(313) IDM (was Re: Cubik)

2002-12-16 Thread Remco . Doorewaard

Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:

 here's the problem: IDM has gone from being more traditionally
 techno/ambient based in the early 90's to being a reaction against
 just about anything they feel like going against, mostly melody
 and rhythm as far as i can tell. it seems (to me at least) that
 its just on this course of making music as
 mathematically complex as possible while becoming increasingly
 unlistenable.

I would like to disagree! You label IDM (here we go again with this
horrible name) as one type of sound, while it is so divers! Of course,
there is the mathematical sounding music by the likes of Autechre,
Richard Divine, Funkstorung, but there is so much more! Listen to things on
City Centre Offices, Bola, Plaid, Christ, L'Usine, things on Toytronic, all
beautiful music with plenty of melody and rather 'normal' beats.

Why does music always have to be labeled? If you heve heard all the music
containing this genre, than you can make a statement, otherwise please
don't!

Remco Doorewaard




RE: (313) IDM (was Re: Cubik)

2002-12-16 Thread Remco . Doorewaard




| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:03 AM
|
| Why does music always have to be labeled? If you heve heard all the music
| containing this genre, than you can make a statement, otherwise please
| don't!

I think that if people had to have heard *all* the music in a particular
style to be able to discuss it at all, this list would be pretty damn quiet
:)

Ok, fair enough :¬), but this is a very narrow view on IDM imo!

Remco