Re: [389-users] stable packages for Centos 7

2014-10-20 Thread Angel Bosch
can someone give me some light on this issue?

I'm getting some presure from my direct bosses and I need all info I can get to 
evaluate our DS environment for next year.

thanks in advance.

abosch



- Missatge original -
 De: Angel Bosch abo...@ticmallorca.net
 Per: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Enviats: Dimarts, 23 de Setembre 2014 13:05:33
 Assumpte: stable packages for Centos 7
 
 hi,
 
 I'm planing to migrate some of my servers to 1.3 branch and I don't
 know what packages to use.
 
 I've found packages from mreynolds:
 http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mreynolds/389-ds-base/
 
 and dfas: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dfas/389-ds-dfas/
 
 
 first one seems to be a nightly and I would like to mantain an stable
 install. should I use dfas?
 
 by the way, is the policy-packages situation going to be solved
 anytime? I found very confusing having to deal with several repos to
 get a full installation of 389 DS, and I though this spliting thing
 was temporary just for EL6.
 
 thanks for your time,
 
 abosch
 
 --
 
 
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] stable packages for Centos 7

2014-10-20 Thread Rich Megginson

On 10/20/2014 04:48 AM, Angel Bosch wrote:

can someone give me some light on this issue?

I'm getting some presure from my direct bosses and I need all info I can get to 
evaluate our DS environment for next year.


There should be some pre-built and supported 389 packages available for 
EL7 around the RHEL 7.1 timeframe.




thanks in advance.

abosch



- Missatge original -

De: Angel Bosch abo...@ticmallorca.net
Per: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Enviats: Dimarts, 23 de Setembre 2014 13:05:33
Assumpte: stable packages for Centos 7

hi,

I'm planing to migrate some of my servers to 1.3 branch and I don't
know what packages to use.

I've found packages from mreynolds:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mreynolds/389-ds-base/

and dfas: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dfas/389-ds-dfas/


first one seems to be a nightly and I would like to mantain an stable
install. should I use dfas?

by the way, is the policy-packages situation going to be solved
anytime? I found very confusing having to deal with several repos to
get a full installation of 389 DS, and I though this spliting thing
was temporary just for EL6.

thanks for your time,

abosch

--



--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

[389-users] Fwd: SASL configuration

2014-10-20 Thread Dhiraj Deshpande
Hello Guys,

Can i get some help in this. I need to configure SASL to use DIGEST-MD5 for
my autofs configuration. I am not getting through.

Thanks
Dhiraj Deshpande

-- Forwarded message --
From: Dhiraj Deshpande dhiraj26...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:01 AM
Subject: SASL configuration
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org



Hi folks,

Need to configure sasl mecanism so that i can use DIGEST-MD5 mechanism with
my autofs configuration. With PLAIN it is working fine but need to use
DIGEST-MD5. Where i can specify.



[root@ibm001 ~]# cat /etc/autofs_ldap_auth.conf
?xml version=1.0 ?
!--
This files contains a single entry with multiple attributes tied to it.
See autofs_ldap_auth.conf(5) for more information.
--

autofs_ldap_sasl_conf
usetls=no
tlsrequired=no
 authrequired=yes
authtype=DIGEST-MD5
user=proxyuser
secret=XXX
/



-- 


Thanks  Regards
Dhiraj S. Deshpande



-- 


Thanks  Regards
Dhiraj S. Deshpande
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users