Re: [9fans] plan9ports : open for discussion here?
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:54:16AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > something wrong with the functioning; allowed me to subscribe, but > doesn't allow me to post or even unsubscribe saying "i am not a member". > A lot of the plan9port community suffers emotional trauma when introduced to externally-induced thoughts. Allow them time to decide that approving your membership was their idea, and you'll be accepted into the herd. Like trying to pet a wild squirrel, the trick is to sit very still until they forget you weren't always there. khm
Re: [9fans] plan9ports : open for discussion here?
On 2019-01-23 10:29 PM, David du Colombier wrote: is plan9ports also open for discussion on this list? Yes, but there is also a plan9port mailing list: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/plan9port-dev something wrong with the functioning; allowed me to subscribe, but doesn't allow me to post or even unsubscribe saying "i am not a member". ~mayuresh
Re: [9fans] Rc port.
On 2019-01-24 03:09 AM, Federico Benavento wrote: Hola, I just uploaded a standalone unix (only tested on macOS/Linux) port with edit, history and completion support to GitHub. I have been using it as my primary shell for months on macOS and it’s seems to be working pretty well. not undermining your efforts, but isn't a port of "rc" a part of plan9ports? ~mayuresh
Re: [9fans] Rc port.
Yes, you can, I think I even set the title of the terminal window when I cd. I’m not at home now, i’ll post my rcrc once I get a chance. > On 23 Jan 2019, at 19:11, Calvin Morrison wrote: > > feature i would ove: something equiv to a PS1 line so i know what > folder i'm in. Can I do that with $prompt?
Re: [9fans] Rc port.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 09:00, Federico Benavento wrote: > > I’ve been able to survive quite well on a regular Mac terminal with it. > Thanks for trying it. > feature i would ove: something equiv to a PS1 line so i know what folder i'm in. Can I do that with $prompt? Calvin.
Re: [9fans] Rc port.
I’ve been able to survive quite well on a regular Mac terminal with it. Thanks for trying it. > On Jan 23, 2019, at 6:57 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 08:41, Federico Benavento wrote: >> >> Hola, >> >> I just uploaded a standalone unix (only tested on macOS/Linux) port with >> edit, history and completion support to GitHub. >> I have been using it as my primary shell for months on macOS and it’s seems >> to be working pretty well. > > rc is a great shell. It's interface just isn't optimal with a fake TTY > like we use on linux. I think the merits of the shell outweigh that. > I've been using rlwrapper for a while which gives me command history > and thats nice, but completion will be cool too! > > btw could'nt get it to compile without adding > > diff --git a/unix.c b/unix.c > index 5c89243..1f88f69 100644 > --- a/unix.c > +++ b/unix.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > —- Federico G. Benavento benave...@gmail.com
Re: [9fans] Rc port.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 08:41, Federico Benavento wrote: > > Hola, > > I just uploaded a standalone unix (only tested on macOS/Linux) port with > edit, history and completion support to GitHub. > I have been using it as my primary shell for months on macOS and it’s seems > to be working pretty well. rc is a great shell. It's interface just isn't optimal with a fake TTY like we use on linux. I think the merits of the shell outweigh that. I've been using rlwrapper for a while which gives me command history and thats nice, but completion will be cool too! btw could'nt get it to compile without adding diff --git a/unix.c b/unix.c index 5c89243..1f88f69 100644 --- a/unix.c +++ b/unix.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include
[9fans] Rc port.
Hola, I just uploaded a standalone unix (only tested on macOS/Linux) port with edit, history and completion support to GitHub. I have been using it as my primary shell for months on macOS and it’s seems to be working pretty well. https://github.com/benavento/rc Have fun. —- Federico G. Benavento benave...@gmail.com
Re: [9fans] plan9ports : open for discussion here?
On 2019-01-23 10:29 PM, David du Colombier wrote: is plan9ports also open for discussion on this list? Yes, but there is also a plan9port mailing list: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/plan9port-dev thanks for this, much appreciate the tip.
Re: [9fans] plan9ports : open for discussion here?
> is plan9ports also open for discussion on this list? Yes, but there is also a plan9port mailing list: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/plan9port-dev -- David du Colombier
Re: [9fans] plan9ports : open for discussion here?
only p9p for mac os. (just joking)
[9fans] plan9ports : open for discussion here?
is plan9ports also open for discussion on this list?
Re: [9fans] Plan 9 DNS server and dnsflagday
Thanks to all! вт, 22 янв. 2019 г. в 21:59, Steve Simon : > my understanding is that this is fine, as long as the other RR’s in the > message are processed correctly. > > -Steve > > > > On 22 Jan 2019, at 5:05 pm, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote: > > > > we do not support edns at all. the Topt rr type is just ignored. > > > > -- > > cinap > > > -- С наилучшими пожеланиями Жилкин Сергей With best regards Zhilkin Sergey
