Re: [AI] SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU

2013-05-04 Thread akhilesh
Hello All,
Appropriate step at the very right time. Commendable job! Now we
should make sure that it reaches to its logical conclusion. Keep
informing the group about future development. Also post the case No.,
It will help the group to track the latest development.

All the support from my side as well!


On 5/4/13, Vikas Gupta vikas...@gmail.com wrote:
 Though all these three reports are good, the best reproduction of
 Sambhavana's press release may be seen in the Indian Express, which is
 closest to our perspective. I have not gone through other media
 reports so far. Though some news channels had also called me
 yesterday, I am not aware how did they cary it. Friends, let us use
 this oppertunity to not merely fight against the discriminatory
 provisions of four year undergraduate digree programme of Delhi
 University, but more specifically, let us strugggle to ensure that our
 needs and requirements are kept at the centerstage of any planning. I
 remember when I was a member of EOC in Delhi University, we had
 prepared a long list of books that visually challenged students would
 need to study for different courses. This list of course excluded many
  disciplines, however, whatever we had suggested, only a fracction of
 those books have been so far converted in acccessible formats. Still
 University is almost every year renewing its syllabuses without ever
 bothering to ensure that before introducing a new programme, it should
 also make adequit arrangements for protecting equal rights of
 disabled.

 Best


 Vikas



 On 5/4/13, Nikhil  Jain ni...@rediffmail.com wrote:
 Dear Friends,



 First of all, let me thank all who have been constantly supporting the
 efforts of Sambhavana in striving for an inclusive and democratic
 society.

 I am sharing with you some of the meedia report that I could lay my hand
 to.

 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/Disabled-teachers-students-move-HC-against-4-year-degree/articleshow/19875119.cms





 http://www.indianexpress.com/news/challenged-students-oppose-du-s-4yr-format/162/





 http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/NGO-files-PIL-against-DU-s-four-year-programme/Article1-1054462.aspx





 Apart from that, it is also covered in Deckan Herald, Millenium Post and
 one
 or two Hindi news papers.



 Thanks.





 Nikhil



 On Fri, 03 May 2013 21:19:02 +0530  wrote

Nishant and others at Sambhavana!







 This is a very relevant issue as most plannings by the public bodies/



 educational institutions/ government are continuously undertaken without



 considering the persons with disabilities and their specific needs. We
 have



 faced this problem in the past. When ever the CBSE/ SCERT/ NCERT etc
 change



 the courses or bring out revised editions, the diversity of students get



 left out. The authorities forget about the Braille and digital versions.







 Availability of accessible study material is a primary requirement to



 ensure equality of opportunities for persons with disabilities.If the



 course has not yet been decided before the launch of the 4 years hybrid



 course, one can well imagine the preparation of the university to launch



 this course in its true inclusive way.







 Good move and you have all the support from me.



 regards



 Subhash C. Vashishth



 Advocate



























 On 3 May 2013 17:30, Nishant Kumar Jindal  wrote:







 PRESS RELEASE  Ref.Sam/2013/127



 Dated: 03/05/2013







 SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED



 FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU







 Sambhavana, the leading organization of disabled teachers and students



 in Delhi, has filed a writ petition in the honorable High Court



 requesting a stay order against implementation of the discriminatory



 four year under-graduation programme, FYUP. It claims that the present



 design of FYUP is discriminatory as the programme does not take in to



 consideration the aspirations and specific needs of the students with



 blindness and other print-disabilities. Sambhavana organization



 strongly believes that in case the four year under graduate programme



 is introduced in its present form the student with Vision Impairment



 will suffer irreparable loss and a large number of such students will



 get excluded from the proposed benefits of this programme. Sambhavana



 objects the implementation of the proposed FYUP mainly on the



 following grounds:







 Problem Arising due to the Imposition of Compulsory



 Interdisciplinarity on Students







 In the name of interdisciplinarity, this programme requires students



 to study foundation courses from multiple streams. Two of the eleven



 foundation courses (to be studied over first two semesters) would be



 on Mathematics and Science. In most cases, blind or visually impaired



 students are discouraged or practically barred/disallowed from taking



 Science and 

Re: [AI] SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU

2013-05-03 Thread SC Vashishth
Nishant and others at Sambhavana!

