On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:08:17 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote.
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 09:54, Tadashi Matsumoto wrote:
If you write a test for this, I'll check it in.
I have made a test. It works well (perhaps).
This test program is small, so I have attached in this mail.
Tadashi
Jim Fulton wrote:
Jeff Shell wrote:
I understand why this is happening, but it's (obviously) not what I
want to have happen. I want MY skin layer's declaration of
'contents.html' to win out. It actually works for all container types,
so maybe I need to declare it for a root Zope container
Gary Poster wrote:
I'm pretty sure there's a proposal on the wiki somewhere with Jim's
full lookup algorithm that you want, but the iro for the pertinent
object(s) usually gets me far enough.
That might be the proposal you mentioned
Hi,
giving recommendations about security, we advice everyone to put their
communication on protected lines. E.g. use HTTPS.
As we are targetting Zope 3.3, I think twisted can be the recommended
configuration option for Zope to run with.
How do you feel about the use of the HTTPS server of
Christian Theune wrote:
giving recommendations about security, we advice everyone to put their
communication on protected lines. E.g. use HTTPS.
As we are targetting Zope 3.3, I think twisted can be the recommended
configuration option for Zope to run with.
Agreed.
How do you feel about the
On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:28 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
How do you feel about the use of the HTTPS server
of twisted instead of requiring the user to channel
it through an external HTTPS server, e.g. apache?
[...]
So, I think Apache has its place in front of
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2005, 06:39 -0500 schrieb Rob Page:
On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:28 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, I think Apache has its place in front of Twisted,
just like Apache now has its place in front of
ZServer.
+1. IIUC, the C2 certification is
configuration-dependent
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2005, 13:03 +0100 schrieb Christian Theune:
Ok. So in favor of the mainstream (and trusted!) configuration, I'll go
for using the standard Twisted/HTTP server in combination with a local
Apache that provides SSL to the web browser.
Actually that also means that I
Hello Christian,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:30:46 AM, you wrote:
...
So my question is: Does anybody think it will be a problem for Zope
beeing CC certified only on Linux?
Cheers,
Christian
I'll say maybe a small survey should be done how many people are using
other OS's.
One more
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:13:04PM +0100, Adam Groszer wrote:
One more thing is that maybe you cannot force your next client to use
linux. I think big companies are (were) devoted to M$ or maybe Solaris for
high availability. Linux is getting into the picture slowly.
The company I work for
Hello Stephan,
I'm just thinking about the following:
IDocTypeEditForm = copy.deepcopy(IDocType)
IDocTypeEditForm.getDescriptionFor('processDef').readonly=True
what do you think about that?
I'd like to keep it really simple and so reduce the opportunities of
errors.
Tuesday, December 13,
jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Without going much deeper into the way zope uses database connections.
Wouldn't MySQL:Ping solve the reconnect Problem.
That's what I used in my old C++ projects.
Some kind of ensureConnected at the right place.
Jürgen
Thanks! I'll look into it.
-Jim Washington
On Dec 14, 2005, at 4:56 AM, Dominik Huber wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
I'm pretty sure there's a proposal on the wiki somewhere with
Jim's full lookup algorithm that you want, but the iro for the
pertinent object(s) usually gets me far enough.
That might be the proposal you mentioned
Jeff Shell wrote:
On 12/13/05, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Shell wrote:
...
Going through a lot of debugging, it looks as through it has to do
with how things are ranked in
zope.interface.adapter.AdapterLookup.lookup() for multi-adapters.
Yup.
I don't know enough about the
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Jeff Shell wrote:
I understand why this is happening, but it's (obviously) not what I
want to have happen. I want MY skin layer's declaration of
'contents.html' to win out. It actually works for all container types,
so maybe I need to declare it for
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
although Zope runs on platforms different than Linux, we'll have a hard
time to certify it on multiple platforms. Usually a very specific system
configuration is given, like Windows 2003 with Service Pack XY and
Hotfixes A, B and C.
I think we can get around that by
Hi,
I've removed the references to IContentContainer within the trunk and
deprecate the IContentContainer interface.
There's a last reference within
/home/zopes/Zope3/src/zope/app/workflow/stateful/browser/configure.zcml
There's another important last reference within
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2005, 10:47 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Yes. The customers of ours most likely to care about this
use Windows. I would say in general, for better or worse, the decision
makers who would care about CC would also care about Windows. I suspect that
the decision makers
Hi,
after having posted this to what I guess is the wrong list (all hail gmane
group names...) and having received no answer, I'll repost it here:
I noticed that zope.app.file.File does not inherit from
zope.app.container.contained.Contained. This does not stop a file from,
e.g., getting added
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
fred-win.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by '':
Build Source Stamp: None
Blamelist:
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Windows
2000 zc-bbwin.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by '':
Build Source Stamp: None
Blamelist:
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.2 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by '':
Build Source Stamp: None
Blamelist:
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
22 matches
Mail list logo
