[389-devel] switch to F19 for autogen?
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with switching to using F19 to run autogen? -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] switch to F19 for autogen?
On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with switching to using F19 to run autogen? Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] switch to F19 for autogen?
(2013年10月09日 15:24), Rich Megginson wrote: On 10/09/2013 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with switching to using F19 to run autogen? Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum. Any objections? Speak now or be required to use F19 for autotool changes . . . noriko No objections. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