This is a very relevant issue as most plannings by the public bodies/
educational institutions/ government are continuously undertaken without
considering the persons with disabilities and their specific needs. We have
faced this problem in the past. When ever the CBSE/ SCERT/ NCERT etc change
the courses or bring out revised editions, the diversity of students get
left out. The authorities forget about the Braille and digital versions.

Availability of accessible study material is a primary requirement to
ensure equality of opportunities for persons with disabilities.If the
course has not yet been decided before the launch of the 4 years hybrid
course, one can well imagine the preparation of the university to launch
this course in its true inclusive way.

Good move and you have all the support from me.
regards
Subhash C. Vashishth
Advocate






On 3 May 2013 17:30, Nishant Kumar Jindal nkjindal1...@gmail.com wrote:

 PRESS RELEASE   Ref.Sam/2013/127
 Dated: 03/05/2013

 SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED
 FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU

 Sambhavana, the leading organization of disabled teachers and students
 in Delhi, has filed a writ petition in the honorable High Court
 requesting a stay order against implementation of the discriminatory
 four year under-graduation programme, FYUP. It claims that the present
 design of FYUP is discriminatory as the programme does not take in to
 consideration the aspirations and specific needs of the students with
 blindness and other print-disabilities. Sambhavana organization
 strongly believes that in case the four year under graduate programme
 is introduced in its present form the student with Vision Impairment
 will suffer irreparable loss and a large number of such students will
 get excluded from the proposed benefits of this programme. Sambhavana
 objects the implementation of the proposed FYUP mainly on the
 following grounds:

 Problem Arising due to the Imposition of Compulsory
 Interdisciplinarity on Students

 In the name of interdisciplinarity, this programme requires students
 to study foundation courses from multiple streams. Two of the eleven
 foundation courses (to be studied over first two semesters) would be
 on Mathematics and Science. In most cases, blind or visually impaired
 students are discouraged or practically barred/disallowed from taking
 Science and Mathematics after 8th standard. Sambhavana Organization
 argues that DU, just like most of schools in Delhi or in the country,
 have not made adequate arrangements for teaching blind students
 Mathematics and Science. In the present system at Delhi University,
 not studying Maths and Science after 8th standard did not harm at
 least the immediate academic prospects of a blind student. Yet, the
 FYUP makes it compulsory for all the students to study courses that
 require prior knowledge of Science and Mathematics.
 The university has two options in this case. Either DU can exempt
 vision impaired students from studying courses that require knowledge
 of Science and Mathematics. Or it can tell those students to look for
 some other university. In either case DU would be treating people with
 visual disabilities as second class students in complete violation of
 their fundamental and other legislative rights of equal participation.

 Unavailability of Accessible Reading Material

 It has been a constant problem for students with vision impairment to
 get hold of reading material for their studies in accessible formats,
 such as Braille, E-texts, large text or audio recording. As far as the
 existing courses are concerned, at least some reading material in
 accessible formats have been accumulated over the years as a result of
 various individual and organizational initiatives, which is of course
 merely a fraction of the total number of texts prescribed . Yet, when
 it comes to the FYUP nobody is still sure what form the courses will
 take. For many of the courses there is no syllabus approved by the
 statutory bodies thus far. Even if the syllabi are ready in the month
 of May, it will take some time to print the texts and other reading
 materials for vision impaired students in accessible formats. By any
 means, this task cannot be achieved overnight. At least a year of
 systematic planning and efforts is needed. Sambhavana Organization
 believes that in the light of DU’s tendency of having no dialogue
 despite series of representations and protests by disabled students
 and teachers over last many months against the blatant disregard of
 various provisions as enshrined in the laws for disabled, it is very
 less likely that without intervention of judiciary, University would
 pay appropriate attention to protect legal rights of such students.

