Re: [389-users] ad nested objects sync

2011-09-16 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/16/2011 08:55 AM, Vasil Mikhalenya wrote:
 hi all,

 can windows sync agreement replicate nested objects ? like
 cn=user1,ou=location1,ou=Root,dc=domain ?
 when i specify ou=Root,dc=domain in sync agreement - it replicates
 only objects under ou=Root,dc=domain itself like
 cn=user_in_root,ou=Root,dc=domain but neither
 cn=user1,ou=location1,ou=Root,dc=domain nor
 ou=location1,ou=Root,dc=domain

 Is it possible at all?
No.
 thnx

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


Re: [389-users] ad nested objects sync

2011-09-16 Thread solarflow99
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.comwrote:

 On 09/16/2011 08:55 AM, Vasil Mikhalenya wrote:
  hi all,
 
  can windows sync agreement replicate nested objects ? like
  cn=user1,ou=location1,ou=Root,dc=domain ?
  when i specify ou=Root,dc=domain in sync agreement - it replicates
  only objects under ou=Root,dc=domain itself like
  cn=user_in_root,ou=Root,dc=domain but neither
  cn=user1,ou=location1,ou=Root,dc=domain nor
  ou=location1,ou=Root,dc=domain
 
  Is it possible at all?
 No.



Try manually creating the OU subcontainers in 389.  I can't remember exactly
how I did it, but I remember doing what you're trying to do.  I think I had
to put the users and groups OU under a common OU per replication agreement
however.

Hope this helps..
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users