Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again
Hi Factually, Jaws was not the first screen reader. Anyways, it does not matter much. CAB was really a free screen reader which was called Tiny Talk. Harish - Original Message - From: "Bhavya shah" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again Hi, P L Sir, And I was under the impression that JAWS for DOS was the only screen reader in existence, or at least in dominance on the DOS platform... By the way, was there something like the Flipper or similarly worded screen reader as well, I remember reading it somewhere... Ashik Sir, Thanks for the appreciation. Thanks. On 5/2/15, Ashik wrote: Dear Bhavya, I am amazed to see that you read all these mails in details and reply to all the comment makers addressing their names. I appreciate your balanced attitude. - Original Message - From: "Bhavya shah" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 3:38 AM Subject: Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again Hi, Guffran Sir, Firstly, glad to see that you are now onboard the NVDA Users list. Now, coming to your actual points: Which form field in particular on which webpage are you talking about? In terms of web support, NVDA is more or less indisputantly the winner. Regarding mouseover links, raise that on the NVDA Users list, I'm not fully sure of that. Him Prasad Sir, Excellent and appropriate analogy used to describe the situation between the two. Hozefa Sir, I agree with Ashik Sir, we are simply encouraging and promoting the use of free and open source assistive technology whose development is progressive, active and full of potentials. JAWS must have had been the first in the screen reader industry, but, NVDA is changing the situation by offering amazing competition to JAWS, that too, at no cost. Vedprakash Sir, The bottomline of yours, and others' messages is to try and improve the product you like. There were some bugs and limitations of NVDA which I reported myself, and were fixed eventually through code contribution from the community more than the lead developers themselves. Sanjay Sir, Never heard of this CAB, could someone provide detailed information to quench my curiosity? Thanks. On 5/1/15, sanjay wrote: No. before the advent of jaws and windows, blind people were using computers by a speech synthesiser called CAB (computer assistance for the blind) - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:04 PM Subject: [Bulk] Re: [AI] NVDA better again I agree that NVDA is playing a vital role by providing more or less same functionality compared to JAWS. But we should not forget that JAWS is the first screen reader which enabled the visually challenged to operate computer. If you have any complaints for JAWS regarding its functionality, you can write to Freedom Scientific tech support instead of complaining here. On 5/1/15, Ashik wrote: No, we don't critize JAWS. We just favour NVDA. We are not concerned with what JAWS does or does not. We are just happy that NVDA does all these with asking for any money. The developers are very enthusiastic and concerned about the needs of the visually impaired. - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again According to me, too much criticism is made for JAWS. On 5/1/15, gufran ahmed wrote: @Bhavya what i want to say that in jaws, we simply enter the desired word and press enter. the jaws leaves the form field. but in nvda, we have to press escape key in-order to leave the form field. another issue is onmouse over issue. in jaws we press insert+ctro+enter keys to activate the same. but i don't think that no option is available in nvda. On 4/30/15, Bhavya shah wrote: Hi, Guffran, Your query is unclear to me. It may help if you could elaborate/ellucidate. For anyone wanting to learn more about NVDA, I would strongly recommend subscribing to the NVDA Users list by sending a mail to nvda-requ...@freelists.org with the subject of Subscribe. Access India is a healthy group with a wealth of knowledge, however, the NVDA Users list is a more specialized group for NVDA Users, being the first one to receive official announcements. Also, a code contributor and Korean maintainer of the NVDA project, Joseph Lee, has created an audio tutorial series for new and existing users covering basic to advanced topics of NVDA. The tutorials are available freely on his website, whose link can be shared by me on demand. Thanks. On 4/30/15, Lissy
Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again
Hi, P L Sir, And I was under the impression that JAWS for DOS was the only screen reader in existence, or at least in dominance on the DOS platform... By the way, was there something like the Flipper or similarly worded screen reader as well, I remember reading it somewhere... Ashik Sir, Thanks for the appreciation. Thanks. On 5/2/15, Ashik wrote: > Dear Bhavya, > > I am amazed to see that you read all these mails in details and reply to all > > the comment makers addressing their names. I appreciate your balanced > attitude. > - Original Message - > From: "Bhavya shah" > To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues > concerningthe disabled." > Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 3:38 AM > Subject: Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again > > >> Hi, >> Guffran Sir, >> Firstly, glad to see that you are now onboard the NVDA Users list. >> Now, coming to your actual points: >> Which form field in particular on which webpage are you talking about? >> In