Re: [9fans] new sources
How about we convince the mailing list software to stop inserting Reply-To headers. please don't. it's a list, with reply to the list.
[9fans] new sources
I've got a replacement for sources set up. It's a new machine (an Intel Core 2) named haggis.cs.bell-labs.com and should look like a slightly-old copy of sources. Please try it out and see if it looks like sources from your perspective. You may want to change your authdom declaration for outside.plan9.bell-labs.com in /lib/ndb to auth=haggis.cs.bell-labs.com authdom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com while you try out haggis. If it checks out, I'll replace its copy of the sources fossil with a brand-new snapshot from a fresh dump of sources, so don't store anything precious on haggis during this check-out period. Please mail reports, good or bad, to me, not 9fans; there's no need to add to the volume of traffic on 9fans for this.
Re: [9fans] new sources
Please try it out and see if it looks like sources from your perspective. You may want to change your authdom declaration for outside.plan9.bell-labs.com in /lib/ndb to Geoff, I did a walk of /n/sources/contrib and /n/haggis/contrib, and the latter is missing quite a few files: 48257 48260 2624325 contrib 41701 41704 2260692 haggis 89958 89964 4885017 total Which could be because you haven't synced the current contrib tree. I don't see any difference in performance between the two (from roughly 92 milliseconds away on the net). --lyndon
Re: [9fans] new sources
Please mail reports, good or bad, to me, not 9fans; there's no need to add to the volume of traffic on 9fans for this. How about we convince the mailing list software to stop inserting Reply-To headers.