David Cain wrote:
Running Zope 2.6.0 (binary release, python 2.1, linux2-x86
I would like to import the ClassSecurityInfo class from a Python script
Why? it would be intrinsicaly unsafe to do so, given that ClassSecurityInfo
instances are how you manipulate security assertions in python.
Ulti
Magnus Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is the ZPT i18n-support described?
>
> I cant find anything thats up2date.
http://www.zope.org//Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/ZPTInternationalizationSupport
It's in Zope3Proposals but has actually been backported to Zope 2.
Florent
Hi,
I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to
have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to
work.
--
Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like
solitary confinement.
___
Zo
Hi,
I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to
have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to
work.
Yes, it IS indeed a problem if there is no single Zope version out there
that can be used without patches. 2.6.0 has the DateTime bug, the
2
--On Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 20:31 +0100 Joachim Werner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to
have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to
work.
Yes, it IS indeed a problem if there is no single Z
> > I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to
> > have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to
> > work.
>
> Yes, it IS indeed a problem if there is no single Zope version out there
> that can be used without patches. 2.6.0 has the DateTime
Brian R Brinegar wrote at 2003-1-21 18:48 -0500:
> I've got a product (Basic content object) Called HTMLBlock. When I start
> my ZEO Client with the product installed I don't recieve any error
> messages. The product is listed in the "Select type to add..." menu.
> However if I try to add an in
Ivo van der Wijk wrote at 2003-1-22 16:10 +0100:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:57:20AM +, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a
> > > way to optimize this?
> >
> > 1. Obviously, use fewer threads. Do you have a component that otherwise
> > benefits from many threads?
> >
>