RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Alex Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable? Hi Shishir Shishir K. Singh wrote: >Same goes for forcePrincipalAsString. > > > There is already an isForcePrincipalAsString() method. > > >-Original Message- >From: Shishir K. Singh >Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:15 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really >Serializable? > >Ben, > >I was wondering if the context variable in DaoAuthenticationProvider >could be made protected or better yet, have a getContext() method. Sub >classes extending the provider then can provide their own custom >events if necessary. > > > I just added to CVS HEAD a getter for the context. Best regards Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
Patrick Burleson wrote: Thank you very much. Going to test it out today. Any ideas on the schedule for 0.6? Hi Patrick Acegi Security 0.6 will be released very soon. I'm just awaiting a Spring 1.1 RC to check everything still works. Best regards Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
Hi Shishir Shishir K. Singh wrote: Same goes for forcePrincipalAsString. There is already an isForcePrincipalAsString() method. -Original Message- From: Shishir K. Singh Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:15 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable? Ben, I was wondering if the context variable in DaoAuthenticationProvider could be made protected or better yet, have a getContext() method. Sub classes extending the provider then can provide their own custom events if necessary. I just added to CVS HEAD a getter for the context. Best regards Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
Same goes for forcePrincipalAsString. -Original Message- From: Shishir K. Singh Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:15 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable? Ben, I was wondering if the context variable in DaoAuthenticationProvider could be made protected or better yet, have a getContext() method. Sub classes extending the provider then can provide their own custom events if necessary. Thanks Shishir -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Burleson Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable? On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:40:09 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Patrick > > I've just made Authentication Serializable in CVS HEAD. > > Best regards > Ben > Ben, Thank you very much. Going to test it out today. Any ideas on the schedule for 0.6? Thanks, Patrick --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
Ben, I was wondering if the context variable in DaoAuthenticationProvider could be made protected or better yet, have a getContext() method. Sub classes extending the provider then can provide their own custom events if necessary. Thanks Shishir -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Burleson Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable? On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:40:09 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Patrick > > I've just made Authentication Serializable in CVS HEAD. > > Best regards > Ben > Ben, Thank you very much. Going to test it out today. Any ideas on the schedule for 0.6? Thanks, Patrick --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:40:09 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Patrick > > I've just made Authentication Serializable in CVS HEAD. > > Best regards > Ben > Ben, Thank you very much. Going to test it out today. Any ideas on the schedule for 0.6? Thanks, Patrick --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
Patrick Burleson wrote: It would appear to me that the Authentication isn't Serializable and thus gets rejected from my session on Weblogic (well, I get a warning that it will be upon redeployment). Is this intentional? Hi Patrick I've just made Authentication Serializable in CVS HEAD. Best regards Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
[Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really Serializable?
It would appear to me that the Authentication isn't Serializable and thus gets rejected from my session on Weblogic (well, I get a warning that it will be upon redeployment). Is this intentional? Thanks, Patrick --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
