date:20060217

RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)

2006-02-17 Thread Joe Pochedley

Jorge,

I never mind someone knowledgeable answering the question!  I haven't
had much time to look at what's new in R2 yet, and therefore wanted to
check...  Glad I asked.

I've actually been thinking of finally upgrading our AD controllers to
2003, but was holding off for R2...  I've waited this long, might as
well do it all in one fell swoop.  (Not like I won't be doing more
reading on the new tools in R2 before I run some tests and actually do
the upgrade, but at least this is one question I won't be stumbling to
find an answer for!)

Thanks again.

JoeP

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 4:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2
and W2K3 SP1)

Hope you don't mind me answering this...

The same rules apply when going from w2k to w2k3r2 compared to w2k->w2k3

Make sure you run ADPREP from DISK 2!!! Using that ADPREP version
upgrades the schema directly to version 31 (R2)

If you run the ADPREP version from DISK1 you will get schema version 30,
which is just W2K3 without R2

See:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/20/110.aspx

Jorge

>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe 
>>>Pochedley
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 22:19
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: 
>>>[ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)
>>>
>>>Joe, 
>>>
>>>
>>>Got my order of your book from Amazon the other day (and yes 
>>>I ordered from the link on your web page).  It's sitting on 
>>>my dining room table just waiting to be read.  Hopefully 
>>>I'll have some time to start reading this weekend...
>>>
>>>
>>>Now, to the real question (which may actually be answered in 
>>>the book, but I digress).  Are there any caveats in moving 
>>>direct from an AD 2000 domain to a AD2003/R2 schema with the 
>>>new updates directly?  Or does there need to be a stepped 
>>>approach?  (Yes, it does sound like a silly question, but 
>>>always better safe than sorry.) 
>>>
>>>
>>>Joe Pochedley
>>>A computer terminal is not some clunky old television with a 
>>>typewriter in front of it. It is an interface where the mind 
>>>and body can connect with the universe and move bits of it 
>>>about. -Douglas Adams 
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:49 PM
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1
>>>
>>>A couple of reasons
>>>
>>>1. As people keep buying the product they will buy the SP1 
>>>version of it which has significant updates for security, 
>>>etc. Best to get the old stuff out of the channels.
>>>
>>>2. Gets several feature packs out there with the media so people 
>>> a. Know about it at all, lots of folks don't know about 
>>>the RTW stuff
>>> b. Feel that it is fully supported (this was an issue 
>>>with acceptance of ADAM)
>>>
>>>Even if you don't want any of the feature packs, you want R2 
>>>or at least ADAM SP1 for the AD Tool updates. This and more 
>>>is discussed in the book in the signature below[1]. ;o)
>>>
>>>Don't upgrade to R2 because you think it is a new OS. 
>>>Upgrade if you need the feature packs (or tools as mentioned 
>>>above). I do recommend slapping the schema in when you can, 
>>>at some point, you will most likely need to apply it so this 
>>>gives you good head start for getting it in there if you 
>>>don't need it right away.
>>>
>>>
>>>   joe 
>>>
>>>[1] BTW, anyone who has had a chance to go through the book 
>>>I wouldn't mind hearing reviews (or better reading them on 
>>>Amazon) and/or thoughts on it. I am getting very positive 
>>>feedback so far on the updates and folks are really enjoying 
>>>it. Worst comment is that ADAM deserves more room and I 
>>>completely agree, ADAM is a book unto itself that I am 
>>>making up notes on now for including a whole section on 
>>>Microsoft dorking with the name. If you know an MS Marketing 
>>>person, please kick them in the knee for me. Tell them they 
>>>can respond to me at my email address. ADAM was a great 
>>>name, you could say, this is a case for ADAM madam! Oh no, 
>>>now you have to say something stupid like we need MSADLDS or 
>>>ADLDS or even LDS. At least they could have something fun 
>>>and called it Lightweight Service Directory. ADLDS and LDS 
>>>are not fun. ADAM is fun.
>>>Microsoft, stop being a stick in the mud you boobs.
>>>Ah, back to work. Maybe post more over the weekend but 
>>>probably not, too busy.
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - 
>>>http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
>>> 
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>>>Salandra, Justin A.
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:26 PM
>>>To: ActiveDir@ma

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Alexander Suhovey

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Bahta, Nathaniel V Contractor NASIC/SCNA
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:04 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

[..]
> Microsoft does not declare the differences 
> between windows 2003 sp1 and windows 2003 r2 disk 

>From R2 FAQ (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/R2/R2FAQ.mspx):
Q. Why does Windows Server 2003 R2 require two CDs for installation?  
A. Windows Server 2003 with SP1-a requirement for Windows Server 2003 R2-is
on CD 1. CD 2 includes the Windows Server 2003 R2 features.
 
