Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-15 Thread simplicity
It seems not working on LFS64 (pure-64 linux.from scratch)
vx64?



bash-3.2$ make
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/abort.o libvxc/
abort.c
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/assert.o libvxc/
assert.c
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/atexit.o libvxc/
atexit.c
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/difftime.o libvxc/
difftime.c
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/errno.o libvxc/
errno.c
...
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/bsdstdio/vasprintf.o
libvxc/bsdstdio/vasprintf.c
gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I.  -fno-
stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.o
libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.c
libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.c: In function :
libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.c:320: error: incompatible types when
assigning to type  from type
libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.c: In function :
libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.c:1008: error: incompatible types when
assigning to type  from type
make: *** [libvxc/bsdstdio/vfprintf.o] Error 1



Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-11 Thread simplicity
On Dec 9, 6:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russ Cox) wrote:
> 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64,
> and hopefully other Linuxes as well.
> It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly.
> I haven't built new binaries nor a new distribution.
> Soon; perhaps tomorrow.
>
> Russ

please give it to me :)



[9fans] plan9 on opensparc ?

2008-11-10 Thread simplicity
Does anyone tried this?

http://www.opensparc.net/



[9fans] FYI, glendix new 13 syscalls

2008-08-27 Thread simplicity
Hi,

A quick status update: 13 system calls have been implemented - just
enough to get a basic set of utilities running. So far we have cat,
sed, grep, 8c and a few others to run. Notable executables that don?t
work are 8l, ls, awk and sam (either because they look for filesystems
that aren?t there, or depend on stat which isn?t implemented correctly
as of yet).

Grab sources via git from here.
http://sources.glendix.org/?p=gitroot/glendix/main.git;a=summary

All the files inside syscall/ are to be put inside the linux kernel
tree (replacing files with the same name). The files inside loader/
are just a normal kernel module. Both together will let you execute
native Plan 9 binaries in Linux.

Patches, comments and suggestions are most welcome!
http://glendix.org/

TIA