Re: (313) Philly joints?
Armands was great. its 5 years since ive been there though. Anthony On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Patrick Wacher pwac...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Any record store tips for Philly? Will also take recommendations of other fun things to check out ;) Thanks! Patrick.
Re: (313) Mills' Last Weekend Tracklist Update]
Original Message Subject: Re: (313) Mills' Last Weekend Tracklist Update From:Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, November 30, 2006 2:41 am To: 313@hyperreal.org -- He also has a compilation l.p. out on Azuli with his all time classic favorites on it. Has Denroy Morgan, geraldine hunt, jackie noore etc etc. really good. Might help. Anthony On 11/29/06, Wojtek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Wiz also played Shades of Jae in LA, along with The Man With the red Face those are two of my all time favorite tracks. man, i would have loved to have been there for these sets. Now, if someone could only ID the track he played that has early '80's-sounding, almost disco-like female vocals (not the Wee papa Girls one) and a slowed down, Chaka Khan like melody/bassline... have you checked his inspirations mix thats floating about on the net? it could be something that he played on there, its mostly disco stuff... tom
Re: (313) Louis Haiman /Chris Schubert/ Bill VanLoo
Couldn't agree more. Best thing to happen to electronic music in years. Louis Haiman Is a Man among boys on the techno tip. And Chris Schubert is just 23 years old, imagine what kinda music he'll be making 5 - 10 years from now. All release's well above par on the Fwdthought label. MUCH respect. Anthony On Mon, November 13, 2006 2:34 pm, theREALmxyzptlk wrote: Has the new Haiman been mentioned on the list yet? It really, really should be. Louis has outdone himself. Deep, lush Detroity-techno. I know Chris Schubert's debut was discussed briefly (redefines 'pop-ambient' with -imho- great success) and I wholeheartedly agree with the positive assessments. Fwdthought is really dishing up some lovely music. Big 'hats-off' to Mr. Haiman. And while I'm at it, Bill VanLoo's Chromedecay pt.2 is a really fine piece of work as well. It's not straight 313, but has 2 really fine, deep, pure-this-listy tracks on it which will make you salivate - along with the rest of his work, which moves through other genres, but is definitely a worthy acquisition. jeff
(313) RE:(313) What time is it?! (oh yeah, 9:30 PM)]
Original Message Subject: (313) What time is it?! (oh yeah, 9:30 PM) From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, October 5, 2006 7:19 pm To: 313@hyperreal.org -- Excellent music. Top shelf. Emotive Such depth Very couragous. Anthony www.spacial-abstraction.com/demo/cschubert-930pm.mp3 also: new album out on Louis Haiman(Transmat Time:Space comps) 's fwdthought label Pupil is The Black Hole in Brilliant Space www.cdbaby.com/chrisschubert you can also check it @ iTunes or Amazon.com Love, Ronald Chi -- Me: www.myspace.com/spacialabstraction Music: www.myspace.com/spacialabstraction2
(313) RE:(313) records]
Original Message Subject: (313) records From:Derek Plaslaiko. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Fri, September 22, 2006 8:41 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org kent williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Do you even play records? don't bother letting me know about the best timecode joints this summer.thanks Anthony My records are at home, but I would be more than glad to put together a top 50 of the summer for you guys. I will also state that Kent, or ANYONE else, if you want to know what Im playing, ask me when i'm playing it. I have NO idea what I played that night! I probably would not even been able to answer that question 5 mins after I played! I DO know I played 3 tracks off that Samuel Sessions on Klap Klap. The new Klap Klap is really great too! Also, Petter's Some Polyphony on Border Community. Probably a Rekorder record or 2. *shrugg* derek. On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who cares - it's been slow today and there isn't much 313 discussion going on anyway - Kent is the super here so if he asked you better start talking ;-) MEK Derek Plaslaiko. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/22/2006 01:54:16 PM: I would talk about them, but many wouldnt be considered 313 material... or at least not by most of the members of this list. ...and no, i do not mean that as a diss, so please save the hate mail. derek. On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, kent williams wrote: Sure. You should talk about all those killer records I'd never heard before that you played at SubTonic when I was there. Damn Record Distributor yobbos who keep all the good stuff for themselves ;-) On 9/22/06, Derek Plaslaiko. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can we all PLEASE STOP! TALKING! ABOUT! RICHIE! HAWTIN! PLEASE!? Anthony J. Susan
Re: (313) What's the one track that will make you hit the dancefloor???]
