RE: [ActiveDir] dynamic disks
NG2003 works on scsi disks? -Original Message- From: stefano tufillaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] dynamic disks Norton Ghost 2003 It's harder to have not it. It works in WIndows 2000 (NT) and copy the first disk DIRECTLY in the second and give you the possibility to repart, remove etc. or 1) I have the other disk in line as 2nd disk 2) I format it in NTFS new = NTFS old (4=4 or 5=5) 3) I use Xcopy (the new XCOPY 2000) with all the useful options from first disk to the second disk (Also security option, and the copy of the file that if in use will make at the reboot) 4) After the succesful copy I change disk and after one or two boot to make the pagefile and the reallocate and the real firm of the disk in the refistry and other it is ready this is very longer but partially it less expensive. BYe From: Pelle, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] dynamic disks Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:50:17 -0500 Anyone know of some secret voodoo that will allow me to dynamically change the partition size of my system partition without rebuilding the server? I need to make the drive bigger... Joe Pelle Systems Administrator Information Technology Valassis / Targeted Print Media Solutions 35955 Schoolcraft Rd. Livonia, MI 48150 Tel 734.632.3753 Fax 734.632.6240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.valassis.com/ http://www.valassis.com/ This message may have included proprietary or protected information. This message and the information contained herein are not to be further communicated without my express written consent. _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Identifying laptops on domain
We use machine naming conventions to distingush laptops [airport code of city][branch location id][computer role,Workstation,laptop..etc][date built] Also we've got a database with every piece of hardware so we know.. Wes -Original Message- From: Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:32 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Identifying laptops on domain Existing IP scheme is static, and that's not viable to change at this time. -Original Message- From: PERRIN Martial (EURIWARE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:16 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Identifying laptops on domain You can do this with segmentation on a DHCP network. Martial -Message d'origine- De: Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: vendredi 7 mars 2003 16:04 À: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet: [ActiveDir] OT: Identifying laptops on domain Perhaps someone here might know: Is there any machine attribute or registry value that can be queried to differentiate workstations and laptops on a domain? We have a circumstance that requires laptops to be addressed differently from workstations, and we have been unable to find any consistent variable to poll for this determination. Any suggestions or assistance is most appreciated. John A. Bjelke Systems administrator 505.853.6774 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this Email communication are confidential to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient you may not disclose or distribute this communication in any form but should immediately contact the Sender. The information, images, documents and views expressed in this Email are personal to the Sender and do not expressly or implicitly represent official positions and policies of Unisys Federal Systems or it's subsidiaries and no authority exists on behalf of Unisys to make any agreements, representations or other binding commitment by means of Email. ATTENTION : Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, vous n'êtes pas autorisé à copier, retransmettre, distribuer, révéler ou conserver le contenu de ce message. WARNING : If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorised to copy, disclose, distribute or retain in this e-mail. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Expiring passwords?
Win2k sp3 2 DC's in mixed mode, win2k pro clients. Most clients when instructed to change their password after it has expired, it won't let them. The errors it gives are sporadic and usually different. Any quick hints? Wes List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Active Directory Authentication via ras
Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Authentication via ras
Yup.. Redhate.. Thanks!! -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Authentication via ras Easiets if you're using Red Hat. Which distro are you using? Anyways here's the info: http://online.securityfocus.com/infocus/1563 -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weston Rogers Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Authentication via ras Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
I have 'em set to never so they don't bug me ;p -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due
RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000
Title: Message I've had the same problem as well, but it was with SP3, after another re-install I applied SP3 right after xchange and it worked fine. -Original Message-From: Travis Riddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I have seen something similar to this before. I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server. The services would fail to start and I could not start them manually. I ended up re-installing everything on the box and tried rebooting again, same thing happened. I reinstalled a third time and then I installed Exchange service pack 2 before I rebooted, and everything came up fine. I have talked with a few people after the fact and they had no explanation as to what exactly was going on, but it worked with SP2. On similar hardware I have been able to reproduce the scenario, so maybe it has something to do with the hardware configuration. At any rate, you cant install service pack 2 unless all services are running, so you have to install it right after you install Exchange, BEFORE the initial reboot. I hope this helps with your problem. As a side note, I did NOT install Exchange on a DC, it was a member server. Travis Riddle -Original Message-From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:58 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I am in the process of setting up Exchange 2000 on one of our DC's and when I finish the install and reboot, I receive an error that a service failed to load. The Exchange information store is the service that will not start. I did some searches on the error and found little info. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange and this did not help the problem. Has anyone had this problem on initial setup? I am also looking for info on configuring an AD connector to exchange, any tips or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks John Hicks | KEMET Electronics Corporation | Network EngineerPhone: 864-228-4473 | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AOL IM: ipaq1978[ Mailing: 2835 KEMET Way Simpsonville, SC 29681 USA ]
RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services
Like? -Original Message- From: Prajapati, Ashok (London) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:39 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services Aren't there a lot of issues with installing vnc onto any type of win 2k server? --- For very important information relating to this e-mail please click on this link: http://www.ml.com/legal_info.htm -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 January 2003 16:27 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services right -Original Message- From: Granatella Adam J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:50 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services You are going to try this in a test environment before putting it on your production servers, right? I mean, you wouldn't try something you've never done before on your production boxes based on the words from a mailing list, right? -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:38 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services No I just wanted to be sure that there would be no problems when I go to load that on a server running terminal Services -Original Message- From: John B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services No problems here. What type problems are you having...error messages? --- Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone come across a problem with running VNC Server and Terminal Server on the same box at the same time? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 914.681.8117 office 646.483.3325 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please tell us immediately by return e-mail and delete the document. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Dns error..
I get these every now and again.. Everything is working fine.. (hope that doesn't jinx me.) === EVENT #: 93 EVENTLOG : System EVENT TYPE : ERROR (1) SOURCE : NETLOGON EVENT ID : 5774 TIME : 1/17/2003 12:25:40 PM MESSAGE: Registration of the DNS record 'd711a89e-98c1-4637-9e03-d0dd91742ce7._msdcs.targettire.com. 600 IN CNAME targetx.targettire.com.' failed with the following error: DNS name does not exist. === Any clues? win2ksp3 -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:59 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Looking for Disaster Recvoery Procedure Here's some good information that picked up from our group. Compaq services also has a nice one... ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/supportinformation/papers/ps-99-23.pdf See the AD disaster recovery whitepaper at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodt echn ol/ad/windows2000/support/adrecov.asp Cliff Airhart Answer Financial Inc. Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness [EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you. -Original Message- From: John B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[ActiveDir] Looking for Disaster Recvoery Procedure Hi does anyone know of where I can find some good DRP documentation on AD? Thanks... __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] ADSI and RAS
Title: Message Dunno about ADSI, but on the win2k resource kit there's rasusers.exe which does what you are trying to do.. -Original Message-From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:20 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir] ADSI and RAS Hi all, Just wondering if any of you have done this and would be so kind to forward it to me before I go and re code it, I need to run a report against my Windows NT4 domain (PDC or BDC) and retrieve all the users that have RAS options i.e. they are allowed to dial in. Regards, Carlos Magalhaes
RE: [ActiveDir] ADSI and RAS
Title: Message woh, dameware is pretty sweet. -Original Message-From: EALES, Jack - FPIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:41 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADSI and RAS Go to www.dameware.com and get the 30 day trial of the Dameware Utilities Exporter - it'll let you get this info and a whole lot more then buy a copy because it's a superb suite of tools for NT4.0 management, I've not tried it on AD yet - but it works for managing Win2K boxes as well... Just my $0.02 Regards, Jack -Original Message-From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2003 06:20To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir] ADSI and RAS Hi all, Just wondering if any of you have done this and would be so kind to forward it to me before I go and re code it, I need to run a report against my Windows NT4 domain (PDC or BDC) and retrieve all the users that have RAS options i.e. they are allowed to dial in. Regards, Carlos Magalhaes
RE: [ActiveDir] Protocols Required
Maybe this will help? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278339 -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:49 PM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] Protocols Required Importance: High Hello everyone, I really need some help on this subject. Does everyone here know that when you move a mailbox in exchange to another mailbox in the same organization the outlook 2000 client automatically reconfigures the mail server setting on the profile to allow the client to contact the correct mail server where that mailbox now resides. My question is what are the protocols needed by the client in order for that to occur and the ports associated with them. I believe it is NetBIOS Broadcast calls and RPC but I am not sure. Also what protocols and ports are needed in order to have proper communication between client and server when it comes to exchange. Thanks for your help. Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 914.681.8117 office 646.483.3325 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir]
Title: Message
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=10010source=
-Original Message-From: John B
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 5:40
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir]
I am getting an event id 10010 which refers to DCOM. The message is
The server { number in her} did not register with DCOM within the required
timeout. Any help would be much appreciated. thanks in advance
John
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Mail
Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now
RE: [ActiveDir]
Title: Message
Anytime :)
-Original Message-From: John B
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 6:03
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir]
thanks weston. I checked out that link and was able to find something that
I believe might be causing the problem. I believe it's related to terminal
services and BITS. I made the change or fix, I'll have to review the event log
to confirm that this has been fixed. I appreciate your help, hope you have a
great new year.
