Re: [9fans] iwp9 deadline extension

2009-08-29 Thread Axel Belinfante

as in Antwerp, Belgium?
that would be cool!

Axel.

On Aug 28, 2009, at 21:42 , Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:

Satelite conference locations in Antwerp and Oz may be be a bad idea  
assuming folks can accomodate crazy time differences.


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 28, 2009, at 2:21 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net  
wrote:



On Fri Aug 28 15:09:25 EDT 2009, noah.ev...@gmail.com wrote:

We don't have any travel budget now does coraid have any sponsors
willing to fund travel?



that's a tough one.  my currency thus far has largely been
tom sawyering and cajolerie.  coraid and uga have helped
with facilities, but there is no money for travel.

the gsoc group had talked about using some of the google
money for such things.

in case this is not evident, it is okay to submit a paper
if you can't attend.

- erik






Re: [9fans] Getting printing to work over ethernet

2009-08-29 Thread Jonas Amoson

I have not progressed any further in getting lp(1)
to print to my networked printer. But by playing
around, I found a work-around that solves my problem
for the moment:

cat myfile.ps | telnet tcp!192.168.1.101!9100

/jonas




Re: [9fans] new 9atom.iso

2009-08-29 Thread David Leimbach
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:23 AM, David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:46 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.netwrote:

  Also, Eric, the 9atom.iso works on my older AMD machine for
 installation!
   THANKS! :-)

 hey!  back to the original story line.  that's great, and
 you're welcome.  i'd encourage anyone to report on
 your success or failure with 9atom offline.
 the goal is to get everything that should work working.

 - erik


 To further report the machine seems to be running after installation quite
 snappily though I seem to have messed something up and get a lot of
 messages about failed venti writes, due to a lack of a connection.


Now that I've had a chance to really examine the system, I'm noticing a
rather high interrupt count (1584), and I'm not exactly sure how to figure
out what's triggering them.

I did not install venti.  I just configured my ip address for DHCP, and I've
got aux/timesync running (I think that was suspect before for some reason).
 Stats shows interrupts as a solid rectangle of activity all the time.


Re: [9fans] new 9atom.iso

2009-08-29 Thread erik quanstrom
 Now that I've had a chance to really examine the system, I'm noticing a
 rather high interrupt count (1584), and I'm not exactly sure how to figure
 out what's triggering them.

i set HZ=1000.  so that accounts for 1000 of them.  i've also modified
/dev/irqalloc to count up the interrupts, so you should get a rough idea
of which irqs are responsible.  i say rough because chaned interrupts
can confuse the matter a bit.

 I did not install venti.  I just configured my ip address for DHCP, and I've
 got aux/timesync running (I think that was suspect before for some reason).
  Stats shows interrupts as a solid rectangle of activity all the time.

i get that too from stats.  it's just tuned to HZ=100.  the reason for the
increase is so that millisecond sleeps can work a bit better.  on all the
systems i use, the overhead is not worth worring about.

- erik



Re: [9fans] new 9atom.iso

2009-08-29 Thread David Leimbach
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:25 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.netwrote:

  Now that I've had a chance to really examine the system, I'm noticing a
  rather high interrupt count (1584), and I'm not exactly sure how to
 figure
  out what's triggering them.

 i set HZ=1000.  so that accounts for 1000 of them.  i've also modified
 /dev/irqalloc to count up the interrupts, so you should get a rough idea
 of which irqs are responsible.  i say rough because chaned interrupts
 can confuse the matter a bit.

  I did not install venti.  I just configured my ip address for DHCP, and
 I've
  got aux/timesync running (I think that was suspect before for some
 reason).
   Stats shows interrupts as a solid rectangle of activity all the time.

 i get that too from stats.  it's just tuned to HZ=100.  the reason for the
 increase is so that millisecond sleeps can work a bit better.  on all the
 systems i use, the overhead is not worth worring about.


Ah, I see so these are just normal interrupts of a healthy beating heart of
a system.  :-)

I was a little concerned I had configured something incorrectly.

Thanks for the explanation.



 - erik




[9fans] /proc/$pid/fd not mp safe

2009-08-29 Thread erik quanstrom
i haven't dug into the code yet, but it appears that /proc/fd
isn't fd safe.  note fd 7:

minooka; cat /proc/xxx/fd
/
  0 r  M   71 (0001   0 00)  8192   37 /mnt/term/dev/cons
  1 w  c0 (000a   0 00) 0   189454 /dev/null
  2 w  c0 (000a   0 00) 0   189454 /dev/null
  3 r  /0 (   0 80) 0  776 /
  4 r  M   55 (0ade  27 80)  8192 1651 /mnt
  5 r  M   71 (   0 80) 65512 2939 /mnt/term
  6 r  M   71 (05c6  89 80)  8192 3683 /mnt/term/386
  7 r  M   71 (05d5 340 80)  81921626erm/386/include
  8 r  M   71 (07e7  5 80)  81920 /mnt/term/386/include/ape

- erik