Re: [abcusers] Chord notation

2001-02-28 Thread Laurie Griffiths

That's somewhere near where I was a week or few ago.  I'm not sure it's
enough.

The question is "what's in the standard set?".  I had (from memory) major,
minor, diminished, augmented, 6th, seventh, major seventh, ninth, just (the
root), just (root and fifth) and a mechanism for adding an extra bass note.
I also suggested a mechanism to allow people to define extra chords.

Frank Nordberg replied to the effect that I was disabling ABC for all jazz
guitarists. (Now as it happens I don't like listening to jazz guitar, but
sssh!  Don't tell).  I very definitely don't want to do anything to stop
them from doing their thing, and that includes doing it with ABC.  (The
Internet is a big place.  None of them have said that I have to listen to
their music, so I wanna be friends).

As you may gather from the above I am not a jazz guitarist.
I don't know whether C7(9)+13 is gibberish or meaningful or, if meaningful,
what it might mean.  I just know that there are people (including Frank) who
need things which (to my eye) look like that and I think BUT DON'T KNOW (I
floated it here and Frank didn't reply) that the extension mechanism that I
had proposed was inadequate because it would in effect have meant either
including a "boiler plate" of thousands of chords at the start of every jazz
guitar file or else writing out a definition of (almost) every chord to be
used.  So I think he wanted a language which in effect put just about
anything one could dream of in the starter set.  I hope some time tomorrow
to look through Mike Whitaker's the language proposal again, but I am in no
position to judge it.

FRANK ARE YOU THERE???  Neither I nor any other non-jazz guitarist can speak
for you.  I *did* read what you said.  I think I see your point.  I can
*not* do anything about it on my own.  If neither you nor anyone else who is
into jazz speaks up then we *will* get something that will work for the rest
of us and whether it will work for you will be a matter of luck.

Laurie
- Original Message -
From: Wil Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] Chord notation


How's this?

- People can, and will put anything in between quotes.  A notation program
will at a minimum place exactly what was written in between the quotes in
the standard
place
for guitar chords for that program.
- Programs which support placement modifiers ("_","^","","") will use them
consistently
to mean
below, above, to the left and to the right of the staff symbol.
- Programs which support transposition of chords will clearly document the
chords that
can
be transposed (so people can clean up afterwards)
- programs which support sound output will support a standard set of chords
that can be unambiguously documented. At a minimum a chord which is not
recognized can be played as the root (or silence?)
- programs may support other syntaxes of chords (not in the standard set) by
assigning documented synonyms to the standard set. [someday we may
standardize the syntax

for defining chords and assigning synonyms, but that can wait]

Mike Whitaker wrote:

 On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 05:34:23PM +0100, Frank Nordberg wrote:
  Example:
  The chord C E G Bb D
  is notated:
  C9
 
  If we want to sharpen the 9th, we can just add a + in front of it:
  C+9

 I';d further note that I just showed my wife this mail, without
 any prompting bar 'what's that chord' and her reaction (she's a
 keys player) was "C augmented 9th", i.e C E *G#* Bb D".

 Can we just abandon the idea of "+" and "-", please? It is TOO ambiguous,
 as I keep saying. There are no problems with # and b that cannot
demonstrably
 be resolved with judicious use of brackets.

 From my test harness for parsechord:

 mike@andor:~$ ./parsechord 'C(#9)'
 C E G Bb D#
 mike@andor:~$ ./parsechord 'C#9'
 C# E# G# B D#
 mike@andor:~$ ./parsechord 'Caug9'
 C E G# Bb D
 --
 Mike Whitaker | Work: +44 1733 766619 | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 System Architext  | Fax:  +44 1733 348287 | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CricInfo Ltd  | GSM:  +44 7971 977375 | Web: http://www.cricinfo.com/
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

--
Wil Macaulay email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice:  +1-(905)-886-7818  xt2253FAX: +1-(905)-886-7824
Syndesis Ltd. 28 Fulton Way Richmond Hill, Ont Canada L4B 1J5
"... pay no attention to the man behind the curtain ..."


