[389-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : 389-ds-base #1086

2016-09-29 Thread jenkins
See 
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Please review, nunc-stans 63 and 64

2016-09-29 Thread William Brown
https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/ticket/63

https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/63/0001-Ticket-63-segfault-in-thr_stack_create.patch

https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/ticket/64

https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/64/0001-Ticket-64-Remove-ns_job_modify.patch


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Re: Please review design proposal for tickets 47986 and 48976

2016-09-29 Thread Noriko Hosoi

Hi Ludwig,

On 09/29/2016 05:43 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:

This is the initial proposal, thanks for your feedback

http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/delay-accepting-updates-after-init.html 




Please help me understanding the design...

I'm having a bit hard time to figure out the relationship/dependency 
among these 3 config parameters.


nsslapd-replica-accept-updates-state: on/off
nsslapd-replica-accept-updates-delay: -1/0/n
nsslapd-replica-accept-updates-auto: on/off

Are they independent or dependent?  Do they take any combinations -- 2 * 
3 * 2 == 12.  There are 12 different behaviors?  (assuming n for -delay 
is one case :)


What is your recommendation to the customers?  I mean, what is the 
default setting?  For instance, if -auto is "on", when an online init is 
executed on the master, the scenario is automatically kicked in?


Thanks,
--noriko





||

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Please review design proposal for tickets 47986 and 48976

2016-09-29 Thread Ludwig Krispenz

This is the initial proposal, thanks for your feedback

http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/delay-accepting-updates-after-init.html

--
Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric 
Shander
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org