Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-03 Thread Laura Conrad

> "laurie" == laurie griffiths  writes:

laurie> I'd better wait and see what Jack and Phil say - but there seem to me to be
laurie> many Scotsmen that consider their variant of English a separate language
laurie> (some of Burns poetry can be pretty impenetrable to us English).

Certainly it's farther from "English" English than American English
is.  But we do have our own army.  

But I think there's another factor, which is whether a language is the
"lingua franca".  When French was, all kinds of incomprehensible
variants like Haitian Creole went on calling themselves French.  Now
that English is, it's tempting to say that what you speak is the
"English" that will get you jobs, even when it's pretty different.
The same thing probably happened when Latin was metamorphosing into
what are now the Romance Languages.

-- 
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097  fax: (801) 365-6574 
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-03 Thread Laurie (ukonline)

Let's see; Scotland  does  have  its own parliament now, but it doesn't have
its own army or navy, so it must be a dialect (and  an  inferior  one  at
that ;-).

I'd better wait and see what Jack and Phil say - but there seem to me to be
many Scotsmen that consider their variant of English a separate language
(some of Burns poetry can be pretty impenetrable to us English).

[How to tell if someone is Scottish - ask them "are you Scotch?"  If you
survive the encounter, they are not!]

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-03 Thread John Chambers

Frank Nordberg writes:
| John Chambers wrote:
| > | ... And the English think that English is the language that the English
| > | speak!!
| > | Laurie
| >
| > Yeah, well, the language does have more than a  few  major  dialects.
| > There's that line from My Fair Lady:  "In America they haven't spoken
| > it in years." And it's probably worth noting that the major  American
| > dictionaries  all  call  themselves  a  "Dictionary  of  the American
| > Language".
|
| Makes a lotta sense to me. Danish and Norwegian are at least as closely
| related as English and American, yet they are considered two different languages.

There's an old definition: A language is a dialect with its own army.

One of the standard themes for linguistics classes is  that  this  is
not  just funny; it's often the real definition.  There is a standard
linguistic definition, but it has the same boundary  problem  as  the
biologists'  definition  of  "species".  There are lots of borderline
cases, or rather, cases where the border doesn't really exist.  Local
politics then defines the terms used.

Is Lallans a dialect of English, or a different language?  Let's see;
Scotland  does  have  its own parliament now, but it doesn't have its
own army or navy, so it must be a dialect (and  an  inferior  one  at
that ;-).

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-03 Thread Frank Nordberg



John Chambers wrote:
> 
> | ... And the English think that English is the language that the English
> | speak!!
> | Laurie
> 
> Yeah, well, the language does have more than a  few  major  dialects.
> There's that line from My Fair Lady:  "In America they haven't spoken
> it in years." And it's probably worth noting that the major  American
> dictionaries  all  call  themselves  a  "Dictionary  of  the American
> Language".

Makes a lotta sense to me. Danish and Norwegian are at least as closely
related as English and American, yet they are considered two different languages.



Forgeot Eric wrote:
> 
> When I've been in Bodø and Nord-Norge in winter (Jul), I thought
> it was HEAVEN (or to be more correct, VALHALL) ! :)

Drop me a line next time you're here, will you?



Frank Nordberg
http://www.musicaviva.com


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-01 Thread John Chambers

| ... And the English think that English is the language that the English
| speak!!
| Laurie

Yeah, well, the language does have more than a  few  major  dialects.
There's that line from My Fair Lady:  "In America they haven't spoken
it in years." And it's probably worth noting that the major  American
dictionaries  all  call  themselves  a  "Dictionary  of  the American
Language".  This goes counter to the fact that most  Americans  claim
they speak English.  But common terminology is decidedly fuzzy.

It is common to observe that the spoken dialects have diverged a  lot
more  than the written forms.  This is probably the only good feature
of our demented spelling "system".

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-01 Thread Iain Anderson

Sorry sent wrong reference

http://www.ipnsig.org/techinfo.htm -see pdf document - Interplanetary 
Internet: Architectural Definition

--On Monday, July 01, 2002 13:40:45 + Thomas Bending 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> > Any other Brightons there may be need qualification eg Brighton,
>> > Planet Zog.
>>
>> When it comes to announcements on the web, it's safe to assume it
>> happens on earth. All other semi-civilized planets have their own
>> (mutually incompatible) networks, and as for *civilized* planets - I
>> guess they've got the sense not to mess with this mess at all ;-) ;-) ;-)
>
> Mutually incompatible? Surely not. Several sci-fi movies (mentioning
> no Independence Days) make it clear that it's easy to link your
> network to that of the aliens, even if they're presumably trying to
> stop you. So conversely we must assume the aliens are all using the
> abcusers list, even though we don't see many of their posts. Even
> now debate is raging over an illegal adaptation of the ":"
> control code by players of the octoventral heebiephone...
>
> Thomas Bending
>
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
> http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
>



Jethro Anderson - DBA (ISYS) University of Bristol
Pigsty Morris   City Clickers Step and Clog
Instep Research Team  Insword Rapper

"Never give a sword to a man who can't dance"
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-01 Thread Iain Anderson

see

http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt

--On Monday, July 01, 2002 13:40:45 + Thomas Bending 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> > Any other Brightons there may be need qualification eg Brighton,
>> > Planet Zog.
>>
>> When it comes to announcements on the web, it's safe to assume it
>> happens on earth. All other semi-civilized planets have their own
>> (mutually incompatible) networks, and as for *civilized* planets - I
>> guess they've got the sense not to mess with this mess at all ;-) ;-) ;-)
>
> Mutually incompatible? Surely not. Several sci-fi movies (mentioning
> no Independence Days) make it clear that it's easy to link your
> network to that of the aliens, even if they're presumably trying to
> stop you. So conversely we must assume the aliens are all using the
> abcusers list, even though we don't see many of their posts. Even
> now debate is raging over an illegal adaptation of the ":"
> control code by players of the octoventral heebiephone...
>
> Thomas Bending
>
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
> http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
>



Jethro Anderson - DBA (ISYS) University of Bristol
Pigsty Morris   City Clickers Step and Clog
Instep Research Team  Insword Rapper

"Never give a sword to a man who can't dance"
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-07-01 Thread Thomas Bending

> > Any other Brightons there may be need qualification eg Brighton,
> > Planet Zog.
> 
> When it comes to announcements on the web, it's safe to assume it
> happens on earth. All other semi-civilized planets have their own
> (mutually incompatible) networks, and as for *civilized* planets - I
> guess they've got the sense not to mess with this mess at all ;-) ;-) ;-)

Mutually incompatible? Surely not. Several sci-fi movies (mentioning 
no Independence Days) make it clear that it's easy to link your 
network to that of the aliens, even if they're presumably trying to 
stop you. So conversely we must assume the aliens are all using the 
abcusers list, even though we don't see many of their posts. Even 
now debate is raging over an illegal adaptation of the ":" 
control code by players of the octoventral heebiephone...

Thomas Bending

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Intergalactic naming conventions.

2002-06-30 Thread Laurie (ukonline)

... And the English think that English is the language that the English
speak!!
Laurie

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html