 Demands

 Sambhavana Organization demands from DU to have dialogue with Disabled
 Students and Teachers which is enshrined in the PWD Act and the
 UNCRPD, before 

Re: [AI] SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU

2013-05-03 Thread Nikhil Jain
Dear Friends,



First of all, let me thank all who have been constantly supporting the efforts 
of Sambhavana in striving for an inclusive and democratic society.

I am sharing with you some of the meedia report that I could lay my hand to.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/Disabled-teachers-students-move-HC-against-4-year-degree/articleshow/19875119.cms





http://www.indianexpress.com/news/challenged-students-oppose-du-s-4yr-format/162/





http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/NGO-files-PIL-against-DU-s-four-year-programme/Article1-1054462.aspx





Apart from that, it is also covered in Deckan Herald, Millenium Post and one or 
two Hindi news papers.



Thanks.





Nikhil



On Fri, 03 May 2013 21:19:02 +0530  wrote

Nishant and others at Sambhavana!







This is a very relevant issue as most plannings by the public bodies/



educational institutions/ government are continuously undertaken without



considering the persons with disabilities and their specific needs. We have



faced this problem in the past. When ever the CBSE/ SCERT/ NCERT etc change



the courses or bring out revised editions, the diversity of students get



left out. The authorities forget about the Braille and digital versions.







Availability of accessible study material is a primary requirement to



ensure equality of opportunities for persons with disabilities.If the



course has not yet been decided before the launch of the 4 years hybrid



course, one can well imagine the preparation of the university to launch



this course in its true inclusive way.







Good move and you have all the support from me.



regards



Subhash C. Vashishth



Advocate



























On 3 May 2013 17:30, Nishant Kumar Jindal  wrote:







 PRESS RELEASE  Ref.Sam/2013/127



 Dated: 03/05/2013







 SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED



 FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU







 Sambhavana, the leading organization of disabled teachers and students



 in Delhi, has filed a writ petition in the honorable High Court



 requesting a stay order against implementation of the discriminatory



 four year under-graduation programme, FYUP. It claims that the present



 design of FYUP is discriminatory as the programme does not take in to



 consideration the aspirations and specific needs of the students with



 blindness and other print-disabilities. Sambhavana organization



 strongly believes that in case the four year under graduate programme



 is introduced in its present form the student with Vision Impairment



 will suffer irreparable loss and a large number of such students will



 get excluded from the proposed benefits of this programme. Sambhavana



 objects the implementation of the proposed FYUP mainly on the



 following grounds:







 Problem Arising due to the Imposition of Compulsory



 Interdisciplinarity on Students







 In the name of interdisciplinarity, this programme requires students



 to study foundation courses from multiple streams. Two of the eleven



 foundation courses (to be studied over first two semesters) would be



 on Mathematics and Science. In most cases, blind or visually impaired



 students are discouraged or practically barred/disallowed from taking



 Science and Mathematics after 8th standard. Sambhavana Organization



 argues that DU, just like most of schools in Delhi or in the country,



 have not made adequate arrangements for teaching blind students



 Mathematics and Science. In the present system at Delhi University,



 not studying Maths and Science after 8th standard did not harm at



 least the immediate academic prospects of a blind student. Yet, the



 FYUP makes it compulsory for all the students to study courses that



 require prior knowledge of Science and Mathematics.



 The university has two options in this case. Either DU can exempt



 vision impaired students from studying courses that require knowledge



 of Science and Mathematics. Or it can tell those students to look for



 some other university. In either case DU would be treating people with



 visual disabilities as second class students in complete violation of



 their fundamental and other legislative rights of equal participation.







