Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03
Really OT... You are correct, But, it’s quite reasonable for a chair to check with the WG to see if folks think a doc is ready for WGLC.I’ve done that for 12+ years and it’s actually not unusual to get very valid concerns raised at this point in the process. It keeps docs from having to go through multiple WGLCs. I find that approach easier to deal with in the case that I’m the shepherd as often WGLC is a good time to start the write up and I find it very annoying and not a good use of my time. Regards, Mary On Monday, July 23, 2018, Richard Barnes wrote: > As a point of order, I'm pretty sure the chairs don't need consensus to > move to WGLC, they can just do it. > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:53 PM Salz, Rich ietf.org> wrote: > >> For context: this is draft-ietf-acme-star-03 as mentioned in the Subject >> but not the body. >> >> >> >> *From: *Rich Salz >> *Date: *Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:50 PM >> *To: *"Salz, Rich" , "acme@ietf.org" < >> acme@ietf.org> >> *Subject: *Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 >> >> >> >> Please reply by Wednesday, a week. >> >> >> >> *From: *"Salz, Rich" >> *Date: *Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:49 PM >> *To: *"acme@ietf.org" >> *Subject: *[Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 >> >> >> >> At London, the WG decided to have draft-ietf-acme-star to WGLC, but the >> chairs dropped the ball. >> >> >> >> Does anyone object to doing this? We would particularly like to also >> know if you have read the document. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> ___ >> Acme mailing list >> Acme@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03
As a point of order, I'm pretty sure the chairs don't need consensus to move to WGLC, they can just do it. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:53 PM Salz, Rich wrote: > For context: this is draft-ietf-acme-star-03 as mentioned in the Subject > but not the body. > > > > *From: *Rich Salz > *Date: *Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:50 PM > *To: *"Salz, Rich" , "acme@ietf.org" < > acme@ietf.org> > *Subject: *Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 > > > > Please reply by Wednesday, a week. > > > > *From: *"Salz, Rich" > *Date: *Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:49 PM > *To: *"acme@ietf.org" > *Subject: *[Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 > > > > At London, the WG decided to have draft-ietf-acme-star to WGLC, but the > chairs dropped the ball. > > > > Does anyone object to doing this? We would particularly like to also know > if you have read the document. > > > > Thanks. > ___ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03
For context: this is draft-ietf-acme-star-03 as mentioned in the Subject but not the body. From: Rich Salz Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:50 PM To: "Salz, Rich" , "acme@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 Please reply by Wednesday, a week. From: "Salz, Rich" Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:49 PM To: "acme@ietf.org" Subject: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 At London, the WG decided to have draft-ietf-acme-star to WGLC, but the chairs dropped the ball. Does anyone object to doing this? We would particularly like to also know if you have read the document. Thanks. ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03
Please reply by Wednesday, a week. From: "Salz, Rich" Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:49 PM To: "acme@ietf.org" Subject: [Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03 At London, the WG decided to have draft-ietf-acme-star to WGLC, but the chairs dropped the ball. Does anyone object to doing this? We would particularly like to also know if you have read the document. Thanks. ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
[Acme] Consensus on WGLC for draft-ietf-acme-star-03
At London, the WG decided to have draft-ietf-acme-star to WGLC, but the chairs dropped the ball. Does anyone object to doing this? We would particularly like to also know if you have read the document. Thanks. ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
