Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64
On Dec 9, 9:45 am, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, > and hopefully other Linuxes as well. > It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly. > I haven't built new binaries nor a new distribution. > Soon; perhaps tomorrow. > > Russ Pulled latest sources from mercurial, not working for me. I can see a window openning and immediately see it crashing I am using the latest 9vx on old distribution, just replaced the exe. Compiles fine on a Sabayon 3.5.1 x86_64 9vx panic: boot process died: sys: trap: page fault pc=0x1020 aborting, to dump core.
Re: [9fans] old news?
In article <21f4cf04-81c2-4270-a947-d244600a3...@mac.com>, pietro10 @mac.com says... > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > http://lame.sourceforge.net/download.php > > "LAME compiles on ... Plan 9, ..." think about it... lame will compile on a cell phone. lame will compile on a glorified memory stick it's probably been compiled on the embedded OS of an external HDD if it had USB, lame would probably compile on a toaster -hey, that's a thought: iToast, with downloadable shades and a pat of butter you can't replace. ...or would berkeley get upset? (sorry to just go off unannounced like that; I've followed plan9 for a couple of years now and run it on one of my boxes because I like glenda; but I normally hang out in ALT.*, and you know we have no manners there. I see a setup like "LAME compiles on..." and I'm supposed to leave it alone?)
Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64
On Dec 11, 7:08 pm, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:04 AM, simplicity wrote: > > On Dec 9, 6:45 pm, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > >> 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, > >> and hopefully other Linuxes as well. > >> It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly. > >> I haven't built new binaries nor a new distribution. > >> Soon; perhaps tomorrow. > > >> Russ > > > please give it to me :) > > you can get it yourself as long as you want to > compile it:http://hg.pdos.csail.mit.edu/hg/vx32 > > russ Aborted, here is alog with -P -S -X reate new cpu: kprocq.n=1 nrunproc=0 cpu0: ready 2 *x11*; wakeup kproc cpus cpu1: runproc 2 *x11* [0 0] create new cpu: kprocq.n=1 nrunproc=0 cpu0: ready 3 *timer*; wakeup kproc cpus cpu2: runproc 3 *timer* [0 0] namec #/ namec #e/terminal namec #e/cputype namec #e/rootdir namec #e/service namec #e/user namec #e/sysname namec #Zplan9/ create new cpu: kprocq.n=1 nrunproc=0 cpu0: ready 4 *io*; wakeup kproc cpus cpu3: runproc 4 *io* [0 0] create new cpu: kprocq.n=1 nrunproc=0 cpu0: ready 4 *io*; wakeup kproc cpus cpu3: runproc 4 *io* [0 1] cpu4: runproc psleep 0 1 namec / namec #p cpu3: runproc psleep 0 2 namec /proc namec #~/mntloop namec #Zplan9/ cpu0: ready 4 *io*; wakeup kproc cpus cpu3: runproc awake cpu3: runproc 4 *io* [0 1] cpu0: idlehands cpu3: runproc psleep 0 2 cpu0: busy hands cpu0: idlehands returning namec #s/boot +vx32 712ee0 7ff269bf3010 *init* eip20 espÿfff84 vx32_sighandler signo eip=0x47674d esp=0x69470c98 vs=0x1f rax rbx rcx 004783e2 rdx 002b rsi 7ff269470c58 rdi 50c6c000 rbp 7ff269470f08 rsp 7ff269470c98 r8 7ff269470dc8 r9 r10 r11 0202 r12 00833010 r13 0f84 r14 1020 r15 50c6c000 rip 0047674d efl 00010246 cs 0033 ss err trapno 000d cr2 vxemu_sighandler 50c6c000 -0x1 VX trap e err 0 va veip 1020 veflags -vx32 712ee0 7ff269bf3010 *init* eip20 espÿfff84 rc=0xe notify cpu0: ready 4 *io*; wakeup kproc cpus cpu3: runproc awake cpu3: runproc 4 *io* [0 1] 9vx panic: boot process died: sys: trap: page fault pc=0x1020 cpu3: runproc psleep 0 2 aborting, to dump core. Aborted
[9fans] acer aspire one
Anyone had any experience with a "acer aspire one". Atom proc, SSD. lotsa goodies. US$240. One got delivered to the hill today. Tiger quite likes it. It has some batshit version of linux on it. If anyone has had fun with such a beast let me know. Looks like a good traveller. brucee
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
Yes Bruce, I've had a little fun with it. Its destination was family members (kids) in India, in rather difficult conditions. It did not survive there (from what's gotten back to me, it seems to be just a software issue -- something to do with the GUI being broken, and thus unusable for the kids). But I'll be getting either that one back, or a new one, soon enough. Did you have some adventures in mind? Regards, akumar > Anyone had any experience with a "acer aspire one". Atom proc, SSD. > lotsa goodies. US$240. ... > brucee
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
just looks like a good thing to run the bunny on. i don't have time to look into it now. brucee On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:31 PM, wrote: > Yes Bruce, I've had a little fun with it. Its destination was > family members (kids) in India, in rather difficult conditions. > It did not survive there (from what's gotten back to me, it seems to > be just a software issue -- something to do with the GUI being broken, > and thus unusable for the kids). > > But I'll be getting either that one back, or a new one, soon enough. > Did you have some adventures in mind? > > Regards, > akumar > > >> Anyone had any experience with a "acer aspire one". Atom proc, SSD. >> lotsa goodies. US$240. > ... >> brucee > > >
Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64
> Aborted, here is alog with -P -S -X > > reate new cpu: kprocq.n1 nrunproc0 > cpu0: ready 2 *x11*; wakeup kproc cpus It seems a little odd that the log starts with a partial word. It is posible that if you did 9vx -PSX >log 2>&1 that somehow the fd offsets for 1 and 2 are not being maintained properly (I don't understand it, but I've seen it). Sometimes it works better to do 9vx -PSX 2>&1 | cat >log Russ
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
> just looks like a good thing to run the bunny on. i don't have time to > look into it now. > > brucee is the keyboard horrendous? nkl
Re: [9fans] web interface to sources seems to be down
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:16 +0500, Roman Zhukov wrote: > http://9fans.net/archive/2008/11/891 Aha! I now remember seeing that one. But since its been more than 2 weeks -- I guess the question is, whether web interface to sources has any chance of recovering. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
> is the keyboard horrendous? it is. both the aspire and the Asus Eee PC make my chubby fingers suffer. monitor is also tiny (especially on the Eee). i'm sticking with the macbook as the smallest still usable for programming laptop, especially since i can stick an sufficiently large SSD drive in it and not worry about banging it (much). Eee comes in a larger size now (10", i believe) but i ahve not tried that.
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
The 10" Eee is great. Mine has many flyer miles. brucee On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:36 AM, andrey mirtchovski wrote: >> is the keyboard horrendous? > > it is. both the aspire and the Asus Eee PC make my chubby fingers > suffer. monitor is also tiny (especially on the Eee). i'm sticking > with the macbook as the smallest still usable for programming laptop, > especially since i can stick an sufficiently large SSD drive in it and > not worry about banging it (much). > > Eee comes in a larger size now (10", i believe) but i ahve not tried that. > >
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
> The 10" Eee is great. Mine has many flyer miles. does it run plan9? -Steve
Re: [9fans] acer aspire one
no, but it's a killer drawterm machine. and small enough to take to the pub. brucee On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Steve Simon wrote: >> The 10" Eee is great. Mine has many flyer miles. > > does it run plan9? > > -Steve > >