terms of web support, NVDA is more or less indisputantly the >> winner. >> Regarding mouseover links, raise that on the NVDA Users list, I'm not >> fully sure of that. >> Him Prasad Sir, >> Excellent and appropriate analogy used to describe the situation >> between the two. >> Hozefa Sir, >> I agree with Ashik Sir, we are simply encouraging and promoting the >> use of free and open source assistive technology whose development is >> progressive, active and full of potentials. JAWS must have had been >> the first in the screen reader industry, but, NVDA is changing the >> situation by offering amazing competition to JAWS, that too, at no >> cost. >> Vedprakash Sir, >> The bottomline of yours, and others' messages is to try and improve >> the product you like. There were some bugs and limitations of NVDA >> which I reported myself, and were fixed eventually through code >> contribution from the community more than the lead developers >> themselves. >> Sanjay Sir, >> Never heard of this CAB, could someone provide detailed information to >> quench my curiosity? >> Thanks. >> >> On 5/1/15, sanjay wrote: >>> No. before the advent of jaws and windows, blind people were using >>> computers >>> >>> by a speech synthesiser called CAB (computer assistance for the blind) >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Hozefa Tambawala" >>> To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>> concerningthe disabled." >>> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:04 PM >>> Subject: [Bulk] Re: [AI] NVDA better again >>> >>> >>>>I agree that NVDA is playing a vital role by providing more or less >>>> same functionality compared to JAWS. But we should not forget that >>>> JAWS is the first screen reader which enabled the visually challenged >>>> to operate computer. >>>> >>>> If you have any complaints for JAWS regarding its functionality, you >>>> can write to Freedom Scientific tech support instead of complaining >>>> here. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/1/15, Ashik wrote: >>>>> No, we don't critize JAWS. We just favour NVDA. We are not concerned >>>>> with >>>>> what JAWS does or does not. We are just happy that NVDA does all these >>>>> with >>>>> >>>>> asking for any money. The developers are very enthusiastic and >>>>> concerned >>>>> about the needs of the visually impaired. >>>>> - Original Message - >>>>> From: "Hozefa Tambawala" >>>>> To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>>> concerningthe disabled." >>>>> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 10:21 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> According to me, too much criticism is made for JAWS. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/1/15, gufran ahmed wrote: >>>>>>> @Bhavya what i want to say that in jaws, we simply enter the desired >>>>>>> word and press enter. the jaws leaves the form field. but in nvda, >>>>>>> we >>>>>>> have to press escape key in-order to leave the form field. >>>>>>> another issue is onmouse over issue. in jaws we press >>>>>>> insert+ctro+enter keys to activate the same. but i don't thi
Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again
Dear Bhavya, I am amazed to see that you read all these mails in details and reply to all the comment makers addressing their names. I appreciate your balanced attitude. - Original Message - From: "Bhavya shah" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 3:38 AM Subject: Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again Hi, Guffran Sir, Firstly, glad to see that you are now onboard the NVDA Users list. Now, coming to your actual points: Which form field in particular on which webpage are you talking about? In terms of web support, NVDA is more or less indisputantly the winner. Regarding mouseover links, raise that on the NVDA Users list, I'm not fully sure of that. Him Prasad Sir, Excellent and appropriate analogy used to describe the situation between the two. Hozefa Sir, I agree with Ashik Sir, we are simply encouraging and promoting the use of free and open source assistive technology whose development is progressive, active and full of potentials. JAWS must have had been the first in the screen reader industry, but, NVDA is changing the situation by offering amazing competition to JAWS, that too, at no cost. Vedprakash Sir, The bottomline of yours, and others' messages is to try and improve the product you like. There were some bugs and limitations of NVDA which I reported myself, and were fixed eventually through code contribution from the community more than the lead developers themselves. Sanjay Sir, Never heard of this CAB, could someone provide detailed information to quench my curiosity? Thanks. On 5/1/15, sanjay wrote: No. before the advent of jaws and windows, blind people were using computers by a speech synthesiser called CAB (computer assistance for the blind) - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:04 PM Subject: [Bulk] Re: [AI] NVDA better again I agree that NVDA is playing a vital role by providing more or less same functionality compared to JAWS. But we should not forget that JAWS is the first screen reader which enabled the visually challenged to operate computer. If you have any complaints for JAWS regarding its functionality, you can write to Freedom Scientific tech support instead of complaining here. On 5/1/15, Ashik wrote: No, we don't critize JAWS. We just favour NVDA. We are not concerned with what JAWS does or does not. We are just happy