[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC||rui.zh...@intel.com Assignee|acpi_power-other@kernel-bug |r...@rjwysocki.net |s.osdl.org | --- Comment #10 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) --- (In reply to Sam Edwards from comment #7) > This issue has now made it into the 5.14.0 release There are several improvements after commit 7e4fdeafa61f, and they're all shipped before 5.14. 6381195ad7d0 ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power resources 9b7ff25d129d ACPI: power: Refine turning off unused power resources 29038ae2ae56 Revert "Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization"" 5db91e9cb5b3 Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization" 7e4fdeafa61f ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally So do you mean that the problem still occurs in 5.14 final release? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 --- Comment #9 from Gino Badouri (mas...@gmail.com) --- Hello, A small update. I've replaced the SSSTC nvme ssd with another one from WD and the same thing happens. So for the record, the first (internal) one is now from WD and the second one is the Samsung EVO 970 ssd. So it seems the nvme ssd type/brand is not to blame here. It just doesn't initialize properly when it's in the first slot regardless of the brand. A rather large regression.. If you don't have a second ssd installed, you could try to move it to the optional slot which is right above it. Or optionally enable the Intel VMD Rapid Storage chipset (you don't have to create a RAID set), but that will require you to reinstall Windows with the floppy driver from Intel. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 Gino Badouri (mas...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mas...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Gino Badouri (mas...@gmail.com) --- Hi there, I'm also affected by this bug. Using kernel 5.11 my NVME drive was detected properly. Now using 5.13 or 5.14 I'm getting: pci :02:00.0: CLS mismatch (64 != 1020), using 64 bytes nvme :02:00.0: can't change power state from D3hot to D0 (config space inaccessible) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 Sam Edwards (cfswo...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version|5.13.9 |5.14.0 --- Comment #7 from Sam Edwards (cfswo...@gmail.com) --- This issue has now made it into the 5.14.0 release -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 Antonio (antde...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antde...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Antonio (antde...@gmail.com) --- I don't know if there is a correlation with this problem, but with the kernel 5.13.x my notebook (asus) sometimes does not perform turn off and I have to do it manually. Also, while it is locked after last kernel log message, the notebook gets overheats a lot. I will try to recompile the kernel without this patch to check if it resolve. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 --- Comment #5 from Sam Edwards (cfswo...@gmail.com) --- The improper device poweroff DOES happen with 7e4fdeafa61f, but NOT with 4b9ee772eaa8 (7e4fdea's parent commit). So it's a regression with 7e4fdeafa61f, although the resource_in_use=0 is not new. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 Bjorn Helgaas (bj...@helgaas.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|No |Yes -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 --- Comment #4 from Sam Edwards (cfswo...@gmail.com) --- I do know that this worked fine on a 5.12.x kernel and the issue appeared when I attempted to boot 5.13.0. I can see if 7e4fdeafa61f itself introduced the problem (by trying a boot with 7e4fdeafa61f and 7e4fdeafa61f^) if desired. I'll spend some time configuring a more minimalist kernel that I can kexec to test patches and do any additional debug steps. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 --- Comment #3 from Sam Edwards (cfswo...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 298281 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298281=edit dmesg output up to when NVMe driver is running (with acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources disabled) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035 --- Comment #2 from Sam Edwards (cfswo...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 298279 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298279=edit acpidump -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 214035] acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() may take down necessary hardware
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214035
Bjorn Helgaas (bj...@helgaas.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bj...@helgaas.com,
||r...@rjwysocki.net
--- Comment #1 from Bjorn Helgaas (bj...@helgaas.com) ---
https://git.kernel.org/linus/7e4fdeafa61f ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power
resources unconditionally")
Is this a regression caused by 7e4fdeafa61f, i.e., did this device work
correctly in v5.12 and broke in v5.13? If so, this is a much higher priority
problem.
Could you attach the complete dmesg log and the output of acpidump?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