> 1.  It seems that R2 is no more than a couple feature disks, 
> no kernel changes from R2 to SP1. 

Indeed. But no less either. Same kernel does not mean that it is just an
extra CD with some junk.

--Al


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] HP Insight Manger Question

2006-02-17 Thread Medeiros, Jose









J.. No, I wouldn’t expect you to know this, but I am sure that
HP also uses SIM in its data centers. I just thought I would ask.

 

Jose J

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006
1:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HP
Insight Manger Question 



 

Hello Jose - "and since we have several HP employees on this list" - so I guess you're also assuming I know everything about
printers ;-)

 

I have no clue if Insight Manager has
this function, but I'll try to find out.

 

/Guido

 

P.S.: if I get the answer, you'll owe me
a question on Intel procs :-)

 







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006
23:42
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] HP Insight
Manger Question 

Greetings, 

 

I realize that this is off topic, however I need to put
together a report using Insight Manager and since we have several HP employees
on this list, I was wondering if Insight Manger has the capability of just
giving me a report listing only the CPU temperature of each system that I am
managing rather then a full report?  

 

Sincerely,

Jose
Medeiros
Intel Corporation
MCP+I, MCSE, NT4 MCT
408-765-0437 Direct
408-449-6621 Cell

RE: [ActiveDir] HP Insight Manger Question

2006-02-17 Thread Medeiros, Jose

Hi Alexander, 

Thank you for taking the time to reply, I ran a sample report and your
right I did not see an option for CPU temp using HP SIM. However I do
know that the Proliant server MIB collects this information, as I was
able to view this up until version 4.9 of Compaq Insight Manager
(Win32).

Sincerely, 

Jose Medeiros



 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander
Suhovey
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:10 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HP Insight Manger Question 

Well, I'm not an HP employee but... 
AFAIK sensors data such as temperature or fan speeds are not collected
by
Data Collect jobs so they are not in SIM database. You can check that by
querying CIM_Sensors table in your Insight_ SQL database. Additional
information on this topic can also be found on HP ITRC forum. Try this
search:
http://www5.itrc.hp.com/service/james/search.do?todo=search&searchtext=i
nsig
ht+manager+temperature&from=forums&origin=0&wpa=forums1.itrc.hp.com%3A80
&sea
rchcategory=ALL&hpl=1&searchcriteria=allwords&rn=25&source=7000&presort=
rank
&chkServStor=on&esc=support.itrc.hp.com&admit=552267591+1140186464652+28
3534
75

As far as reporting is concerned, can't say about previous versions but
in
SIM 5.0 reports are quite customizable. You can have for example a
report on
sensors for several servers. You will not have actual temps or rpms in
this
report though, just a status.

--Al


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Medeiros, Jose
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:42 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: [ActiveDir] HP Insight Manger Question 
> 
> Greetings, 
> 
>  
> 
> I realize that this is off topic, however I need to put 
> together a report using Insight Manager and since we have 
> several HP employees on this list, I was wondering if Insight 
> Manger has the capability of just giving me a report listing 
> only the CPU temperature of each system that I am managing 
> rather then a full report?  
> 
>  
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Jose Medeiros
> Intel Corporation
> MCP+I, MCSE, NT4 MCT
> 408-765-0437 Direct
> 408-449-6621 Cell
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)

2006-02-17 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de

Hope you don't mind me answering this...

The same rules apply when going from w2k to w2k3r2 compared to w2k->w2k3

Make sure you run ADPREP from DISK 2!!! Using that ADPREP version
upgrades the schema directly to version 31 (R2)

If you run the ADPREP version from DISK1 you will get schema version 30,
which is just W2K3 without R2

See:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/20/110.aspx

Jorge

>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe 
>>>Pochedley
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 22:19
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: 
>>>[ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)
>>>
>>>Joe, 
>>>
>>>
>>>Got my order of your book from Amazon the other day (and yes 
>>>I ordered from the link on your web page).  It's sitting on 
>>>my dining room table just waiting to be read.  Hopefully 
>>>I'll have some time to start reading this weekend...
>>>
>>>
>>>Now, to the real question (which may actually be answered in 
>>>the book, but I digress).  Are there any caveats in moving 
>>>direct from an AD 2000 domain to a AD2003/R2 schema with the 
>>>new updates directly?  Or does there need to be a stepped 
>>>approach?  (Yes, it does sound like a silly question, but 
>>>always better safe than sorry.) 
>>>
>>>
>>>Joe Pochedley
>>>A computer terminal is not some clunky old television with a 
>>>typewriter in front of it. It is an interface where the mind 
>>>and body can connect with the universe and move bits of it 
>>>about. -Douglas Adams 
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:49 PM
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1
>>>
>>>A couple of reasons
>>>
>>>1. As people keep buying the product they will buy the SP1 
>>>version of it which has significant updates for security, 
>>>etc. Best to get the old stuff out of the channels.
>>>
>>>2. Gets several feature packs out there with the media so people 
>>> a. Know about it at all, lots of folks don't know about 
>>>the RTW stuff
>>> b. Feel that it is fully supported (this was an issue 
>>>with acceptance of ADAM)
>>>
>>>Even if you don't want any of the feature packs, you want R2 
>>>or at least ADAM SP1 for the AD Tool updates. This and more 
>>>is discussed in the book in the signature below[1]. ;o)
>>>
>>>Don't upgrade to R2 because you think it is a new OS. 
>>>Upgrade if you need the feature packs (or tools as mentioned 
>>>above). I do recommend slapping the schema in when you can, 
>>>at some point, you will most likely need to apply it so this 
>>>gives you good head start for getting it in there if you 
>>>don't need it right away.
>>>
>>>
>>>   joe 
>>>
>>>[1] BTW, anyone who has had a chance to go through the book 
>>>I wouldn't mind hearing reviews (or better reading them on 
>>>Amazon) and/or thoughts on it. I am getting very positive 
>>>feedback so far on the updates and folks are really enjoying 
>>>it. Worst comment is that ADAM deserves more room and I 
>>>completely agree, ADAM is a book unto itself that I am 
>>>making up notes on now for including a whole section on 
>>>Microsoft dorking with the name. If you know an MS Marketing 
>>>person, please kick them in the knee for me. Tell them they 
>>>can respond to me at my email address. ADAM was a great 
>>>name, you could say, this is a case for ADAM madam! Oh no, 
>>>now you have to say something stupid like we need MSADLDS or 
>>>ADLDS or even LDS. At least they could have something fun 
>>>and called it Lightweight Service Directory. ADLDS and LDS 
>>>are not fun. ADAM is fun.
>>>Microsoft, stop being a stick in the mud you boobs.
>>>Ah, back to work. Maybe post more over the weekend but 
>>>probably not, too busy.
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - 
>>>http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
>>> 
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>>>Salandra, Justin A.
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:26 PM
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1
>>>
>>>So Windows 2003 R2 is nothing more then Windows 2003 SP1???  
>>>Then why release R2 at all?
>>>
>>>Justin A. Salandra
>>>MCSE Windows 2000 & 2003
>>>Network and Technology Services Manager
>>>Catholic Healthcare System
>>>646.505.3681 - office
>>>917.455.0110 - cell
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:45 AM
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1
>>>
>>>R2 CD1 == w2k3 SP1.
>>>R2 CD2 == addon components.
>>>
>>>Does that help?
>>>neil
>>>
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>>>Bahta, Nathaniel V Contractor N

RE: [ActiveDir] HP Insight Manger Question

2006-02-17 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de

really, don't you? ;-)

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
GuidoSent: Friday, February 17, 2006 22:19To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] HP Insight
Manger Question

Hello Jose - "and since we have
several HP employees on this list" - so I guess you're also assuming
I know everything about printers ;-)
I have no clue if Insight Manager has this function, but
I'll try to find out.
/Guido
P.S.: if I get the answer, you'll owe me a question on
Intel procs :-)

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros,
JoseSent: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 23:42To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] HP Insight Manger
Question

Greetings,

I realize that this is off
topic, however I need to put together a report using Insight Manager and since
we have several HP employees on this list, I was wondering if Insight Manger
has the capability of just giving me a report listing only the CPU temperature
of each system that I am managing rather then a full report?
Sincerely,
Jose
MedeirosIntel CorporationMCP+I, MCSE, NT4 MCT408-765-0437
Direct408-449-6621 Cell
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

47 matches

Mail list logo