[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 3022] S3: high power consumption - Thinkpad T40/T41

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Attachment #7899 is|0   |1
   obsolete||



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 02:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=8219)
 --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=8219&action=view)
patch with a new whitelist

Well, first of all sorry for the delay. I have a new job and I have no more any
laptop affected by the bug, so I am not able to work further on this bug. I
attach the patch with the revised whitelist (by Volker Braun). This is the
opinion by Benjamin Herrenscmidt (the radeonfb kernel maintainer): 

"I think the whitelist should contain the actual PM mode and reinit
function if any so that we can fit the Samsung special case in there
too.

Appart from that, it looks good."

So, if you are able to make this required change, you can submit the patch to
him ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) for vanilla kernel inclusion (the patch is
already properly formatted, you need only to write a description to make it
perfect). 

I apologize again for the delay, may be that you will not be able to commit it
for 2.6.17 and this will require to adapt slightly the patch (I can help with
this aspect). Contact me for any other issue (but consider that I have no more
the hardware where to test the patch).

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 3022] S3: high power consumption - Thinkpad T40/T41

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Attachment #7899 is|0   |1
   obsolete||



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 02:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=8219)
 --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=8219&action=view)
patch with a new whitelist

Well, first of all sorry for the delay. I have a new job and I have no more any
laptop affected by the bug, so I am not able to work further on this bug. I
attach the patch with the revised whitelist (by Volker Braun). This is the
opinion by Benjamin Herrenscmidt (the radeonfb kernel maintainer): 

"I think the whitelist should contain the actual PM mode and reinit
function if any so that we can fit the Samsung special case in there
too.

Appart from that, it looks good."

So, if you are able to make this required change, you can submit the patch to
him ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) for vanilla kernel inclusion (the patch is
already properly formatted, you need only to write a description to make it
perfect). 

I apologize again for the delay, may be that you will not be able to commit it
for 2.6.17 and this will require to adapt slightly the patch (I can help with
this aspect). Contact me for any other issue (but consider that I have no more
the hardware where to test the patch).

--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 02:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=8220)
 --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=8220&action=view)
patch with a new whitelist

Well, first of all sorry for the delay. I have a new job and I have no more any
laptop affected by the bug, so I am not able to work further on this bug. I
attach the patch with the revised whitelist (by Volker Braun). This is the
opinion by Benjamin Herrenscmidt (the radeonfb kernel maintainer): 

"I think the whitelist should contain the actual PM mode and reinit
function if any so that we can fit the Samsung special case in there
too.

Appart from that, it looks good."

So, if you are able to make this required change, you can submit the patch to
him ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) for vanilla kernel inclusion (the patch is
already properly formatted, you need only to write a description to make it
perfect and to put the signed off: Antti Andreimann, Thomas de Grenier de
Latour, Volker Braun and myself; you can find the relevant email addresses
inside this bug comments). 

I apologize again for the delay, may be that you will not be able to commit it
for 2.6.17 and this will require to adapt slightly the patch (I can help with
this aspect). Contact me for any other issue (but consider that I have no more
the hardware where to test the patch).

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5534] No thermal events until acpi -t - HP nx6125

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5534





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 03:35 ---
Is there a DSDT patch for the F0E Bios ? I could only find patches for the older
F0D version. Is it necessary to patch the Bios with a new DSDT or is it enough
to apply the acpi patch to the kernel ?
Did anyone succeeed in using suspend to ram with the acpi patch ?

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5534] No thermal events until acpi -t - HP nx6125

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5534





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 05:26 ---
Yes, I'm still using the second patch from Peter, without patching the DSDT and
suspend works like a charm, no problems with the fan...

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5534] No thermal events until acpi -t - HP nx6125

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5534





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 07:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=8221)
 --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=8221&action=view)
DSDT for F.0E nx6125 bios with _ON method patch

There isn't a patch at acpi4linux for the F.0E bios yet. I found some
instructions for extracting the current DSDT and made the canges to the _ON
method from comment #57. I also changed line 6550 to fix an error (iasl version
20060512), by swapping in a value from the F.0D custom DSDT. In SUSE you can
add the DSDT to initrd, so you don't need to recompile the kernel.

This appears to fix a problem enabling the fan, which I see even with an
unpatched kernel while running a script to poll thermal events. If you don't
see a problem with turning on the fan, then I guess you don't need the patched
DSDT.

I haven't tried suspend, so it may or may not work, and the patch does not
include other fixes from the F.0D custom version. As soon as a patch is
available for F.0E at acpi4linux I would suggest using that, but here's the
DSDT I'm using if anyone wants to give it a try.

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5534] No thermal events until acpi -t - HP nx6125

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5534





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 09:02 ---
Please ignore the patched DSDT in my previous comment. I've doubled checked my
BIOS version and it's F.0D not F.0E. Apologies for silly mistake and any
inconvenience this may have caused.
The changes in comment #57 do appear to fix the fan problem though, and the
checks in the _ON method are still there in F.0E. If you see acpi warnings about
being unable to turn on the fan with F.0E, it's worth trying the changes.

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5534] No thermal events until acpi -t - HP nx6125

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5534





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 11:39 ---
Thought I'd add my two cents on the patch mentioned in comment #112. Been using
it for a week or so now and have found it to be rock solid. My fans cycle
perfectly, turning on and off as expected, with the correct hysteresis. This is
highly reproducible and independent of earlier usage. I don't use suspend, so I
cannot comment on that.

BIOS F.0D; Distro: Debian; Kernel: 2.6.16.13

My DSDT (F.0D) is unpatched.

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla


[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6612] Resume from S3: [PATCH] Fix poweroff after resume according to ACPI 3.0 specs (P62)

2006-05-28 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6612





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-28 19:22 ---
Yes, I agree acpi_set_register() is the right way.

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla