RE: [ActiveDir] two ops
You are using a E-Mail or Reply-to with just cyrus without and @maildomain - seems so that some mailsystems of the other companies add their own domains ;-) Gruesse - Sincerely, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cyrus Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] two ops Importance: High no i'm not Rutherford, Robert writes: Are you using outlook? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 July 2004 10:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] two ops yeah, also not sure whats going on, honestly dont know where 2 begin, help is appreciated. rgds cyrus Thommes, Michael M. writes: Cyrus, your email address is showing up using our mail server too! Maybe some weird email configuration using localhost? Mike Thommes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 7/20/2004 4:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] two ops realy I have no idea how musicrights.co.uk got tagged on my mail, something interesting to look into. thanks for the help. rgds cyrus Rutherford, Robert writes: 1) Just go into the boot.ini on the root of your boot partition and delete the reference to your old OS. If you are unsure then post the contents here and I'll tell you which 1. 2) How/Why are you using the domain name musicrights.co.uk? My company owns that domain name and we do not use it in any mail system. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 July 2004 06:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] two ops greetings, I have formatted the server and re-install window server ops, now every time the server starts or restarts, i'm always propmpted to select which Window Server the system will use. I have only one, how can I remove this prompt to select which window server the system will use. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all communications for potential viruses, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by this e-mail and the information it contains. It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Any e-mails sent to and from the MCPS-PRS Alliance servers may be monitored for quality control and other purposes. The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited is a limited company registered in England under company number 03444246 whose registered office is at c/o 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Unless you are the intended recipient, you should not copy this e-mail for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The MCPS-PRS Alliance is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Whilst the MCPS-PRS Alliance monitors all
RE: [ActiveDir] NTP server
Title: [ActiveDir] NTP server Hi Russ, Yes youll have to configure the PDC-Emulator of the Rootdomain only and reconfigure machines that were configured otherwise to use the default domain behaviour to receive the time again. Heres the domain behaviour in a short NG answer I wrote recently: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=uHjA0eWaEHA.2516%40TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl Youll be able to find Stratum 1 Timeserver to use on this website: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/clock1a.html And what I forgot to mention in the NG: Sometimes Ive seen that a DC which was configured to use another behaviour than NT5DS did not accept the changes of the registry or w32tm command correctly to adjust to the domain behaviour. If this is happening you are able to deregister and register the timeservice again using w32tm /deregister and w32tm /register. Gruesse - Sincerely, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 1:26 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTP server So your firewall lets only the PDC emulator go out the NTP port, and all devices including things like Switches and Routers all sync with the PDC emulator as well? If we have an empty root domain, could we use the PDC emulator in that domain and have all our child domain servers and all other objects go there just as well? -Original Message- From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTP server I use my PDC. It syncs with the government. All you rclients automatically talk to the PDC unless you told em not to. --Brian -Original Message- From: Rimmerman, Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 7/22/2004 7:24 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: Subject: [ActiveDir] NTP server Where does everyone have their NTP services come from? We are getting rid of our current firewall which has NTP on it and everything is pointed to it for NTP services. Our new firewall won't have NTP built in, so we are going to have to set up an internal NTP server for all our internal hosts to sync to. Do we put it in the DMZ or the internal network? Or does it matter? Do we just install NTP on an existing Win2k server in our DMZ? What is everyone else doing for NTP? Thanks ~~ This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information of the Cooper Cameron Corporation and its operating Divisions and may be confidential or privileged. This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only by the addressee. If you have received this message in error please delete it, together with any attachments, from your system. ~~ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ ~~This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary informationof the Cooper Cameron Corporation and its operating Divisionsand may be confidential or privileged.This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used onlyby the addressee. If you have received this message in error pleasedelete it, together with any attachments, from your system.~~
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] NTFS Read-only Status
first of all - are you sure you're a) talking about a volume (e.g. physical or logical disk?) that you want to mount on one box, or b) are you talking about a share with data, which you want to make available to others, but they should only read from it? if a), this is simply related to ACLs (Access Control Lists = Permissions, set via the Security tab) at the root of the drive - mounting the drive itself doesn't allow to configure it for read-only. But you can remove the "Everyone - Full Control" ACLs and replace them with something you'd preferr (e.g. Administrators - Full Control and Users - Read Only). XCACLS is one of those magic programs, which can do this for you. if b), you simply set read-access at the share-level before you mount the share for your users.This is now default in Win2003, but prior versions grant Everyone Fullcontrol at the share-level. /Guido From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. SmithSent: Friday, July 23, 2004 9:44 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] NTFS Read-only Status I've tried this on other groups, and it is not A/D related. But you guys know so much... I want a way to mount an NTFS volume read-only. I want a magic command like "mode e: read-only". :-) It is clear to me (and I've found references) that this is supported with NTFS (Windows XP and above), but I cannot figure out/find out how to set it. Any ideas? Thanks, Michael
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] NTFS Read-only Status
Im actually talking about c) a logical disk visible on multiple servers. (Its an HP MSA-1000 SAN with a particular logical disk configured via SSP to be viewable on all SAN servers for shared storage. I cannot find anything about this on HPs website. Ill burn a call to support tomorrow I guess.) I only want one of the multiple servers to have write access to the disk. There are a whole slew of issues I can imagine otherwise. Thanks for your reply, Michael From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] NTFS Read-only Status first of all - are you sure you're a) talking about a volume (e.g. physical or logical disk?) that you want to mount on one box, or b) are you talking about a share with data, which you want to make available to others, but they should only read from it? if a), this is simply related to ACLs (Access Control Lists = Permissions, set via the Security tab) at the root of the drive - mounting the drive itself doesn't allow to configure it for read-only. But you can remove the Everyone - Full Control ACLs and replace them with something you'd preferr (e.g. Administrators - Full Control and Users - Read Only). XCACLS is one of those magic programs, which can do this for you. if b), you simply set read-access at the share-level before you mount the share for your users.This is now default in Win2003, but prior versions grant Everyone Fullcontrol at the share-level. /Guido From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 9:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] NTFS Read-only Status I've tried this on other groups, and it is not A/D related. But you guys know so much... I want a way to mount an NTFS volume read-only. I want a magic command like mode e: read-only. :-) It is clear to me (and I've found references) that this is supported with NTFS (Windows XP and above), but I cannot figure out/find out how to set it. Any ideas? Thanks, Michael
