Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-21 Thread Matt Raible
I was able to confirm that the contacts-filter sample works fine.  I'm  
fine with a 0.8.1 since I have workarounds (redirect and  
ContextHolder.setContext(null)) for both my apps.

Matt
On Mar 20, 2005, at 3:38 PM, Ben Alex wrote:
Matt Raible wrote:
Unfortunately, I looked at HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.java  
and found that I did use version 1.4 in my tests.

Matt, I'm pretty sure it works fine now. I'm using Tomcat 5.5.7 on  
Win32 with JDK 1.5.0_01. I've edited the standard logout.jsp used in  
the Contacts Sample to the following:

%@ page import=javax.servlet.http.Cookie %
%@ page  
import=net.sf.acegisecurity.ui.rememberme.TokenBasedRememberMeServices 
 %
%
session.invalidate();
Cookie terminate = new  
Cookie(TokenBasedRememberMeServices.ACEGI_SECURITY_HASHED_REMEMBER_ME_C 
OOKIE_KEY, null);
terminate.setMaxAge(0);
response.addCookie(terminate);
// response.sendRedirect(index.jsp);
%

Then:
cd core
maven clean
maven jar:install
cd ../samples/contacts
maven clean
maven multiwar:multiwar
cp target\*filter*.war $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps
Then in my browser:
Visit http://localhost:8080/acegi-security-sample-contacts-filter/
Click manage
Login as scott
Click logoff - you then get a blank page, as there is no redirect
Re-enter the home page URL,  
http://localhost:8080/acegi-security-sample-contacts-filter/
Click manage
You are prompted to login

I'd really like to release 0.8.1, but I'm holding-off on the basis of  
this issue not being confirmed as corrected. Would people please let  
me know if they can continue to reproduce this issue, or if they agree  
it's fixed.

Thanks
Ben
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real  
users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-18 Thread Ben Alex
Matt Raible wrote:
I updated from CVS and tried the new JAR on AppFuse and the security 
chapter's sample application.  The behavior continues to happen.  I'll 
try it on the Contacts sample app in few days.  Maybe anonymous CVS is 
not in synch.


Perhaps... The latest version of HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter is 
1.4. Please let me know how it goes.

Cheers
Ben
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-16 Thread Ray Krueger
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:00:42 -0700, Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was able to reproduce this problem in the Contacts sample
 application.  If logout.jsp *doesn't* do a redirect, the problem occurs
 and the user stays logged in.  If it *does* a redirect, everything works
 and the user is logged out and prompted to login again.
 
 I'm guessing the desired behavior is that session.invalidate() logs out
 the user, regardless of redirect or not.  I tried adding
 dispatcherREQUEST/dispatcher and dispatcherFORWARD/dispatcher to
 the Acegi Filter Chain Proxy, but no luck.
 
 Still digging...
 
 Matt
 
 Matt Raible wrote:
 
  FYI...
 
  I just upgraded the sample app for Spring Live to 0.8.0 and I'm
  experiencing this same issue.  Invalidating the session does not
  logout  a user.  I'll dig into Acegi Security code later tonight and
  see if the  ContextHolder is still holding an Authentication object
  outside of the  session.  That seems to be what is happening.
 
  Does my httpSessionContextIntegrationFilter need to explicitly say
  use  the session?  I tried setting allowSessionCreation to false
  and  true and neither seemed to have any effect.  Maybe my
  logout.jsp  needs to have outside of a secure URL?  I also deleted
  all my  filter-mappings except for the Acegi Security one.
 
  Matt
 
 
  On Mar 14, 2005, at 6:59 AM, Matt Raible wrote:
 
 
  On Mar 12, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Ben Alex wrote:
 
  Matt Raible wrote:
 
  Here's a link to AppFuse's applicationContext-security.xml file -
  the  filters are specified in the first bean at the top.
 
  http://tinyurl.com/6y4jd
 
  Matt, did you get it working in the end?
 
 
  Nope.
 
  As the Contacts Sample is working, it points to configuration. I
  checked the URL above and couldn't see any issues with the filter
  configuration. Could another filter (SiteMesh?) be re-creating the
  HttpSession and conflicting with the session invalidation? Consider
  this:
 
  1. HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter obtains Context from
  HttpSession and puts it in ContextHolder
  2. Session invalidated during view
  3. Some object/filter uses HttpServletRequest.getSession() or
  .getSession(true), which re-creates a new session
  4. HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter obtains a session, and
  copies  ContextHolder Context into it
  5. On next request, HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter finds
  Context  in the HttpSession
 
  The above could explain the behaviour you're observing. Especially
  as  you can ContextHolder.setContext(null) during step 2 and it
  achieves  logout. I'd try commenting out all the other non-Acegi
  Security  filters and progressively re-adding them.
 
