Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

[Winston Kodogo]

To be honest, I didn’t understand the “Grey Gardens” reference until I used
this new “Google” thing that Erik recommends. Were I not scared of being
called silly by Skip, I would recommend merging this exciting new potential
fork of Plan9 into the forthcoming "Great British Code Off" fork of Plan9,
of which I am the sole proprietor. But I won’t do that. Instead, I will
just say "On your marks, get set, Code!".



On Oct 17, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Jeff Sickel  wrote:

Next thing we know someone will produce a Grey Gardens fork of Plan 9.

Now that I said it, it’s likely the GPL version is the Plan 9 Grey Gardens
tree.

-jas



On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:53 PM, Prof Brucee  wrote:

Sounds like a lot of bullshit to me. No fish slapping.

On 16/10/2015 2:50 PM, "Kurt H Maier"  wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> i'd recommend a google search
>
>
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant=1=2=UTF-8#q=web%20garden
>

I deeply apologize for failing to summarize to your satisfaction.  I
have bookmarked the url you provided and welcome any feedback I Can use
to improve my understanding in this matter.

khm

Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

[Jeff Sickel]

Next thing we know someone will produce a Grey Gardens fork of Plan 9.

Now that I said it, it’s likely the GPL version is the Plan 9 Grey Gardens tree.

-jas



> On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:53 PM, Prof Brucee  wrote:
> 
> Sounds like a lot of bullshit to me. No fish slapping.
> 
> On 16/10/2015 2:50 PM, "Kurt H Maier"  > wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > i'd recommend a google search
> >
> > https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant=1=2=UTF-8#q=web%20garden
> >  
> > 
> >
> 
> I deeply apologize for failing to summarize to your satisfaction.  I
> have bookmarked the url you provided and welcome any feedback I Can use
> to improve my understanding in this matter.
> 
> khm
> 

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

[Bakul Shah]

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:07:08 - Giles Hutton  wrote:
> 
> Initially my main complaint was simply the heavy use of the mouse; it felt
> jarring to have to move my hand off home row. However, I've now just
> chalked that up to inexperience with acme.
> Right now I actually can't think of anything I particularly miss about vim
> text editing, which I guess is why I've dropped the idea.

If you produced any code or design notes, I'd be interested in
looking at them & may be using them as well. Thanks.