On 7/3/09 1:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> In general, I find deploying as zip files to be an anti-feature. In
>> seems especially insane when extension modules are involved.
>
> The only way to deploy *any* non-toy app on GAE is via zip file(s) (I
> would think a single big one would be best), due
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae
>> friendly ;-)
>> zope.interface and zope.i18nmessageid have 'c' optimisations which
>> obviousl
Hi Tobias
Cool
Just something to note google recently upped the file limit to 3000 so
don't be too agressive
generating those zips ;-)
T
>
> Great idea to examine EGG-INFO/SOURCES.txt, Jim! I just added this to
> my recipe (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/rod.recipe.appengine) and got
> rid of the
On 03.07.2009, at 12:33, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone
>> upates (via buildout etc a) module they need to remember to
>> remove the recreated file before redeploying th
On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Jim
>
> That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone
> upates (via buildout etc a) module they need to remember to
> remove the recreated file before redeploying the app, unfortunately I
> am not sure I see a way r
Hi Jim
That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone
upates (via buildout etc a) module they need to remember to
remove the recreated file before redeploying the app, unfortunately I
am not sure I see a way reliable way of specifying that these files
should be deleted
On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae
> friendly ;-)
> zope.interface and zope.i18nmessageid have 'c' optimisations which
> obviously don't work under app engine.
>
>
> When these modules are imported you g
Tobias Rodäbel wrote:
> Sorry, I don't agree. We assume an imp.load_dynamic function from what
> we read in the python documentation. But the implementation in GAE
> does not provide the expected api. So the NotImplementedError seems
> absolutely correct to me (see
> http://www.python.org/do
On 03.07.2009, at 10:38, Chris Withers wrote:
> Tim Hoffman wrote:
>> gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/
>> _zope_i18nmessageid_message.py",
>> line 6, in __bootstrap__
>>imp.load_dynamic(__name__,__file__)
>> File "/base/python_dist/lib/python2.5/py_imp.py", line 116, in
>> load
I suppose that depends on your point of view.
They exception is actually saying that imp.load_dynamic is not
implemented, not that it can't load the dynamic module so I would say
in my opinion that it isn't a bug.
Rgds
Tim
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Tim Hoffman wrote
Tim Hoffman wrote:
> gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/_zope_i18nmessageid_message.py",
> line 6, in __bootstrap__
> imp.load_dynamic(__name__,__file__)
> File "/base/python_dist/lib/python2.5/py_imp.py", line 116, in load_dynamic
> raise NotImplementedError('This function is no
Hi,
yes, I'd really appreciate such a modification. Then I could delete
the regarding code in my rod.recipe.appengine, which provides a dummy
implementation of imp.load_dynamic.
Tim, do you have a list of the concerning packages? I could help
making these changes. A good reason to file an a
12 matches
Mail list logo