Original Message Subject: Re: (313) What's the one track that will make you hit the dancefloor??? From:kent williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Wed, September 6, 2006 3:45 am To: list 313 313@hyperreal.org -- Titonton Duvante's CHRONOLOGIC OR: Metro Area's DANCE REACTION speaking Techno/House of course The list could go on cause I love to dance anyway. Now someone should do a mix of all these tracks named on this heads. I'm afraid it would make people's heads explode! On 9/5/06, Ben Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hell yeah!!! A blinder in my book On 6/9/06 3:46 am, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pépé Bradock's Deep Burnt
Re: (313) really]
Original Message Subject: Re: (313) really From:Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, August 31, 2006 6:51 pm To: 313@hyperreal.org -- Relax guys. Just do your own thing and you should be happy. Who gives a hoot what some idiot is doing on their laptop. It's bogus to even consider the biters in the equation. The more the market is flooded with non sense the more your music should stand out. Its a good thing. Mr. Twon On 8/31/06, Dale Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For every hack artist that installs some software and declares themselves a musician there are hundreds of individuals in the past who picked up a guitar and thought they were rock stars. it could be that it was like that in the past. but i bet the number right now of people who own a computer without making music is far more than the number of people who own a guitar that sits around for no reason. so for those people, it takes almost no effort to DL and install any variety of music software, whereas if you wanna play guitar youve gotta go out and buy a guitar, learn how to play it (no matter how basic your music is going to be), and find people to play in a band with, and then on top of that either buy or borrow equipment to actually record and mixdown said music. with a laptop, you can do everything and have it posted on the web in under 2 hours. you dont even have to have any idea how to physically play any instrument, you can just point and click with your mouse, a technique many people already have mastered! we're only at the start of the use of computers to make music, really. and if the quality keeps going down the way it has been, one day people will be yearning for the early 00's. Dylan knows how to play guitar, etc... Kraftwerk knows how to work their synthesizers (and they use a computer as their sequencer--if not having moved completely over to software synthesis in their own studio already)... hell, *I* know how to work synthesizers too... Producing sound in real-time within the computer is just another tool. Either you're good at it or you aren't. Some get the A grade... others get the F... and a whole lot of in between. the problem with the tool of course is that it requires nothing in addition to work. no techiques, no abilities, nothing. hell, you can even get sample packs on the web of every drum machine ever and use them all. nothing at all is required to get going. which i appreciate in theory. in practice however, it makes people really lazy and more than willing to just copy and bite things left and right. if you want to start a band or even just use a hardware electronic music studio, its going to require 10 times more thought and effort just to get going than it is to make a remedial track in most software apps. that efforts weeds out jokers. not all of them, unfortunately, but alot of them. Personally, if we're talking about tools, I only use Live and one plug-in, which is simply a synthesizer that I like. I've rarely even read a manual for a piece of gear. I've figured out all of the synthesis parameters out there myself, and have usually stayed out of gear discussions because I already had the tools/gear I wanted and really didn't care about anything else. I was never a gear head, I am a music head. There are so many people out there that are exactly the same way... many that have strolled in and out of this list over the years. for all these music heads, where is the good music? are they just not working hard enough? too many people bite the trendy style, too many people follow the paint by numbers method of making music in genre X. and that isnt limited to computer users, but it seems extremely prevalent amongst them. Yes, every morning I wake up, turn on my computer, double-click the Live 5.0 icon on my desktop, and press return. The songs just come pouring out. Check my page. It's astounding. I hope nobody else figures out what program I use. I'll be ruined. hey man, YOU might not. but many other people do just use their programs in the same old way and make the same old crap. im not gonna say what i feel about your tracks because this isnt what the discussion is about. but i bet you can guess. Did you receive my point about all the new technologies in music... or even art in general, such as photography, always receiving resistance in their infancy? its not really a new point, Extraneous insult ignored. which extraneous insult was that? You may understand it, but I'm not sure if the point is sinking in. Is photography art? If so, why? All you have to do is press a button. Some people make masterpieces with their Polaroids while others make trash with their elaborate camera systemsand vice versa. but the point is that if you try to substitute the elaborate setup for talent, it doesnt
Re: (313) t-mobile]
Original Message Subject: Re: (313) t-mobile From:Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Sat, August 26, 2006 5:39 pm To: 313@hyperreal.org -- On 8/26/06, Nick Breinich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can vouch for that. Suckers beware! Tom Cox will let you know why and how you suck! that's some next level lame dude. highschool level (at best) taunting followed by the chilling threat of authority. classic combo. but i guess that's all there was. threat of authority? i was just suggesting to him that i wasnt going to reply to emails that mention threatening the president. all i know is that in my life, people have never said things to my face like people will say over the internet. and everything i say over the internet i would say and have said to people to their face. tom
(313) hello guys
img src=http://www.spacial-abstraction.com/img/flyer.jpg;/img Hi, I'm new to this mailing list so i hope im doing this correctly. This is a party I'm throwing here in Pittsburgh Pa down the road as of Labor Day weekend.
