Re: (313) Waveless DJing

2003-06-15 Thread Rev. Jeffrey Paul
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, jayson b wrote:
 if i just paid ten bucks you see you i best be getting someone juggling fish
 or breaking bricks with their heads.

 personally, i don't 'go there' for the music.  if i wanted to listen to the
 music *I* wanted to listen to, i'd do it in my basement.  i come to see
 someone do something i can't, or haven't thought of.

 *you* are a performer.  that's the 'P' on your 'pa.'  playing live is a
 performance art.  do something.  if you do anything else feel free to sit at
 home and do that, and be a producer.

Technically, even someone who just carries in their DAT and hits play and
stands there staring out at the crowd is 'performing'.

I'm not going to take sides in the it's all about the music debate, but
don't say that someone who stands motionless and stares unblinkingly at a
laptop for an hour is any less of a performer than the most visible and
energetic of trick djs.  They're certainly not as -good- of a performer,
but they are covered equally by the definition of the word.

I think that this would be a non-issue if people who do, for example,
laptop PAs, projected their video output on a screen behind them so you
can see what they're doing.

It's a lot more difficult giving the crowd something to look at if you're
not doing something on a flat horizontal surface.  Most performers who
don't play records forget this all too often.

Now for my personal opinion:  Do you have 10kW of sound in your basement?
How about a few hundred people?  Yeah, I didn't think so.  Give me 'Play'
on the DAT out in a condusive environment any day over armchair listening.

-j

--

 Rev. Jeffrey Paul-datavibe- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   aim:x736e65616b   pgp:0x15FA257E   phone:8777483467
70E0 B896 D5F3 8BF4 4BEE 2CCF EF2F BA28 15FA 257E



Re: (313) Waveless DJing

2003-06-15 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: Rev. Jeffrey Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I think that this would be a non-issue if people who do, for example,
laptop PAs, projected their video output on a screen behind them
so you
can see what they're doing.

ive thought of this, but the main drawback that i can think of is
that most people wouldnt have any idea what was actually
happening. though i guess there are some people who dont
understand what the deejay is doing. hmm. 

Now for my personal opinion:  Do you have 10kW of sound in your
basement?
How about a few hundred people?  Yeah, I didn't think so.  Give
me 'Play'
on the DAT out in a condusive environment any day over armchair
listening.

thats what im saying. i choose what events im going to attend
based on the venue and the clientele as well as the performer. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


(313) Wanted: Jeff Mills liquid room Tokyo copy

2003-06-15 Thread Joachim Castellano
Anyone out there have a copy of this hard to find CD?  If so, could you 
burn me a copy and send it to me?  I'm willing to send you a copy of 
any of my CD's that you don't have... or if you're into anything 
Japanese (Manga, Hello Kitty stuff) I could send you that too.  I'm not 
taking requests for school girl underwear, however.


Cast in Osaka



RE: (313) Richie Hawtin k

2003-06-15 Thread Wibo Lammerts
Yep, Maurice.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Hellige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: vrijdag 13 juni 2003 20:13
To: 313
Subject: Re: (313) Richie Hawtin k

[Matthew Mangold [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 KMS stands for, Kevin Master (Reese) Saunderson

Not Maurice?

Matt


-- 
Matt Hellige  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://matt.immute.net


Re: (313) Waveless DJing

2003-06-15 Thread J. T.

really i dont go out to hear music too often because for me it is
all about music. i dont need to be entertained, i can entertain
myself. i go out to hear music that is being manipulated by
someone in particular, i dont care how they manipulate it.


hey same here, and i'm with lester too. i'm not trying to make some mission 
statement about how i refuse to be entertained by a laptop performance. i 
just dont like to see things getting homogenized.



what LIVE means to me. live doesnt mean moving around a whole
bunch. it means live sound manipulation be it a laptop, a
keyboard, or deejaying.


true, as i specifically said, i wasnt trying to argue a laptop performance 
isnt live. i just think it's a bleak future for electronic music 
performance.