 Unavailability of Accessible Reading Material







 It has been a constant problem for students with vision impairment to



 get hold of reading material for their studies in accessible formats,



 such as Braille, E-texts, large text or audio recording. As far as the



 existing courses are concerned, at least some reading material in



 accessible formats have been accumulated over the years as a result of



 various individual and organizational initiatives, which is of course



 merely a fraction of the total number of texts prescribed . Yet, when



 it comes to the FYUP nobody is still sure what form the courses will



 take. For 

Re: [AI] SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU

2013-05-03 Thread Vikas Gupta
Though all these three reports are good, the best reproduction of
Sambhavana's press release may be seen in the Indian Express, which is
closest to our perspective. I have not gone through other media
reports so far. Though some news channels had also called me
yesterday, I am not aware how did they cary it. Friends, let us use
this oppertunity to not merely fight against the discriminatory
provisions of four year undergraduate digree programme of Delhi
University, but more specifically, let us strugggle to ensure that our
needs and requirements are kept at the centerstage of any planning. I
remember when I was a member of EOC in Delhi University, we had
prepared a long list of books that visually challenged students would
need to study for different courses. This list of course excluded many
 disciplines, however, whatever we had suggested, only a fracction of
those books have been so far converted in acccessible formats. Still
University is almost every year renewing its syllabuses without ever
bothering to ensure that before introducing a new programme, it should
also make adequit arrangements for protecting equal rights of
disabled.

Best


Vikas



On 5/4/13, Nikhil  Jain ni...@rediffmail.com wrote:
 Dear Friends,



 First of all, let me thank all who have been constantly supporting the
 efforts of Sambhavana in striving for an inclusive and democratic society.

 I am sharing with you some of the meedia report that I could lay my hand to.

 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/Disabled-teachers-students-move-HC-against-4-year-degree/articleshow/19875119.cms





 http://www.indianexpress.com/news/challenged-students-oppose-du-s-4yr-format/162/





 http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/NGO-files-PIL-against-DU-s-four-year-programme/Article1-1054462.aspx





 Apart from that, it is also covered in Deckan Herald, Millenium Post and one
 or two Hindi news papers.



 Thanks.





 Nikhil



 On Fri, 03 May 2013 21:19:02 +0530  wrote

Nishant and others at Sambhavana!







 This is a very relevant issue as most plannings by the public bodies/



 educational institutions/ government are continuously undertaken without



 considering the persons with disabilities and their specific needs. We have



 faced this problem in the past. When ever the CBSE/ SCERT/ NCERT etc change



 the courses or bring out revised editions, the diversity of students get



 left out. The authorities forget about the Braille and digital versions.







 Availability of accessible study material is a primary requirement to



 ensure equality of opportunities for persons with disabilities.If the



 course has not yet been decided before the launch of the 4 years hybrid



 course, one can well imagine the preparation of the university to launch



 this course in its true inclusive way.







 Good move and you have all the support from me.



 regards



 Subhash C. Vashishth



 Advocate



























 On 3 May 2013 17:30, Nishant Kumar Jindal  wrote:







 PRESS RELEASE  Ref.Sam/2013/127



 Dated: 03/05/2013







 SAMBHAVANA ORGANIZATION FILES A PIL Demanding Stay on the PROPOSED



 FOUR YEAR UNDER-GRADUATE PROGRAMME of DU







 Sambhavana, the leading organization of disabled teachers and students



 in Delhi, has filed a writ petition in the honorable High Court



 requesting a stay order against implementation of the discriminatory



 four year under-graduation programme, FYUP. It claims that the present



 design of FYUP is discriminatory as the programme does not take in to



 consideration the aspirations and specific needs of the students with



 blindness and other print-disabilities. Sambhavana organization



 strongly believes that in case the four year under graduate programme



 is introduced in its present form the student with Vision Impairment



 will suffer irreparable loss and a large number of such students will



 get excluded from the proposed benefits of this programme. Sambhavana



 objects the implementation of the proposed FYUP mainly on the



 following grounds:







 Problem Arising due to the Imposition of Compulsory



 Interdisciplinarity on Students







 In the name of interdisciplinarity, this programme requires students



 to study foundation courses from multiple streams. Two of the eleven



 foundation courses (to be studied over first two semesters) would be



 on Mathematics and Science. In most cases, blind or visually impaired



 students are discouraged or practically barred/disallowed from taking



 Science and Mathematics after 8th standard. Sambhavana Organization



 argues that DU, just like most of schools in Delhi or in the country,



 have not made adequate arrangements for teaching blind students



 Mathematics and Science. In the present system at Delhi University,



 not studying Maths and Science after 8th standard did not harm at



 least the immediate academic prospects of a