Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Fwd: JDK bug 8078516

[Philip Race]

Yes ... offline to Torgeir I questioned the closing as a dup.
Need to look at these carefully to see if we should reopen or
file a new issue but it would be an enhancement request, not a bug.

-phil.

On 8/2/16, 9:07 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
I suppose that this is why JDK-8078516 was filed, and it was closed as 
a duplicate, because another bug provided a way to use LCD rendering 
on OSX to opaque surface +  workaround in swing, fixed the bug of the 
submitter. Probably we should file another bug as a replacement of 
8078516.


On 01.08.16 18:03, Philip Race wrote:
Transparency of the surface has always disabled LCD sub-pixel in Java 
2D.

Same happens on windows. The labels at the bottom
are drawn in greyscale.

-phil.

On 8/1/16, 7:55 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:

Ok, am asking since subpixel rendering works and is usable in most
situations, except for the odd corner case when drawing over existing
content in transparent surfaces.

See eg. this screenshot of netbeans, with nice subpixel rendered text
in the editor, while the labels on the buttons at the bottom have
artifacts since they for some reason are drawn twice.

 Inline images 1

On 2 August 2016 at 00:49, Kevin Rushforth > wrote:

Phil will be able to comment on this further. All I can confirm is
that 8078526 is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, so it is no
longer an open bug.

-- Kevin


Torgeir Veimo wrote:

I'm fairly sure it's the correct bug id, although I don't have
access to view it myself.

Bug 8078526 is about supporting (without artifacts) subpixel
rendering to transparent surfaces.

Bug 8087201 is about speeding up subpixel rendering.

On 2 August 2016 at 00:39, Kevin Rushforth
>
wrote:

Are you sure you have the right Bug ID? That bug (which is
not publicly visible), is closed as a duplicate of 8087201,
which was fixed in JDK 9 and 8u66 over a year ago.

-- Kevin



Torgeir Veimo wrote:

Is there any more work done on JDK bug 8078516?
--
-Tor



--
-Tor





--
-Tor

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Fwd: JDK bug 8078516

[Philip Race]

Transparency of the surface has always disabled LCD sub-pixel in Java 2D.
Same happens on windows. The labels at the bottom
are drawn in greyscale.

-phil.

On 8/1/16, 7:55 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Ok, am asking since subpixel rendering works and is usable in most 
situations, except for the odd corner case when drawing over existing 
content in transparent surfaces.


See eg. this screenshot of netbeans, with nice subpixel rendered text 
in the editor, while the labels on the buttons at the bottom have 
artifacts since they for some reason are drawn twice.


Inline images 1

On 2 August 2016 at 00:49, Kevin Rushforth > wrote:


Phil will be able to comment on this further. All I can confirm is
that 8078526 is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, so it is no
longer an open bug.

-- Kevin


Torgeir Veimo wrote:

I'm fairly sure it's the correct bug id, although I don't have
access to view it myself.

Bug 8078526 is about supporting (without artifacts) subpixel
rendering to transparent surfaces.

Bug 8087201 is about speeding up subpixel rendering.

On 2 August 2016 at 00:39, Kevin Rushforth
>
wrote:

Are you sure you have the right Bug ID? That bug (which is
not publicly visible), is closed as a duplicate of 8087201,
which was fixed in JDK 9 and 8u66 over a year ago.

-- Kevin



Torgeir Veimo wrote:

Is there any more work done on JDK bug 8078516?
-- 
-Tor




-- 
-Tor





--
-Tor

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Fwd: JDK bug 8078516

[Torgeir Veimo]

Ok, am asking since subpixel rendering works and is usable in most
situations, except for the odd corner case when drawing over existing
content in transparent surfaces.

See eg. this screenshot of netbeans, with nice subpixel rendered text in
the editor, while the labels on the buttons at the bottom have artifacts
since they for some reason are drawn twice.

 [image: Inline images 1]

On 2 August 2016 at 00:49, Kevin Rushforth 
wrote:

> Phil will be able to comment on this further. All I can confirm is that
> 8078526 is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, so it is no longer an open bug.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>
> I'm fairly sure it's the correct bug id, although I don't have access to
> view it myself.
>
> Bug 8078526 is about supporting (without artifacts) subpixel rendering to
> transparent surfaces.
>
> Bug 8087201 is about speeding up subpixel rendering.
>
> On 2 August 2016 at 00:39, Kevin Rushforth 
> wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you have the right Bug ID? That bug (which is not publicly
>> visible), is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, which was fixed in JDK 9 and
>> 8u66 over a year ago.
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>> Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any more work done on JDK bug 8078516?
>>> --
>>> -Tor
>>
>>
>
> --
> -Tor
>
>


-- 
-Tor

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Fwd: JDK bug 8078516

[Kevin Rushforth]

Phil will be able to comment on this further. All I can confirm is that 
8078526 is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, so it is no longer an open bug.


-- Kevin


Torgeir Veimo wrote:
I'm fairly sure it's the correct bug id, although I don't have access 
to view it myself. 

Bug 8078526 is about supporting (without artifacts) subpixel rendering 
to transparent surfaces. 


Bug 8087201 is about speeding up subpixel rendering.

On 2 August 2016 at 00:39, Kevin Rushforth > wrote:


Are you sure you have the right Bug ID? That bug (which is not
publicly visible), is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, which was
fixed in JDK 9 and 8u66 over a year ago.

-- Kevin



Torgeir Veimo wrote:

Is there any more work done on JDK bug 8078516?
-- 
-Tor




--
-Tor

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Fwd: JDK bug 8078516

[Torgeir Veimo]

I'm fairly sure it's the correct bug id, although I don't have access to
view it myself.

Bug 8078526 is about supporting (without artifacts) subpixel rendering to
transparent surfaces.

Bug 8087201 is about speeding up subpixel rendering.

On 2 August 2016 at 00:39, Kevin Rushforth 
wrote:

> Are you sure you have the right Bug ID? That bug (which is not publicly
> visible), is closed as a duplicate of 8087201, which was fixed in JDK 9 and
> 8u66 over a year ago.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>
>> Is there any more work done on JDK bug 8078516?
>> --
>> -Tor
>
>

-- 
-Tor