John
Weston Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=10010source=
-Original Message-From: John B
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 5:40
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[ActiveDir]
I am getting an event id 10010 which refers to DCOM. The message is
The server { number in her} did not register with DCOM within the
required timeout. Any help would be much appreciated. thanks in
advance
John
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo!
Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Mail
Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now
RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT 2.0
Title: Message Isn't it on the server .NET RC1 cd? -Original Message-From: Brad Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:55 AMTo: Active Directory Mailing ListSubject: [ActiveDir] ADMT 2.0 Any know where I can find a beta version of Microsoft Active Directory Migration Tool 2.0? Im doing an upgrade/migration at the end of this week (nothing like a last minute deployment) and it would be really useful to have it. Thanks. Brad Martin Go Daddy Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] 480.505.8800 ext. 250
[ActiveDir] OT: E2k default mailbox size
Title: Message Whats the default size for e2k sp3mailboxes? I don't see any docs that mention it. Wes
RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD
Since you paid for the software, I suggest making them fix it and/or work with you to fix it if you can't figure out yourself.. That's what support is for ;) Wes -Original Message- From: Pelle, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:15 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD You are correct (both of you!) We do have the registry keys added, auditing enabled, and AD does have to be in Native mode (which we are in). Still not too sure why the migration tool is not functioning properly (strange though how things work out so well when you have the sales rep/tech doing the initial training).. Joe Pelle Systems Administrator Information Technology Valassis / Targeted Print Media Solutions 35955 Schoolcraft Rd. Livonia, MI 48150 Tel 734.632.3753 Fax 734.632.6240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.valassis.com/ This message may have included proprietary or protected information. This message and the information contained herein are not to be further communicated without my express written consent. -Original Message- From: Linton Smith (WBTQ) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:00 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD Graham, I believe you are correct. NT4 BDC's have no understanding of the sIDHistory attribute, so I don't see it could function in a mixed mode target domain. Most migration tools use the ClonePrincipal API to obtain the source sid, and this requires a few things: - TCPIPClientSupport registry setting on the PDC of the source domain - Auditing of user and group management enabled in both source and target domains HTH, Linton -Original Message- From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD yes, but how does it keep the SID from the source domain - ADMT populates the SIDhistory attribute of the user object. the values of the SIDhistory and the SID of the account domain are added to the token at user logon. as i understand and from my original post the SIDhistory attribute is only available in native mode domains QUest and other domain tools must do things a bit differently ... GT only available how does it do - Original Message - From: Pelle, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:08 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD If I understand your question correctly the tool for migration: Quest, allows the user to make a decision to keep the SID's on the source domain(s) or remove/disable them... Joe Pelle Systems Administrator Information Technology Valassis / Targeted Print Media Solutions 35955 Schoolcraft Rd. Livonia, MI 48150 Tel 734.632.3753 Fax 734.632.6240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.valassis.com/ This message may have included proprietary or protected information. This message and the information contained herein are not to be further communicated without my express written consent. -Original Message- From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD would be interested to know how the access is maintained to resources in the source domain - unless of course ALL references to the source account domain global groups / user accounts are duplicated. GT - Original Message - From: Weston Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:58 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD Not true, although I don't know what the requirements of the Quest software are, I know DMW doesn't care about modes. -- Weston Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800.849.5147 x255 -Original Message- From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD is the target domain in native mode ?? understood to be mandatory for the sidhistory attribute GT - Original Message - From: Pelle, Joe To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:15 PM Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Migration tools and AD Hello there! I'd like to know if anyone has had any experience using Quest migration tools? If so, I am having some specific issues migrating SIDHistory: I am unable to move the SID history from my NT domain to my new AD structure. I am successful migrating the user(s) but unable to get the SID to come with them! Quest suggests that I have SP2 installed for 128bit encryption when migrating SIDHistory from client to server. I have SP3 already... Any suggestions?! Thanks! Joe Pelle Systems Administrator Information Technology Valassis / Targeted Print Media Solutions
RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange install