that NVDA does all these with asking for any money. The developers are very enthusiastic and concerned about the needs of the visually impaired. - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again According to me, too much criticism is made for JAWS. On 5/1/15, gufran ahmed wrote: @Bhavya what i want to say that in jaws, we simply enter the desired word and press enter. the jaws leaves the form field. but in nvda, we have to press escape key in-order to leave the form field. another issue is onmouse over issue. in jaws we press insert+ctro+enter keys to activate the same. but i don't think that no option is available in nvda. On 4/30/15, Bhavya shah wrote: Hi, Guffran, Your query is unclear to me. It may help if you could elaborate/ellucidate. For anyone wanting to learn more about NVDA, I would strongly recommend subscribing to the NVDA Users list by sending a mail to nvda-requ...@freelists.org with the subject of Subscribe. Access India is a healthy group with a wealth of knowledge, however, the NVDA Users list is a more specialized group for NVDA Users, being the first one to receive official announcements. Also, a code contributor and Korean maintainer of the NVDA project, Joseph Lee, has created an audio tutorial series for new and existing users covering basic to advanced topics of NVDA. The tutorials are available freely on his website, whose link can be shared by me on demand. Thanks. On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: Even I decide to bid farewell to JAWS from now onwards. Why should I search for cracks when there is a large group of dedicated developers for NVDA? Good-bye JAWS. On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: I am unable to chat using gmail standard view with NVDA...so I stick with JAWS. Any tips on easy navigation in Standard view while chatting with NVDA? That is the only trouble I face with NVDA. Thank you! Lissy Verghese On 4/27/15, gufran ahmed wrote: only one issue which i feel irritate and that is form field, in jaws we simply enter the keyword and press enter, it will give the result. but in NVDA, we have to press escape key each time followed by the desired value. otherwice it is the best screen reader instead. On 4/26/15, Bh
Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again
i personally used a speech synthesiser called speaqualizer a product of american printing house for the blind. i used it for ten years from1990 to 2000 on a dos platform. - Original Message - From: "Bhavya shah" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 3:38 AM Subject: Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again Hi, Guffran Sir, Firstly, glad to see that you are now onboard the NVDA Users list. Now, coming to your actual points: Which form field in particular on which webpage are you talking about? In terms of web support, NVDA is more or less indisputantly the winner. Regarding mouseover links, raise that on the NVDA Users list, I'm not fully sure of that. Him Prasad Sir, Excellent and appropriate analogy used to describe the situation between the two. Hozefa Sir, I agree with Ashik Sir, we are simply encouraging and promoting the use of free and open source assistive technology whose development is progressive, active and full of potentials. JAWS must have had been the first in the screen reader industry, but, NVDA is changing the situation by offering amazing competition to JAWS, that too, at no cost. Vedprakash Sir, The bottomline of yours, and others' messages is to try and improve the product you like. There were some bugs and limitations of NVDA which I reported myself, and were fixed eventually through code contribution from the community more than the lead developers themselves. Sanjay Sir, Never heard of this CAB, could someone provide detailed information to quench my curiosity? Thanks. On 5/1/15, sanjay wrote: No. before the advent of jaws and windows, blind people were using computers by a speech synthesiser called CAB (computer assistance for the blind) - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:04 PM Subject: [Bulk] Re: [AI] NVDA better again I agree that NVDA is playing a vital role by providing more or less same functionality compared to JAWS. But we should not forget that JAWS is the first screen reader which enabled the visually challenged to operate computer. If you have any complaints for JAWS regarding its functionality, you can write to Freedom Scientific tech support instead of complaining here. On 5/1/15, Ashik wrote: No, we don't critize JAWS. We just favour NVDA. We are not concerned with what JAWS does or does not. We are just happy that NVDA does all these with asking for any money. The developers are very enthusiastic and concerned about the needs of the visually impaired. - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again According to me, too much criticism is made for JAWS. On 5/1/15, gufran ahmed wrote: @Bhavya what i want to say that in jaws, we simply enter the desired word and press enter. the jaws leaves the form field. but in nvda, we have to press escape key in-order to leave the form field. another issue is onmouse over issue. in jaws we press insert+ctro+enter keys to activate the same. but i don't think that no option is available in nvda. On 4/30/15, Bhavya shah wrote: Hi, Guffran, Your query is unclear to me. It may help if you could elaborate/ellucidate. For anyone wanting to learn more about NVDA, I would strongly recommend subscribing to the NVDA Users list by sending a mail to nvda-requ...