 
  I commented out *all* the filters I have, except for the
  FilterChainProxy:
 
  filter
  filter-namesecurityFilter/filter-name
 
  filter-classnet.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy/filter-
  class
  init-param
  param-nametargetClass/param-name
 
  param-valuenet.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy/param-value
  /init-param
  /filter
 
  filter-mapping
  filter-namesecurityFilter/filter-name
  url-pattern/*/url-pattern
  /filter-mapping
 
  Then I changed logout.jsp to remove any references to tag libraries
  or  JSP declarations:
 
  %session.invalidate();%
  a href=mainMenu.htmlmainMenu.html/a
 
  The strange thing is I can click on the mainMenu.html link and I'll
  see the main menu w/o being logged in.  However, if I try to edit my
  profile (which uses request.getRemoteUser()), I get a NPE.  Here's
  my  filterChainProxy definition.
 
  bean id=filterChainProxy
  class=net.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy
  property name=filterInvocationDefinitionSource
  value
  CONVERT_URL_TO_LOWERCASE_BEFORE_COMPARISON
  PATTERN_TYPE_APACHE_ANT
   /
  **=httpSessionContextIntegrationFilter,authenticationProcessingFilter,r
  emoteUserFilter,anonymousProcessingFilter,securityEnforcementFilter
  /value
  /property
  /bean
 
  Matt
 
 
 ---
 SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
 Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
 Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
 ___
 Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
 Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
 Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
 

Hey Matt,
I was just getting ready for work and some things dawned on me.
If you are logging out the user, you should either redirect them or
bounce them out by responding with a 401 and forcing them to
re-authenticate.

If you intend to let the SecurityEncorcementFilter do the 401
response, you should have your LoginFilter first in the chain so 

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-15 Thread Matt Raible
I was able to reproduce this problem in the Contacts sample 
application.  If logout.jsp *doesn't* do a redirect, the problem occurs 
and the user stays logged in.  If it *does* a redirect, everything works 
and the user is logged out and prompted to login again.

I'm guessing the desired behavior is that session.invalidate() logs out 
the user, regardless of redirect or not.  I tried adding 
dispatcherREQUEST/dispatcher and dispatcherFORWARD/dispatcher to 
the Acegi Filter Chain Proxy, but no luck.

Still digging...
Matt
Matt Raible wrote:
FYI...
I just upgraded the sample app for Spring Live to 0.8.0 and I'm  
experiencing this same issue.  Invalidating the session does not 
logout  a user.  I'll dig into Acegi Security code later tonight and 
see if the  ContextHolder is still holding an Authentication object 
outside of the  session.  That seems to be what is happening.

Does my httpSessionContextIntegrationFilter need to explicitly say 
use  the session?  I tried setting allowSessionCreation to false 
and  true and neither seemed to have any effect.  Maybe my 
logout.jsp  needs to have outside of a secure URL?  I also deleted 
all my  filter-mappings except for the Acegi Security one.

Matt
On Mar 14, 2005, at 6:59 AM, Matt Raible wrote:
On Mar 12, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Ben Alex wrote:
Matt Raible wrote:
Here's a link to AppFuse's applicationContext-security.xml file -  
the  filters are specified in the first bean at the top.

http://tinyurl.com/6y4jd
Matt, did you get it working in the end?

Nope.
As the Contacts Sample is working, it points to configuration. I  
checked the URL above and couldn't see any issues with the filter  
configuration. Could another filter (SiteMesh?) be re-creating the  
HttpSession and conflicting with the session invalidation? Consider  
this:

1. HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter obtains Context from  
HttpSession and puts it in ContextHolder
2. Session invalidated during view
3. Some object/filter uses HttpServletRequest.getSession() or  
.getSession(true), which re-creates a new session
4. HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter obtains a session, and 
copies  ContextHolder Context into it
5. On next request, HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter finds 
Context  in the HttpSession

The above could explain the behaviour you're observing. Especially 
as  you can ContextHolder.setContext(null) during step 2 and it 
achieves  logout. I'd try commenting out all the other non-Acegi 
Security  filters and progressively re-adding them.

