yes all friends i am agree
On 4/8/15, accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in wrote:
Send AccessIndia mailing list submissions to
accessindia@accessindia.org.in
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
You can reach the person managing the list at
accessindia-ow...@accessindia.org.in
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of AccessIndia digest...
Please do not reply to this digest mail. You should put your comments into a
new mail with appropriate subject line.
___
AccessIndia mailing list
AccessIndia@accessindia.org.in
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Fwd: Urgent read: Glare on writing test rules for
disabled (Vamshi. G)
2. Hi (ahmedj4u)
3. tikona wireless broadband review needed (gufran ahmed)
4. Re: IE crashes while uploading files (Himanshu Sahu)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:47:36 +0530
From: Vamshi. G gvamsh...@gmail.com
To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues
concerning the disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: Re: [AI] Fwd: Urgent read: Glare on writing test rules for
disabled
Message-ID:
caa7-5_zoa6ukuh1xbo_ja6q2rygwtjhptkidj9u5qhcvwpc...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
May be candidates familiar with assistive technology can be allowed to
take examinations on the computers. This might allow more stricter
invisilation on others who opt for a scribe. The option can be given
to the candidates to choose between the two.
On 4/7/15, Mohib Anwar Rafay mohibra...@gmail.com wrote:
What has been the argument of UPSC in this regard, they say that when
we were invited for suggestions on this policy document, we gave our
input, but MSJE hasn't taken any of our objections and didn't reply
back.
I think the most objectionable clause of MSJE guidelines, where no
examination conducting authorities is willing to comply with it, is
educational qualification of the scribe. There should be a cirtain
capping on the educational qualification somewhere. I am not talking
about specifying a lower level of the qualification of the scribe, but
cirtainly it must be implemented in such a way that subject expert
must not be there as a scribe of the candidate. It cirtainly gives a
doubt in their mind, and forget about that you can bring a change in
their way of thinking in this regard.
I strongly believe that question paper must be provided in accessible
format and computers with screenreader should be provided in objective
type of exams where ever candidate desire so.
I will be approaching to UPSC this time to provide question paper in
soft copy along with screenreader enabled computer system.
What is the benefit of such guidelines where even after 2 years of
their declaration, almost all importent examination conducting bodies
don't allow more than a class 12th standard boy as your scribe. And it
is just because of that one absurd clause of 'no educational
qualification' of the scribe. It must be immediatly replaced with a
provision having reasonable restriction upon the qualification of the
writer.
It is harming us, nobody will implement it, and you can not buy them
on the condition of strengthening the invigilation.
When I appeared in Delhi Judicial services exams conducted by Delhi
High Court last year, even the Registrar exams (who are themselves
judges) struck down the recommendation of CCPD upon my case, and they
didn't agree even on the point that? a a student of law
undergraduation(having lesser qualification than stipulated
eligibility to the post of civil judge) could be my scribe. So how can
you implement such unreasonable rules?
On 4/7/15, Mohib Anwar Rafay mohibra...@gmail.com wrote:
Last week I appeared in one of the exams conducted by Uttar Pradesh
Public Service Commission, initially they denied me to avail the
service of the scribe, because according to them, only those
candidates are permissible to avail the services of the scribe who are
100% blind.
I had to have a long arguments with them, the matter was resolved with
the intervention of Sector Magistrate? and joint Commissioner exams
PSC when I asked them to give me in writing under their seal that they
are denying me to appear in the exam on this condition. I threatened
magistrate and commissioner to file writ against them in high court
and ensure their personal appearance in the court to assert on this
arbitrary and discretionary rule.
Ultimately they allowed me to
