Hi,
On 12/21/2010 10:05 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Thanks for giving it a shot Christian! I always read the meeting notes,
> if I didn't participate.
Thanks, good to know that. :)
--
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
ht
On 2010-12-22 11:13, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads
>>> since July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that
>>> are not part of the standard Plone/Zope
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads
> > since July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that
> > are not part of the standard Plone/Zope 2/Bluebream dependency tree.
>
> If only thos
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> So you're saying this is a bug in z3c.rml after all? It ends up not
> using separate subprocesses for each test?
It runs all tests twice, once with and once without the subprocess version.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:46:55PM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday, December 20, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with z3c.rml nor with ReportLab's form code, so I'd
> > appreciate if people who wrote the test could help with the smaller
> > reproducible example.
>
> Tha
On 2010-12-22 00:22, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> I didn't look at the RML failures. I'm not even sure we should be
>> running them, at least not every night, as I doubt the package is at all
>> widely used (but I'm willing to be shouted down ;).
>
Thanks for giving it a shot Christian! I always read the meeting notes,
if I didn't participate.
- C
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 19:46 +0100, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during my holidays I evaluated where I spend my time. I feel that the
> weekly IRC meetings in their current form do not fos
Hi,
during my holidays I evaluated where I spend my time. I feel that the
weekly IRC meetings in their current form do not foster more development
or get stuff done on the maintenance side of things but keep rather
reiterating on the things we feel we should do.
As they keep adding more mainte
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Tres Seaver wrote:
> I didn't look at the RML failures. I'm not even sure we should be
> running them, at least not every night, as I doubt the package is at all
> widely used (but I'm willing to be shouted down ;).
I am frequently getting bug reports from users. An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yay, getting closer to green. Marius, thank you very much for your
efforts over the past week!
> Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
> From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org
> Date: Mon Dec 20 15:30:02 EST 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pip
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Dec 20 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Dec 21 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 44 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 21 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED : win
11 matches
Mail list logo