I commented out *all* the filters I have, except for the  
FilterChainProxy:

filter
filter-namesecurityFilter/filter-name
 
filter-classnet.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy/filter- 
class
init-param
param-nametargetClass/param-name
 
param-valuenet.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy/param-value
/init-param
/filter

filter-mapping
filter-namesecurityFilter/filter-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
/filter-mapping
Then I changed logout.jsp to remove any references to tag libraries 
or  JSP declarations:

%session.invalidate();%
a href=mainMenu.htmlmainMenu.html/a
The strange thing is I can click on the mainMenu.html link and I'll  
see the main menu w/o being logged in.  However, if I try to edit my  
profile (which uses request.getRemoteUser()), I get a NPE.  Here's 
my  filterChainProxy definition.

bean id=filterChainProxy  
class=net.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy
property name=filterInvocationDefinitionSource
value
CONVERT_URL_TO_LOWERCASE_BEFORE_COMPARISON
PATTERN_TYPE_APACHE_ANT
 / 
**=httpSessionContextIntegrationFilter,authenticationProcessingFilter,r 
emoteUserFilter,anonymousProcessingFilter,securityEnforcementFilter
/value
/property
/bean

Matt


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-14 Thread Matt Raible
On Mar 12, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Ben Alex wrote:
Matt Raible wrote:
Here's a link to AppFuse's applicationContext-security.xml file - the  
 filters are specified in the first bean at the top.

http://tinyurl.com/6y4jd
Matt, did you get it working in the end?
Nope.
As the Contacts Sample is working, it points to configuration. I  
checked the URL above and couldn't see any issues with the filter  
configuration. Could another filter (SiteMesh?) be re-creating the  
HttpSession and conflicting with the session invalidation? Consider  
this:

1. HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter obtains Context from  
HttpSession and puts it in ContextHolder
2. Session invalidated during view
3. Some object/filter uses HttpServletRequest.getSession() or  
.getSession(true), which re-creates a new session
4. HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter obtains a session, and copies  
ContextHolder Context into it
5. On next request, HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter finds Context  
in the HttpSession

The above could explain the behaviour you're observing. Especially as  
you can ContextHolder.setContext(null) during step 2 and it achieves  
logout. I'd try commenting out all the other non-Acegi Security  
filters and progressively re-adding them.
I commented out *all* the filters I have, except for the  
FilterChainProxy:

filter
filter-namesecurityFilter/filter-name
 
filter-classnet.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy/filter- 
class
init-param
param-nametargetClass/param-name
 
param-valuenet.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy/param-value
/init-param
/filter

filter-mapping
filter-namesecurityFilter/filter-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
/filter-mapping
Then I changed logout.jsp to remove any references to tag libraries or  
JSP declarations:

%session.invalidate();%
a href=mainMenu.htmlmainMenu.html/a
The strange thing is I can click on the mainMenu.html link and I'll see  
the main menu w/o being logged in.  However, if I try to edit my  
profile (which uses request.getRemoteUser()), I get a NPE.  Here's my  
filterChainProxy definition.

bean id=filterChainProxy  
class=net.sf.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy
property name=filterInvocationDefinitionSource
value
CONVERT_URL_TO_LOWERCASE_BEFORE_COMPARISON
PATTERN_TYPE_APACHE_ANT
 
/ 
**=httpSessionContextIntegrationFilter,authenticationProcessingFilter,re 
moteUserFilter,anonymousProcessingFilter,securityEnforcementFilter
/value
/property
/bean

Matt

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
Ben Alex wrote:
Andreas Brenk wrote:
You could use a HttpSessionListener to keep the coupling to Acegi 
Security separate from your controller.

See http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=1106 for an 
earlier discussion.

Perhaps this should be mentioned in the upgrade readme.
Regards,
Andreas
Matt Raible wrote:
With Acegi Security 0.7.0, I was able to use session.invalidate() to 
logout a user - much like I do when using container-managed 
authentication.  However, with 0.8.0, I've found that I have to use 
ContextHolder.setContext(null).  Is there anyway to change back to 
the old behavior so I don't have any Acegi Security-specific code in 
my app - so users can easily switch back to CMA (non-Acegi Security 
based) if they want?


