'+absolute_url(1)
appears to work (until it is far too late).
We can fix this social problem by providing an easy
Thanks for resonding, even though there was a better list! I've got some
fantastic replies, and was overwhelmed with the answers!
I'll definately give Zope a try.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Sabaini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Aaron Paxson
Paul Winkler wrote:
As a frequent (ab)user of '/'+absolute_url(1), which did indeed
bite me when i deployed to an inside out apache setup,
I thought I'd try this out... I think you
meant BASEPATH1+'/'+absolute_url(1)?
I would like to know:
1. Exactly what is an inside out apache setup.
2. What is
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:58:12PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
As a frequent (ab)user of '/'+absolute_url(1), which did indeed
bite me when i deployed to an inside out apache setup,
I thought I'd try this out... I think you
meant BASEPATH1+'/'+absolute_url(1)?
I
Paul Winkler wrote:
See the About tab on VHM.
OK, good.
Inside out is mentioned
numerous times in this thread.
Yeah, I know, but I was getting confused to what it actually ment.
The result that I got by doing BASEPATH1+'/'+absolute_url(1)
as described in my previous message. I thought that was
After reading this paragraph for the third time I realized you have a
very good point here.
But
quote by=Evan Simpson
Relative in this context refers to the concept of a relative path
as used in rfc1808, not to a relationship with a Zope object. It is
meant for use in situations such as
We are trying to make a 'folderish' (WebDAV Collection) class appear as
a WebDAV Resource to WebDAV clients. I won't go into the reasons why we
want to do this unless someone is interested. We have made several
attempts at this but have been unsuccessful to date. Rather than go
into all the
Jeremy Hylton wrote at 2003-12-7 23:01 -0500:
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 08:15, Dieter Maurer wrote:
ATT: replacing the cache without clearing it can lead to huge
memory leaks (everything in the old cache is leaked!).
Without commenting on the rest of the bug report, I should mention that
caches
Stefan H. Holek wrote at 2003-12-8 12:35 +0100:
...
The ugly part is that the behavior of absolute_url(1) changes suddenly
when the Vhost configuration starts to include inside-out parts
(_vh_xyz). This means that is is possible to break (seemingly) working
code by reconfiguring Apache. :-(
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 13:17, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jeremy Hylton wrote at 2003-12-7 23:01 -0500:
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 08:15, Dieter Maurer wrote:
ATT: replacing the cache without clearing it can lead to huge
memory leaks (everything in the old cache is leaked!).
Without commenting on
Stefan H. Holek wrote at 2003-12-8 19:14 +0100:
...
So, what do we want relative to mean for absolute_url?
I spelled it out more precisely in a recent post (after
rereading RFC2693). In my view '/' + obj.absolute_url(1)
should implement the absolute path relative URL for obj
(as defined by
Dieter Maurer wrote at 2003-12-7 14:15 +0100:
Playing with Zope Head (as of 2003-12-04) revealed problems with
refresh.
Turns out to be a bug in ZODB.Connection.Connection._setDB:
ConnectionObjectReader used the old cache while
refresh cause a new cache to be installed later
in
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 15:36, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote at 2003-12-7 14:15 +0100:
Playing with Zope Head (as of 2003-12-04) revealed problems with
refresh.
Turns out to be a bug in ZODB.Connection.Connection._setDB:
ConnectionObjectReader used the old cache while
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
@@ -158,8 +158,6 @@
-self._reader = ConnectionObjectReader(self, self._cache,
- self._db._classFactory)
@@ -168,6 +166,8 @@
+self._reader = ConnectionObjectReader(self, self._cache,
+
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:14:28PM +0100, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
After reading this paragraph for the third time I realized you have a
very good point here.
But
quote by=Evan Simpson
Relative in this context refers to the concept of a relative path
as used in rfc1808, not to a
Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm having serious trouble in getting HEAD running in Windows. Obviously,
configure doesn't work. :-)
I found something on zope.org telling me to run python inst\configure.py
and in in turn tells me to run nmake build. This builds Zope, but creates no
z2.py or runzope.py
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:24:04PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Maybe, my contribution has not been read. Thus, I try again:
/ + absolute_url(1) should implement the notion
of absolute-path URL reference (see RFC2396 section 5).
This means, that the receiving browser
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 15:56, Yuppie wrote:
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
@@ -158,8 +158,6 @@
-self._reader = ConnectionObjectReader(self, self._cache,
- self._db._classFactory)
@@ -168,6 +166,8 @@
+self._reader =
Eric Roby wrote:
We are trying to make a 'folderish' (WebDAV Collection) class appear as
a WebDAV Resource to WebDAV clients. I won't go into the reasons why we
want to do this unless someone is interested. We have made several
attempts at this but have been unsuccessful to date. Rather than
27 matches
Mail list logo
