[389-devel] Please review: 26 and 49231

2017-04-25 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/26

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/8f7363b1d8e2180014864f73225e24d78c2eaf06df40f7360e4a461f749f256c-0001-Ticket-26-improve-lib389-sasl-support.patch

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49231

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/3881608d02496362a40c67b392f004c94be144f0426dd03002e2454994cf53c7-0001-Ticket-49231-fix-sasl-mech-handling.patch


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Please review: 49233 correct psearch regression

2017-04-25 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49233

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/7714e5de5c1d872bb387f286da406c9cd648e6982ecaea8a741f37c7a8ff21ce-0001-Ticket-49233-Fix-crash-in-persistent-search.patch


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Re: lib389 replica class

2017-04-25 Thread William Brown
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:17 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> 
> On 04/25/2017 01:05 AM, William Brown wrote:
> > Hi Mark / others
> >
> > Given that one of our community members (ankity) is hitting up against
> > some issues, and the function they need is in the ReplicaLegacy object,
> > maybe it's time we bit the bullet and broke the old ReplicaObject in
> > favour of the new one? It would be worth us sinking some time down into
> > this improvement, as it's going to help ease people into lib389 in the
> > future. 
> I would like to get rid of all the legacy classes.  What does this
> impact, just the existing CI tests?

Yes, it would probably affect many of these tests, but most of the
damage would be the topology module. Thankfully, it's only one place to
fix, then it's just cleanup. 

> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] please review: Issue 49236 - Fix latest CI failures

2017-04-25 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49236

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/c1fad34b64da3f64f493a6846cd0b47ae6f20f2510e074c5343aef467fac9d09-0001-Issue-49236-Fix-CI-Tests.patch

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Please review 49230: slapi_register_plugin creates config entry where it should not

2017-04-25 Thread thierry bordaz

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49230

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/daf059ca6b5791e50a37866387bccf0c21ae9a563f5326db08d06d31ca75e854-0001-Ticket-49230-slapi_register_plugin-creates-config-en.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] Re: lib389 replica class

2017-04-25 Thread Mark Reynolds


On 04/25/2017 01:05 AM, William Brown wrote:
> Hi Mark / others  
>
> Given that one of our community members (ankity) is hitting up against
> some issues, and the function they need is in the ReplicaLegacy object,
> maybe it's time we bit the bullet and broke the old ReplicaObject in
> favour of the new one? It would be worth us sinking some time down into
> this improvement, as it's going to help ease people into lib389 in the
> future. 
I would like to get rid of all the legacy classes.  What does this
impact, just the existing CI tests?
>
>
>
> ___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org