@freelists.org with the subject of Subscribe. Access India is a healthy group with a wealth of knowledge, however, the NVDA Users list is a more specialized group for NVDA Users, being the first one to receive official announcements. Also, a code contributor and Korean maintainer of the NVDA project, Joseph Lee, has created an audio tutorial series for new and existing users covering basic to advanced topics of NVDA. The tutorials are available freely on his website, whose link can be shared by me on demand. Thanks. On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: Even I decide to bid farewell to JAWS from now onwards. Why should I search for cracks when there is a large group of dedicated developers for NVDA? Good-bye JAWS. On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: I am unable to chat using gmail standard view with NVDA...so I stick with JAWS. Any tips on easy navigation in Standard view while chatting with NVDA? That is the only trouble I face with NVDA. Thank you! Lissy Verghese On 4/27/15, gufran ahmed wrote: only one issue which i feel irritate and that is form field, in jaws we simply enter the keyword and press enter, it will give the result. but in NVDA, we have to press escape key each time followed by the desired value. otherwice it is the best screen reader instead. On 4/26/15, Bh
Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again
Hi, Guffran Sir, Firstly, glad to see that you are now onboard the NVDA Users list. Now, coming to your actual points: Which form field in particular on which webpage are you talking about? In terms of web support, NVDA is more or less indisputantly the winner. Regarding mouseover links, raise that on the NVDA Users list, I'm not fully sure of that. Him Prasad Sir, Excellent and appropriate analogy used to describe the situation between the two. Hozefa Sir, I agree with Ashik Sir, we are simply encouraging and promoting the use of free and open source assistive technology whose development is progressive, active and full of potentials. JAWS must have had been the first in the screen reader industry, but, NVDA is changing the situation by offering amazing competition to JAWS, that too, at no cost. Vedprakash Sir, The bottomline of yours, and others' messages is to try and improve the product you like. There were some bugs and limitations of NVDA which I reported myself, and were fixed eventually through code contribution from the community more than the lead developers themselves. Sanjay Sir, Never heard of this CAB, could someone provide detailed information to quench my curiosity? Thanks. On 5/1/15, sanjay wrote: > No. before the advent of jaws and windows, blind people were using computers > > by a speech synthesiser called CAB (computer assistance for the blind) > > - Original Message - > From: "Hozefa Tambawala" > To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues > concerningthe disabled." > Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:04 PM > Subject: [Bulk] Re: [AI] NVDA better again > > >>I agree that NVDA is playing a vital role by providing more or less >> same functionality compared to JAWS. But we should not forget that >> JAWS is the first screen reader which enabled the visually challenged >> to operate computer. >> >> If you have any complaints for JAWS regarding its functionality, you >> can write to Freedom Scientific tech support instead of complaining >> here. >> >> >> On 5/1/15, Ashik wrote: >>> No, we don't critize JAWS. We just favour NVDA. We are not concerned >>> with >>> what JAWS does or does not. We are just happy that NVDA does all these >>> with >>> >>> asking for any money. The developers are very enthusiastic and concerned >>> about the needs of the visually impaired. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Hozefa Tambawala" >>> To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>> concerningthe disabled." >>> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 10:21 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again >>> >>> According to me, too much criticism is made for JAWS. On 5/1/15, gufran ahmed wrote: > @Bhavya what i want to say that in jaws, we simply enter the desired > word and press enter. the jaws leaves the form field. but in nvda, we > have to press escape key in-order to leave the form field. > another issue is onmouse over issue. in jaws we press > insert+ctro+enter keys to activate the same. but i don't think that no > option is available in nvda. > > On 4/30/15, Bhavya shah wrote: >> Hi, >> Guffran, >> Your query is unclear to me. It may help if you could >> elaborate/ellucidate. >> For anyone wanting to learn more about NVDA, I would strongly >> recommend subscribing to the NVDA Users list by sending a mail to >> nvda-requ...@freelists.org with the subject of Subscribe. Access >> India >> is a healthy group with a wealth of knowledge, however, the NVDA >> Users >> list is a more specialized group for NVDA Users, being the first one >> to receive official announcements. >> Also, a code contributor and Korean maintainer of the NVDA project, >> Joseph Lee, has created an audio tutorial series for new and existing >> users covering basic to advanced topics of NVDA. The tutorials are >> available freely on his website, whose link can be shared by me on >> demand. >> Thanks. >> >> On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: >>> Even I decide to bid farewell to JAWS from now onwards. Why should I >>> search for cracks when there is a large group of dedicated >>> developers >>> for NVDA? Good-bye JAWS. >>> >>> >>> On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: I am unable to chat using gmail standard view with NVDA...so I stick with JAWS. Any tips on easy navigation in Standard view while chatting with NVDA? That is the only trouble I face with NVDA. Thank you! Lissy Verghese On 4/27/15, gufran ahmed wrote: > only one issue which i feel irritate and that is form field, in > jaws > we simply enter the keyword and press enter, it will give the > result. > but in NVDA, we have to press escape key each time followed by the > desired value. otherwice it is the best screen reader instead. > > O