That's _GREAT_ to hear. My company isn't going to spend 8 g's to go to advanced server just because e2k won't run on our 3gb win2k servers. I only have 150 mailboxes on a NT box with like 96 mb of ram (lol) so hopefully by the time it gets errors I'll be long gone. -Original Message- From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:DMA8;pge.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:13 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange install Our Exchange boxes have 4 GB of memory. Initial plan was to run standard version. Our first live box began generating memory fragmentation issues. Supposedly this was fixed in SP3 as per PSS but no go. The only fix was to upgrade to Advanced and use the /3gb switch in the boot.ini (only supported in advanced) -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:wrogers;targettire.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:41 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange install No, But from what I've heard, if you have over 3 gig of memory on the box and its going to run e2k, its recommended to install adv server, but I dunno how accurate that statement is. -Original Message- From: Sheri Brown [mailto:sbrown;c-s-d.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange install Do you have to have Windows 2000 Advanced Server to install Exchange? Sheri L. Brown, Systems Administrator CSD Headquarters -- Technology Department 102 North Krohn Place Sioux Falls, SD 57103 (605) 367-5760 ext 3202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Re-installing DC?
I reformatted a second DC (name - jax1) and brought it up again, ran dcpromo and it says this : The operation failed because: The attempt to join this computer to the targettire.com domain failed. The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. WTF? I've done this a few times already without any problems, now all of a sudden its doing it. I ran ntdsutil par of Q216498 and deleted all the junk.. Also I've tried renaming it to jax2, to no avail. Thanks, -- Wes List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Domain migration wizard
Has anyone used aelita's domain migration wizard in production? Reason why I am asking is I need a reference to talk with who has used the product so I can justify the cost to upper management in order to buy it. Anyone willing to chat for a few mins on the phone or such can email me offline. Thanks!! Wes List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2
http://www.aelita.com/products/DMW.htm For a few grand this does everything, 'nuff said. -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:jasalandra;chcsnet.org] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:24 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Is there any migration tool that doesn't require the target be in native mode. -Original Message- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 erADMT requires that the target be native, too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:18 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 But move tree requires that the target domain be in native mode. I have some places that need to stay in mixed mode. -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:tony;mail.activedir.org] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 You've got Movetree to move objects within a Forest. You don't need to migrate with ADMT. http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7614 Tony -- Original Message -- From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:47:56 -0400 So I can use ADMT v2 in a Windows 2000 AD environment to migrate between domains? Such as parent to child? -Original Message- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Version 1 was/is usable in Win2k environments as well - typically cross forest. From the ADMT v 2.0 README: Scripting and command-line interface Password migration Migration log files Credentials needed for migration operators SID Mapping Files for security translation Windows 2000 attribute exclusion Agent credentials no longer required Fix membership is optional Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000] Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000 Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. --- Arthur C. Clarke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:44 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 What is the difference between ADMT v2 and v1? Can you use the ADMT v2 in a Windows 2000 Active Directory Enviorment? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 914.681.8117 office 646.483.3325 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Diane, Look under the ADMT folder in the I386 directory. Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000] Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000 Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. --- Arthur C. Clarke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:29 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 All: I'm looking for ADMT version 2. I've dug around my .NET CDs and can't find it. Can someone point me in the right direction... Diane List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%
RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2