lemme make a stupid art analogy. there is artwork that is direct, it is what 
it is -- colors, form, pretty picture, boom ok there it is. then there is 
more conceptual art where you have to understand the process that went into 
making the piece, the idea behind it, to really appreciate what is going on 
with it. i dont want techno performance to become so slanted towards the 
conceptual that the more direct performance is a rarity -- which i think it 
is already becoming...i live in a place where this sh;t is finally starting 
to catch on a little bit, but these conceptual things don't draw new fans 
because they dont understand...going back to what tristan was saying about 
audiences, it would be just fine if they did, if the right audience was 
here, but it's not. and this is true all over the place.


i understand the conceptual side, and i'm sure most people on this list 
do...but what about those who aren't all techno geeky etc like us? this is 
what i meant by elitist.



i can (and often times do) just like to sit there and feel the
music and the vibe in the room with my eyes closed.


yeah so do i. i still maintain there can and maybe should be more than just 
an aural aspect to live electronic music performance. i dont think this is 
any sort of crazy idea. yes i appreciate music by itself. i was hoping that 
was a given...i dont have a bias against how an ableton mix may sound, but 
how it is performed, yes...i can still enjoy it, i am just concerned with 
the trend, more and more laptops, final scratch, ableton, n...i'm not 
trying to draw a line in the sand, my feelings arent all one way or another, 
just talking y'know..


jt

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963




RE: (313) Waveless DJing

2003-06-15 Thread Brendan Nelson
| -Original Message-
| From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 11:57 AM
|
| i'm not trying to draw a line in the sand, my feelings
| arent all one way or another, just talking y'know..

Exactly - I'm coming from the same position myself.

While I'm prepared to come out and advocate these newer technologies, on the
other hand I hold the notion of performance in pretty high esteem.

The bad thing with newer tools when it comes to performance, IMHO, is that a
lot of the things that are being done by the performer are happening on a
screen that only the performer can see. When DJs like Jeff Mills, Claude
Young, Short Kut or Dummy are performing, though, the nature of the
technology they're using is that the audience can see everything they're
doing. Every touch of the record, every move on the faders, it's all there
before our eyes.

Because I come from a background of traditional DJing, if I were to ever
play a live set using Ableton, I would think hard before doing it about what
I could possibly do to make it look even minutely as interesting as a
decks'n'mixer DJ set... because it's true that someone bent over a laptop
and clicking a mouse isn't much of a spectacle.

On the other hand, I was at Basic Channel's PA at Lost back in the
mid-1990s, where they performed the whole set while hidden behind a white
sheet, and I don't think I've enjoyed any live PA more than I did that one.
In terms of performance aesthetics, the person who most does it for me right
now is Matt Herbert (his set as Radioboy at Ether last year was really fun
to watch - he managed to give the impression that the music was controlling
*him*, rather than the other way around...)


Brendan
www.lunarselector.com



(313) Sonar on Radio 1

2003-06-15 Thread ian cheshire
For those of us who are/were unlucky not to go,
fear not as Radio 1 will be showcasing some highlights
over 2 shows and it will be presented by John Peel.

Tues 17th 10pm-12
Thurs 19th 10pm-12

:0)





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 10/06/03



Re: (313) Wanted: Jeff Mills liquid room Tokyo copy

2003-06-15 Thread jake

if u have broadband internet i can hook u up


On Sunday, June 15, 2003, at 12:48  AM, Joachim Castellano wrote:

Anyone out there have a copy of this hard to find CD?  If so, could 
you burn me a copy and send it to me?  I'm willing to send you a copy 
of any of my CD's that you don't have... or if you're into anything 
Japanese (Manga, Hello Kitty stuff) I could send you that too.  I'm 
not taking requests for school girl underwear, however.


Cast in Osaka







Re[2]: (313) Wanted: Jeff Mills liquid room Tokyo copy

2003-06-15 Thread Brian 'balistic' Prince

j if u have broadband internet i can hook u up

It's in morally questionable situations like these that one must ask
himself:

W.W.D.J.A.D?

http://www.bprince.com/WWDJAD.jpg

(yes, I've been waiting for an excuse to use it)

-
will draw for records
-
Brian balistic Prince
http://www.bprince.com - art and techno