Re: [AI] [Bulk] Re: NVDA better again
No. before the advent of jaws and windows, blind people were using computers by a speech synthesiser called CAB (computer assistance for the blind) - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:04 PM Subject: [Bulk] Re: [AI] NVDA better again I agree that NVDA is playing a vital role by providing more or less same functionality compared to JAWS. But we should not forget that JAWS is the first screen reader which enabled the visually challenged to operate computer. If you have any complaints for JAWS regarding its functionality, you can write to Freedom Scientific tech support instead of complaining here. On 5/1/15, Ashik wrote: No, we don't critize JAWS. We just favour NVDA. We are not concerned with what JAWS does or does not. We are just happy that NVDA does all these with asking for any money. The developers are very enthusiastic and concerned about the needs of the visually impaired. - Original Message - From: "Hozefa Tambawala" To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled." Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again According to me, too much criticism is made for JAWS. On 5/1/15, gufran ahmed wrote: @Bhavya what i want to say that in jaws, we simply enter the desired word and press enter. the jaws leaves the form field. but in nvda, we have to press escape key in-order to leave the form field. another issue is onmouse over issue. in jaws we press insert+ctro+enter keys to activate the same. but i don't think that no option is available in nvda. On 4/30/15, Bhavya shah wrote: Hi, Guffran, Your query is unclear to me. It may help if you could elaborate/ellucidate. For anyone wanting to learn more about NVDA, I would strongly recommend subscribing to the NVDA Users list by sending a mail to nvda-requ...@freelists.org with the subject of Subscribe. Access India is a healthy group with a wealth of knowledge, however, the NVDA Users list is a more specialized group for NVDA Users, being the first one to receive official announcements. Also, a code contributor and Korean maintainer of the NVDA project, Joseph Lee, has created an audio tutorial series for new and existing users covering basic to advanced topics of NVDA. The tutorials are available freely on his website, whose link can be shared by me on demand. Thanks. On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: Even I decide to bid farewell to JAWS from now onwards. Why should I search for cracks when there is a large group of dedicated developers for NVDA? Good-bye JAWS. On 4/30/15, Lissy Verghese wrote: I am unable to chat using gmail standard view with NVDA...so I stick with JAWS. Any tips on easy navigation in Standard view while chatting with NVDA? That is the only trouble I face with NVDA. Thank you! Lissy Verghese On 4/27/15, gufran ahmed wrote: only one issue which i feel irritate and that is form field, in jaws we simply enter the keyword and press enter, it will give the result. but in NVDA, we have to press escape key each time followed by the desired value. otherwice it is the best screen reader instead. On 4/26/15, Bhavya shah wrote: Hi, NVDA's primary advantage is its constantly maintained and advancing web accessibility support. I closely follow NVDA development (as I believe Him Prasad Sir and Pranavlal Sir do as well), and am impressed with its development progress and its lead developers (James Teh and Michael Curren)'s responsiveness and concern towards their user base. A year or so ago, I switched to NVDA after acquiring training for JAWS, and due to the seemless and minimal learning curve, transitioned myself. The NVDA community is as vibrant as the NVDA project itself. I agree with Him Prasad Sir as the main reason for usage of JAWS being that it is the screen reader for whom training is readily available and whose crack is widely distributed. I sometimes temporarily start JAWS and find it rather uncomfortable to work with. Let us endorse NVDA and ESpeak, two excellent community driven open source accessibility related projects! Ekinath Sir, Regarding I having to have helped you with NVDA settings, you can always file a constructive and well-articulated feature request or bug report at the NVDA issue tracker, whose link has been shared by someone in this thread itself, I believe. Thanks. On 4/24/15, Pranav Lal wrote: Hi, See http://www.saksham.org/help.php They have a mechanism for accepting donations which allows you to specify the purpose for said donation. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Ashik Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 6:00 AM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issuesconcerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] NVDA better again Good that you contribute to the great cause. I too want to