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



[abcusers] Chord notation

2001-02-28 Thread Jack Campin

 [someday we may standardize the syntax for defining chords and assigning
 synonyms, but that can wait]

No it can't wait.  The current proposals are tending towards minuscule
tinkering with the existing spec, adding no new functionality.  Frank's
tirade about ABC being mired in the idioms of British Isles folk music
was dead on target; the one genre where a much more expressive chord
system would help is jazz, and there is *no point whatever* in fidgety
little tweaks if they don't *fully* support its harmonic idioms.  The
only remotely plausible way to do it is by allowing user extensibility.
Get this right and a whole new user community can make use of ABC.  In
comparison with something like the V: or w: fields this is trivial, so
why standardize a half-arsed modificaltion?


: To be honest, I wouldn't feel bad if, at this stage in the development
: of abc, there were no notation for chords with missing notes.

Nowadays, the most popular button boxes for Irish music omit the thirds
in the bass chords (and some other designs let you switch them in and
out).  It's crazy not to support one of the central instruments of the
most popular genre ABC is used for.

=== http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/ ===


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Chord notation

2001-02-28 Thread Frank Nordberg



Laurie Griffiths wrote:
 
 I don't know whether C7(9)+13 is gibberish or meaningful or, if meaningful,
 what it might mean.

I'd say C7 with an added augmented 13 - and throw in the ninth too if
you like)

In other words:
C-G-E-Bb-A# with an optional D
(Of course you have to be really concerned about details to
differentiate between Bb and A#, but it *does* make sense)

 
 FRANK ARE YOU THERE???



Sure. The reason why I haven't posted anything on this thread recently
is simply that Mike's proposition seems to me to cover all
eventualities. There are a few details I disagree about, but nothing
really important.



Frank


---
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Chord notation

2001-02-28 Thread Phil Taylor

Mike Whitaker wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:19:06AM -0600, Richard L Walker wrote:
 Why not use everything?  If you pick up a book of chords it can be daunting,
 but allowing a program to build any chord should be very straightforward.

*sounds of faint weeping*
I've done this.
I posted the semi-formal grammar to the list.
I put a CGI up on the web which follows this grammar and parses almost
any chord you can name.
I've been trying to advance this whole argument for two weeks.
*shuffles off, stage left, to mass indifferemce*

Don't despair, Mike.  A large proportion of people reading this list
won't want to comment on your proposal, either because they are not
into complex chord symbols or don't understand the formal grammar or
whatever.  Give us the proposal again in English, styled as in the
draft standard and let's see what comment that generates.

Phil Taylor


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



[abcusers] Fiddle forum

2001-02-28 Thread Frank Nordberg

Just got this e mail and thought somebody at abcusers might be interested.

Frank Nordberg



Kyle Aaron wrote:
 
 Hello, Friends!
 
 My name is Kyle Aaron. I am a Commercial Music Major
 at South Plains College in Levelland, Texas. I just
 finished my new web site, "The Fiddle Forum"!
 
 This is an open discussion page for professional and
 non-professional fiddle players and violinists of any
 style. The forum is seperated into seperate discussion
 areas for a number of different topics including:
 Different Genres of Music associated with the violin,
 Discussion areas for the instrument and its
 accessories, And other forums including a for
 sale/trade forum and an off-topic hang out to get to
 know eachother better!
 
 You have to register before you can post, but once
 youre registered, you're always welcome. So I invite
 you to join along. This forum is brand new and needs
 members to be successful. The more members, the better
 the discussions become. So if you have friends who
 play, be sure to forward this message to them.
 
 I hope to see you there! Here's the adress:
 http://pub54.ezboard.com/bfiddleforum
 
 Thank you,
 
 Kyle Aaron-Fiddle Forum Host



---
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html