RE: [ActiveDir] Restoring System State

2002-05-26 Thread Rick Kingslan

Saeed,

I'm left somewhat confused as to why someone would tell you that the
only way to have a backup system for Exchange was to have it installed
on a backup domain controller (to somewhat reword what I believe you
said).

Fact is, as I'm sure you're very aware Exchange 2000 does not have a
directory service any longer and relies on Windows 2000 for this.
Exchange, in many cases, is installed on a member server.  The critical
restore requirement for Exchange is the configuration and
re-installation of the mail stores and storage groups.  Since the advent
of E2K, the Exchange server is more of a specialized database server
acting as a mail distribution system.  A lot of the intelligence is on
the domain controller.

This is not to say that backing up a E2K system is not important,
because it is - it's more an issue of data than of directory, IMHO.
This is why clustering is the normal reliabilty solution with Exchange,
where another DC is the reliability solution with Domain Controllers.

Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
  Microsoft Certified Trainer
  MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
  
"Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic."
  ---  Arthur C. Clarke



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saeed Ahmed
> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Restoring System State
> 
> 
> we do have additional DC but the problems is that we
> have one MS Exchange 2k, and i want to have a backup
> of it. what i understand is that to have a backup of
> exchange i have to have a W2K DC. if there is some
> other way of having backup of exchange 2k please let
> me know.
> 
> regards
> saeed
> 
> --- Tony Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Saeed
> > 
> > Would it not be better to simply configure your
> > second server as a second Active Directory domain
> > controller in the same domain?  This way you would
> > have some redundancy if one of them fails.
> > 
> > Or is the problem that the original machine is no
> > longer available?
> > 
> > Usually you would only need to restore from backup
> > to different hardware if the original machine is
> > completely irrecoverable, or if the two machines are
> > not connected by a sufficiently fast network link
> > for replication to be feasible.  If this is the case
> > for you then have a look at the following Microsoft
> > KB article:
> > 
> >
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q263532
> > 
> > Tony
> > www.activedir.org
> > 
> > 
> > -- Original Message
> > --
> > From: Saeed Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 05:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > i have two servers with different hardware
> > configuration. one server is w2k active directory
> > server. i want to make a backup of this on other
> > server. when i restore  system state on other server
> > it gives many errors, first being video error
> > followed
> > by blue screen etc.
> > is there any way that i only restore 'active
> > directory' from system state backup
> > 
> > regards
> > saeed
> > 
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> > http://launch.yahoo.com
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive:
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup 
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



Re: [ActiveDir] Very OT...Sun

2002-05-26 Thread Nah Idee

Forget NIS+. Your best bet is a Sun book from any book store. It also
depends on what you want to do with the Ultra re DNS.
- Original Message -
From: "Marvin Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ActiveDir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 3:37 PM
Subject: [ActiveDir] Very OT...Sun


> Can anyone point me to some online assistance for learning Sun? I have an
> Ultra 10 that I'm trying to setup on my W2K network and I'm having trouble
> deciding on either DNS or NIS+. Acutally I installed it with DNS and I can
> ping my W2K servers fine, I'm just not sure where to go now.
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Sorry for the change of topic...
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



[ActiveDir] Very OT...Sun

2002-05-26 Thread Marvin Cummings

Can anyone point me to some online assistance for learning Sun? I have an
Ultra 10 that I'm trying to setup on my W2K network and I'm having trouble
deciding on either DNS or NIS+. Acutally I installed it with DNS and I can
ping my W2K servers fine, I'm just not sure where to go now.
Any help is appreciated.

Sorry for the change of topic...

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



[ActiveDir] IE6 Browser

2002-05-26 Thread Eric Yeoh



Hi,
 
I just upgraded my my win2k Server's IE 5.5 to 
IE6 and I have this problem where Iwheneever I try to view any of the Win2k 
Resource Kit's Online Books I am told that my browser is an old version and told 
to upgrade.
 
 
Same problem with my Win2k Pro clients trying to 
read the Support Tool's documentation.
 
Any ideas?
 
 
ERIC