Sure does, aeltia does everything. ;p -Original Message- From: Stuart Kwan [mailto:skwan;windows.microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Does it use SID History for the migration? -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Kevin [mailto:KSullivan;aelita.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Aelita Domain Migration Wizard... (For one) -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:jasalandra;chcsnet.org] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:24 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Is there any migration tool that doesn't require the target be in native mode. -Original Message- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 erADMT requires that the target be native, too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:18 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 But move tree requires that the target domain be in native mode. I have some places that need to stay in mixed mode. -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:tony;mail.activedir.org] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 You've got Movetree to move objects within a Forest. You don't need to migrate with ADMT. http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7614 Tony -- Original Message -- From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:47:56 -0400 So I can use ADMT v2 in a Windows 2000 AD environment to migrate between domains? Such as parent to child? -Original Message- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Version 1 was/is usable in Win2k environments as well - typically cross forest. From the ADMT v 2.0 README: Scripting and command-line interface Password migration Migration log files Credentials needed for migration operators SID Mapping Files for security translation Windows 2000 attribute exclusion Agent credentials no longer required Fix membership is optional Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000] Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000 Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. --- Arthur C. Clarke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:44 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 What is the difference between ADMT v2 and v1? Can you use the ADMT v2 in a Windows 2000 Active Directory Enviorment? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 914.681.8117 office 646.483.3325 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Diane, Look under the ADMT folder in the I386 directory. Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000] Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000 Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. --- Arthur C. Clarke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:29 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 All: I'm looking for ADMT version 2. I've dug around my .NET CDs and can't find it. Can someone point me in the right direction... Diane List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir% 40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive:
[ActiveDir] NT to AD client migration headaches.. blargh
Hey guys. I've got a few questions and I hope someone can lead me in the right direction or give me a heads up on an idea that will help my situation. My situation is that we have 1 NT 4 domain (1 PDC, 1 BDC, 1 webserver) with 300 so clients scattered throughout 5 states. We are consolidating the 3 servers into 2 and just totally replaced all our network equip. I've tested the plan I created for our migration , but when clients log onto the new domain after being on the old one, the workstation (all win2k pro) sets up a new profile since it's a new domain, thus loosing all of their stuff .. 1 - is there any way to change this? I heard rumors about a profiler converter or something of that nature, I can't have 300 people call me at once in order for me to walk their clueless asses though email setup, etc. (lol) 2 - Or is it possible for AD to become a DC of a NT4 domain in mixed mode then after account migration remove the NT4 machines (I assume the netbios AD name could be the same as the current NT4 domain name and still have a required FQDN for AD) so clients still use the same netbios domain name for logon. I've done countless migrations , but none that fix this issue, I have NO other issues except with trying to make this as transparent as possible for the clients. I really appreciate your time, Thanks, Wes -- Wes List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] NT to AD client migration headaches.. blargh
I'm starting to like the sound of this. Anyone have any info for me to check out? Thanks. Wes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:09 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NT to AD client migration headaches.. blargh Yes -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:29 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] NT to AD client migration headaches.. blargh I need to preserve all groups/users/mailboxes/mail/public folders for the whole domain, does an in-place upgrade accomplish that? Wes -Original Message- From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NT to AD client migration headaches.. blargh Any reason why you can't do an in-place upgrade instead of migrating ? Dave -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:44 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ActiveDir] NT to AD client migration headaches.. blargh Hey guys. I've got a few questions and I hope someone can lead me in the right direction or give me a heads up on an idea that will help my situation. My situation is that we have 1 NT 4 domain (1 PDC, 1 BDC, 1 webserver) with 300 so clients scattered throughout 5 states. We are consolidating the 3 servers into 2 and just totally replaced all our network equip. I've tested the plan I created for our migration , but when clients log onto the new domain after being on the old one, the workstation (all win2k pro) sets up a new profile since it's a new domain, thus loosing all of their stuff .. 1 - is there any way to change this? I heard rumors about a profiler converter or something of that nature, I can't have 300 people call me at once in order for me to walk their clueless asses though email setup, etc. (lol) 2 - Or is it possible for AD to become a DC of a NT4 domain in mixed mode then after account migration remove the NT4 machines (I assume the netbios AD name could be the same as the current NT4 domain name and still have a required FQDN for AD) so clients still use the same netbios domain name for logon. I've done countless migrations , but none that fix this issue, I have NO other issues except with trying to make this as transparent as possible for the clients. I really appreciate your time, Thanks, Wes -- Wes List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