Hi Matt
Which container are you using? What does DEBUG-level logging show for 
HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter? It seems to work OK for me in 
Tomcat 5.5 with the Contacts Sample application's logout.jsp.
For some reason, calling session.invalidate() (in a filter or in a JSP) 
doesn't seem to help get rid of any Acegi authentication information.  
Adding ContextHolder.setContext(null) in a filter that's mapped to 
logout.jsp seems to be the only thing that works for me.  Here's my 
LoginFilter that gets hit:

http://static.raibledesigns.com/downloads/appfuse/api/org/appfuse/webapp/filter/LoginFilter.java.html
And my console is printing out:
[appfuse] DEBUG [http-8080-Processor3] LoginFilter.doFilter(72) | 
logging out 'mraible'

Matt
Matt

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
On Mar 11, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Ben Alex wrote:
Matt Raible wrote:
For some reason, calling session.invalidate() (in a filter or in a  
JSP) doesn't seem to help get rid of any Acegi authentication  
information.  Adding ContextHolder.setContext(null) in a filter  
that's mapped to logout.jsp seems to be the only thing that works for  
me.  Here's my LoginFilter that gets hit:

http://static.raibledesigns.com/downloads/appfuse/api/org/appfuse/ 
webapp/filter/LoginFilter.java.html

And my console is printing out:
[appfuse] DEBUG [http-8080-Processor3] LoginFilter.doFilter(72) |  
logging out 'mraible'

Sorry Matt, what container was it again? Does the 0.8.0 official  
Contacts Sample app work properly in the same container (ie its logout  
page works)? I'm wondering if the filter ordering is correct, as it  
changed in version 0.8.0. It would be good to get to the bottom of  
this
Tomcat 5.5.7 on Windows XP and JDK 1.4.2.  Yes, the Contacts sample app  
from CVS works when I logout.  I've used both the FilterChainProxy and  
the specify-each-filter in web.xml methods and it happens with both.   
It could be a filter ordering problem, but I'm pretty sure the order I  
have is needed to make other things work.

Matt
Cheers
Ben
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real  
users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
On Mar 11, 2005, at 6:28 AM, Matt Raible wrote:
On Mar 11, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Ben Alex wrote:
Matt Raible wrote:
For some reason, calling session.invalidate() (in a filter or in a  
JSP) doesn't seem to help get rid of any Acegi authentication  
information.  Adding ContextHolder.setContext(null) in a filter  
that's mapped to logout.jsp seems to be the only thing that works  
for me.  Here's my LoginFilter that gets hit:

http://static.raibledesigns.com/downloads/appfuse/api/org/appfuse/ 
webapp/filter/LoginFilter.java.html

And my console is printing out:
[appfuse] DEBUG [http-8080-Processor3] LoginFilter.doFilter(72) |  
logging out 'mraible'

Sorry Matt, what container was it again? Does the 0.8.0 official  
Contacts Sample app work properly in the same container (ie its  
logout page works)? I'm wondering if the filter ordering is correct,  
as it changed in version 0.8.0. It would be good to get to the bottom  
of this
Tomcat 5.5.7 on Windows XP and JDK 1.4.2.  Yes, the Contacts sample  
app from CVS works when I logout.  I've used both the FilterChainProxy  
and the specify-each-filter in web.xml methods and it happens with  
both.  It could be a filter ordering problem, but I'm pretty sure the  
order I have is needed to make other things work.
Here's a link to AppFuse's applicationContext-security.xml file - the  
filters are specified in the first bean at the top.

http://tinyurl.com/6y4jd
Matt

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-10 Thread Andreas Brenk
You could use a HttpSessionListener to keep the coupling to Acegi 
Security separate from your controller.

See http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=1106 for an earlier 
discussion.

Perhaps this should be mentioned in the upgrade readme.
Regards,
Andreas
Matt Raible wrote:
With Acegi Security 0.7.0, I was able to use session.invalidate() to 
logout a user - much like I do when using container-managed 
authentication.  However, with 0.8.0, I've found that I have to use 
ContextHolder.setContext(null).  Is there anyway to change back to the 
old behavior so I don't have any Acegi Security-specific code in my app 
- so users can easily switch back to CMA (non-Acegi Security based) if 
they want?

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer


Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-10 Thread Ben Alex
Matt Raible wrote:
Ben Alex wrote:
It seems to work OK for me in Tomcat 5.5 with the Contacts Sample 
application's logout.jsp.

I tried building/deploying the contacts WAR with maven (according to 
the Building with Maven instructions) - there is no web.xml included 
in the WAR file.

Matt

You need to use multiwar:multiwar from samples/contacts to build the 
Contacts sample.

Or from docs using multiproject:artifact.
I just checked the 0.8.0 official release ZIP (build with 
multiproject:artifact from docs) and it includes 
acegi-security-sample-contacts-filter.war which does include web.xml.

Ben
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer