I've read the draft and think it's a valuable addition for the ACME
ecosystem.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 9:11 AM Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:

> I have read the draft, and it seems well thought through.  Especially if
> there is implementor interest, this seems like a sane thing for the WG to
> adopt.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:53 PM Carl Wallace <c...@redhoundsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I’ve read the draft and support its adoption.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Acme <acme-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Deb Cooley <
>> debcool...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM
>> *To: *IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
>> *Cc: *<acme-cha...@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: *[Acme] Call for adoption for draft-bweeks-acme-device-attest
>>
>>
>>
>> This will be a three week call for adoption ending on 6 Dec. (because of
>> holidays in the US).   Please speak up either for or against adopting this
>> draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deb and Yoav.
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to